Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

ECUTEK CAR w/ NO MODS goes 107+mph Trap Speed!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #106  
xtremeboost's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Full manifold-back exhaust, weight reduction -360lbs, rims, intake, WGA, C16, sensor manipulation etc.

If you think it was done on 9.8AFR and 13* ITA, thats comical.

We plan on 11's in full weight with no racefuel.


you quoted this guy : Originally Posted by ibarkovic View Post
xtreme-boost , ran 11 secs on a stock turbo-non modified- and stock tune, so go figure haha

Fact : Please do NOT speak on my behalf when you have no actual facts on MY car !!!! My car is ONLY missing the rear crash bar, for you to say that we're missing 360lbs is really just plain stupid . If you would like to "call me out" on this forum please I beg of you to do so ! Every fact I have stated on my car are 100% correct and true !! Not one thing has been hidden not one thing has been made to look like something else . The fact is that because of my advance knowlege on the Evo X I have been able to take my knowlege and make the parts according to the car and its needs . Just think about that VERY carefully , I have just done bolt-on parts with zero biggie back , no chip , no spray nothing and yet I have done something that for months not one other person has been able to do with or without a tune ; now just think of how well my car will run once its actually tuned .

Once again , please call me out on that 360lbs missing from my car but please lets make a public bet on that . I Here by bet everything I own on that being complete and total bullsh_t on your part . Now insert your bet here ___________ !!!!

I will no longer stand for ANY of your BS man , so lets do this if its what you'd like


Best Regards

Frank

Last edited by xtremeboost; Sep 18, 2008 at 10:36 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #107  
SASD209's Avatar
Admin Alumni
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
From: KCEF
Y'all need to relax in this thread....... Noize and I are reviewing this on a daily basis. Vendors and members are held to the same standard: I court no favorites. Please conduct yourselves accordingly. Thanks.

SASD209
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #108  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by SASD209
Understood, my comment was not directed to anybody in particular. I'd ask that we all keep this professional and respectful. Our actions and statements reflect upon us, and we all have to live with the consequences. Carry on fellas, let's keep this "fight" clean.

SASD209


Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #109  
SASD209's Avatar
Admin Alumni
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
From: KCEF
Last time I'm going to say it.......watch it guys. I'm a reasonable fella, but I've banned members and vendors before: nobody pays my bills here, I answer to the owners who happen to like me.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #110  
Most-Wanted's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 5
From: ATLANTA
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Actually we tuned his car to 125mph traps which have never been repeated anywhere by any other shop.

Our recent back to back dyno comparisons have shown that with a new oem turbo, meth injection, aem, custom intake and retune elsewhere, the car still made less power. Cft's dyno reads +3%hp and +9% tq.

We had an independant tuner take a car from here to there with no changes make the % offsets noted above.

This means 386whp on our dyno as done by Brian equaled 397+ at CFT which was a contributing factor to it running faster with us than it ever did anywhere else. We wish him the best of luck with the new engine and new sponsors. We only ask that the facts be allowed to be outlined in order to be fair.
I will be brief and civil per mods request. But I should be able to defend your accustations. You just stated above you only ask the facts be outlined in order to be fair. The facts are you were unable to get my car into the 10's. You were also unwilling to move forward and remedy any issues. Where did you get 397 BTW? Power is higher than that. So please stop interjecting your one sided and wrong info about me every chance you get. This thread is about X ecus and not how you feel about me. I for one am very interested in a X and its tuning potential outcome. I've been thinking of buying one for a daily driver.

Last edited by Most-Wanted; Sep 19, 2008 at 12:05 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 02:19 AM
  #111  
maxx13's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: california
This is really impressive, great job guys
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 02:36 AM
  #112  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
i appreciate this. i guess i was a bit confused and disappointed when noize deleted one of my posts in the TTP engineering thread recently where i was trying to guess the price of the "zchip" based on what i knew about it and other solutions and got into discussion with someone who thinks that zchip is better than ecutek tune, this seems to be the same type scenario, thats all

Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
This thread is still on topic and other tuning options are welcome to be discussed in comparison to the Ecutek.. Just as long as there is no slander or bashing i think all is in good conversation so far/./.

Last edited by pltek; Sep 19, 2008 at 05:22 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 04:11 AM
  #113  
hova00's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: WILMINGTON
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
FYI, Hova, I tuned Most Wanted's car way back in 2005 or 2006 when the IX's first started to come out and he had a basic Buschur Stage II with a then Tech Tom IX reflash - this was well before Ecu Flash. With a custom pump gas tune on race gas he went an amazing 11.56.

Lucky for me I was there at the Spring Nationals in Florida to watch him drive the car in a NHRA event.

Of course since those days he sold that car and bought another which has been worked on by a few different shops and he has continued to keep the passion for driving his Evo fast.

Al
Exactly, you had nothing to do with his current cars set up or accomplishments. That is good news for him whether he knows it or not.

Have you had any luck with the X's? How is the Ecutek tuning with them going? You have been pretty quiet about them but i guess that is because the X that you guys have still doesnt have a motor.

it will take you a while to figure out the logic behind tuning something that is a little closer to the complexity of a Subaru ECU but iam pretty sure that you will eventually figure some of it out. Thank god you arent making claims about power that isnt backed up. Hey i will have to keep an eye out for you when the DYNOFLASH/ICS EVO X gets back on the road with its new motor.

I have to agree with you though that a ECUTEK is far superior to any piggyback that iam familiar with.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 04:22 AM
  #114  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
he is not promoting himself but simply stating opinion about flashing which is what ECUtek software does. If you wanna talk chip or Zchip go to the other thread that TTP started.

Noize erased my posts in the TTP thread because i merely said a few things about flashing where the thread is about zchip, go figure

Thanks AL

Thanks Al.
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
i thought this thread was about the tune vs chip etc and not about what Dynoflash can do or cant.
Go figure...
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 05:38 AM
  #115  
Blazing VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Every where...
Originally Posted by zTargeTz
easier to install (no shipping down time) same performance, maybe cheaper? (who knows..) and EASILY REMOVABLE.

with warranty concerns this product is the winner in my mind.
The only major flaw I see in this is the MBC (which is a must according to TTP). Yes, a bone stock car with just this piggyback would be very easy to convert to "dealer bone stock", if you will. You just unplug it. BUT what about the MBC? Obviously the dealer isn't just looking to see if the car was tuned.

So for a huge hypothetical IF...

IF something were to happen to your car while running the z-chip and MBC, will you remember how the stock boost controller was hooked up EXACTLY so that there are no traces what-so-ever of the MBC?

Running a MBC will void your warranty very fast. Maybe if the z-chip could control boost, there wouldn't be this hypothetical. A feature for future models maybe??
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #116  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by pltek
he is not promoting himself but simply stating opinion about flashing which is what ECUtek software does. If you wanna talk chip or Zchip go to the other thread that TTP started.

Noize erased my posts in the TTP thread because i merely said a few things about flashing where the thread is about zchip, go figure

Thanks AL

Thanks Al.

Posting complaints about me soft deleting your post twice in one thread is overkill, and you need to get over yourself post haste.

That's TTP's advertising thread for their Z chip, and they are a legitimate vendor here. If you want to talk about reflashes vs. piggybacks, this is the place, not their technical thread.

Moderating is largely a thankless job. You have no idea how many reported posts, PMs, and IMs I get from people that are unhappy because things aren't going their way. Its like being in the center of a circle where opposite forces who have different vantage points of things try to pull you to the outside and rip you from where you are supposed to be. But correct and fair moderating is blazing right a trail up the center of the path of neutrality, and its really a _ton_ of work. You can't drive on emotion at all, so you have to try to serve everyone by operating on logic and facts. Just policing a thread like this takes way more time out of the staff's life than it is worth.

But there are people on both sides with strong and valid points. In truth, there are great cases for each product, and I do not think one dominates the other convincingly. As with any vendor/tuner, the wise thing for the consumer to do is to establish a relationship with someone you trust that you believe does good work. Though often competitive (hey, its captialism!), I do believe we have some truly awesome vendors here with great products and services. Read, weed out, sift through, learn, and go with the one that is the best for you.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 06:33 AM
  #117  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Havin an issue with someone and calling them "*******", "asshat", "asstard", or ***-whatever is childish and won't get you a warning in these forums. It will get you a vendor on vendor infraction and a temp ban. Act like adults, please. Ye have been warned.

Off topic crap, excess flaming, and regurgitations removed.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 07:05 AM
  #118  
Nsomniac's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 647
Likes: 39
From: South Dakota
Just to add to what Noize has already said, a lot of us reading these posts are potential customers. While we are using this thread to gain information about the options available to us, we are also gauging professionalism and trustworthiness of the vendors who are taking part in the discussion. Many of us are no where near the tuning / retail shops you own and operate, and our orders would be online or by phone. This forum is the only way we can form an opinion of the way we believe you conduct business.

Just something to think about when you type things in the box with your website and business name attached to the message.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #119  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Nsomniac
Just to add to what Noize has already said, a lot of us reading these posts are potential customers. While we are using this thread to gain information about the options available to us, we are also gauging professionalism and trustworthiness of the vendors who are taking part in the discussion. Many of us are no where near the tuning / retail shops you own and operate, and our orders would be online or by phone. This forum is the only way we can form an opinion of the way we believe you conduct business.

Just something to think about when you type things in the box with your website and business name attached to the message.

I agree..

I apologize if at any point i got off topic but hey were all human.. Sometimes you speak before you think and in this case sometimes i type before i think..
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 11:41 AM
  #120  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
noize i am not complaining simply stating my opinion and point of view as you just did below about me. You dont know me so telling me to get over myself is a big assumption on your part, i assume you mean that i am full of myself. Opinionated yes, but so are you,..not sure how me stating a fact that you deleted a post which i thought was totally harmless proves your point there, but whatever.

if you compare TTP thread title and this thread title, they are exactly along the same lines, each one was started by a vendor, each one addresses a particular type of tuning tool, so please tell me how does it make sense to talk about any tuning method in here and not in the TTP thread.

i am not picking a fight with you and i do appreciate the time you spend moderating, so thank you !!!





Originally Posted by Noize
Posting complaints about me soft deleting your post twice in one thread is overkill, and you need to get over yourself post haste.

That's TTP's advertising thread for their Z chip, and they are a legitimate vendor here. If you want to talk about reflashes vs. piggybacks, this is the place, not their technical thread.

Moderating is largely a thankless job. You have no idea how many reported posts, PMs, and IMs I get from people that are unhappy because things aren't going their way. Its like being in the center of a circle where opposite forces who have different vantage points of things try to pull you to the outside and rip you from where you are supposed to be. But correct and fair moderating is blazing right a trail up the center of the path of neutrality, and its really a _ton_ of work. You can't drive on emotion at all, so you have to try to serve everyone by operating on logic and facts. Just policing a thread like this takes way more time out of the staff's life than it is worth.

But there are people on both sides with strong and valid points. In truth, there are great cases for each product, and I do not think one dominates the other convincingly. As with any vendor/tuner, the wise thing for the consumer to do is to establish a relationship with someone you trust that you believe does good work. Though often competitive (hey, its captialism!), I do believe we have some truly awesome vendors here with great products and services. Read, weed out, sift through, learn, and go with the one that is the best for you.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:01 PM.