Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Should I get EVO X or wait for Nissan 370Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #46  
Shady Milkman's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: morris, nj
Originally Posted by 4Trouble
350Z is a very capable car that can do many things, kinda like mk4 supra. With some internal upgrades and twin turbo kit, it can make some monster power.
However, the car is usually regarded as a grand tourer with missing back seats due to the way it drives. The car doesn't do too well on fun factor scale, thanks to its shared platform and engine with trucks and family sedans. It is also amongst the most expensive to insure (along with the Evo), as a lot of teenagers receive it as a graduation gift, then wrap a tree with it within a week. A lot of the aftermarket parts are expensive especially if you are looking for quality, I would say almost E46 M3 level.

Both Evo X and 370Z are (and will be) fast cars in stock form with great potential for further performance upgrade, it really depends on what the purpose of your car and how much you are willing to spend further down the road.
a 350z is NOTHING like a supra

a supra has run 9s on a with no internal work, you cant come close to that with a 350z
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #47  
Shabarivas's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Nor-Cali
I bet you that a nismo Z (non 37 engine) will spank a stock 370z on any track... lol you must be on crack if you think 30 hp and -200 lbs will get you that much... LOL nismo Z's run circles around is350's and m3's all day long... what makes you think a stock 370z will do any better?

I have a VQ35... and they are SLOWWW pigs.. yes they have "more" potential... but thats only when you are spending the cost of a GTR in your 40K car. W/ an EVO you spend 4K and you will WALK all over VQ's w/ 15K in mods....
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #48  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Originally Posted by Shabarivas
I bet you that a nismo Z (non 37 engine) will spank a stock 370z on any track... lol you must be on crack if you think 30 hp and -200 lbs will get you that much... LOL nismo Z's run circles around is350's and m3's all day long... what makes you think a stock 370z will do any better?

I have a VQ35... and they are SLOWWW pigs.. yes they have "more" potential... but thats only when you are spending the cost of a GTR in your 40K car. W/ an EVO you spend 4K and you will WALK all over VQ's w/ 15K in mods....
Really? A car purpose-built to be a track car will beat a car not purpose-built to be a track car? You sir, are a genius for opening all of our eyes.

Now answer this: what makes you think you know how the 370Z is gonna be on a track? Have you driven one? Do you know the EXACT specs? Do you know what tires and what size are on the car? Do you know if there's any changes in gearing? What exactly DO you know about the 370Z? My guess... not much at all, like the rest of us.

You drive a slow-pig G35... of course you think all VQ35s are slow. A 13.1@107 is very respectable for a car right out the box ('07 350Z).

More potential when spending the cost of a GT-R? LMAO. $40k car? LMAO even more. You can get a Z for under $30k easy, and as of now the price for a base 370Z is a **** hair under $30k. I mean ****, it ain't cheap to build and boost a Z, but it sure as hell ain't THAT expensive.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #49  
4Trouble's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Originally Posted by Shady Milkman
a 350z is NOTHING like a supra

a supra has run 9s on a with no internal work, you cant come close to that with a 350z
My comparison was more based on the driving feel rather than the capability of stock parts. Yes the Supra was far better car for its time than the 350Z, and still better than the 350Z when it comes to making ultimate power, but also the car cost almost double that of current 350Z if you count by today's dollar. What I am saying is that both cars have that GT feel interms of driving, competed in JGTC, and do fairly decent at drag/road race/auto-x with a little work on the cars.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #50  
Riz5's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Nawlins
Both cars are good but it's what you perfer
a common car seen all over the place
or a car you don't see alot

plus nissan just called back 200,000 cars because of some issue
just thought ya'll might like to know
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #51  
LanEvo9MR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 123
Likes: 1
From: Northern NJ
get a EVO X. Im a kinda Nissan guy, but Im in boostholic.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #52  
fastkevin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Behind the Orange Curtain
Originally Posted by ddawg1130
Man i wish it was middle age white men. Every Z I see here in the chicago land area is driven buy and old white guy with white hair. I've come to think of the Z as the car old white guys who can't afford the vette get.

Now that being said, I also always see old white guys driving vettes but a vette is still my dream car.
Yeah.. here, the Blue Blocker dudes drive the Vettes as well. I actually looked into a Vette before I got the 10. All the dealers I talked to seem to think what GM was doing with the "Employee Pricing" was good enough. They didn't/don't feel they need to discount them any more. Famous last words. They're all circling the drain.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #53  
mike100's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by fastkevin
Yeah.. here, the Blue Blocker dudes drive the Vettes as well. I actually looked into a Vette before I got the 10. All the dealers I talked to seem to think what GM was doing with the "Employee Pricing" was good enough. They didn't/don't feel they need to discount them any more. Famous last words. They're all circling the drain.
The current offer is zero percent for 4 years on 2008 vettes, but I know many dealers are still selling at employee pricing or better plus the zero percent. A base coupe is about the same price as msrp on an MR. The C6 will pretty much outgun the evo in just about every performance metric stock to stock. They just don't have back seats and sit pretty damn low for a DD.

I don't know how well the 370Z will be by the time it comes out, but I'm pretty sure a C6 will sodomize that thing too. If the base model really is going to be about $30k then fine, but I bet it will be more like $38K with a couple of options in which case the competition from GM, BMW and all that comes into play.

Last edited by mike100; Oct 16, 2008 at 09:10 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 09:35 PM
  #54  
dbsears's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by goofygrin
You might go check and see how your precious IX handled vs. BlackTrack on the track this year in the NASA TT.

Might change your mind a bit
Haha 1 guy...have you forgot how many VIII's and IX's hold records?

350Z insurance in much cheaper than evo's. 370Z is lighter and from what I have read may come close to 350hp should run possible high 12's stock. Considering most HR Z's already run low 13's stock. Warranty is better too in most cases plus its just a better built car.

Handling wise the last two track events I was in the fastest car there was an 03 BSP prepped Z that whooped just about everybody. They can be fast pretty easily.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #55  
trexxx8739's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
350Z insurance is much cheaper than the X? I find that hard to believe. My insurance coming from a 06 SI to the X was a whole 4 dollars more a month. I can't see the 350Z being cheaper than that. The X has AWD and 7 airbags which keeps the pice of insurance down. Whats keeping the price of the 350Z down?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #56  
white_turbo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 259
Likes: 18
Originally Posted by trexxx8739
350Z insurance is much cheaper than the X? I find that hard to believe. My insurance coming from a 06 SI to the X was a whole 4 dollars more a month. I can't see the 350Z being cheaper than that. The X has AWD and 7 airbags which keeps the pice of insurance down. Whats keeping the price of the 350Z down?
A lot of factors come into play.
1) Average age group of people driving either cars (I would think Evo's population should generally be younger, so more expensive).
2) Repair costs. Again due to the Evo probably has a higher exposure to crash (due to #1)
3) Safety equipment and structure of the car may be a factor (350z/370z may have a higher safety rating due to the fact that it is an entry level premium sports coupe)
4) Theft (Evo may have a higher theft rate and worse car theft alarm compared to the Z)
5) Size of the pool (most likely you have more Z owners than the Evo, just because the Z is geared a little more for daily use)

And probably a few more factors when the insurance companies price these policies.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #57  
goofygrin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 4
From: Frisco, TX
From an insurance perspective, my wife's G35S sedan costs $1 more every 6 months than my Evo.

The Evo was cheaper to insure than my Scion tC.

2 doors vs. 4 doors. I'd bet that the Evo is either the same price or cheaper to insure than the 2 door sports car Z.

Haha 1 guy...have you forgot how many VIII's and IX's hold records?
The X has been out one season. The first guy to get serious shatters records and beats VIII and IXs by 3-4 seconds on an incorrectly tuned car due to a last minute intake change. VIII/IX driver admits that there's nothing he could have done to be competitive.

The only record likely to hold will be the mostly worthless (IMO) 1/4 mile bs.

Handling wise the last two track events I was in the fastest car there was an 03 BSP prepped Z that whooped just about everybody. They can be fast pretty easily.
Different region, different cars, different results. Here in Dallas, the lone entrant in BSP is typically a 350z. His times don't hold a candle to the STU prepared STi's and, honestly, I am a poor newb driver and I am pretty dang close to his times in NSTU. I am going to loan my car to a couple guys that are the leaders in BS (one daily drives a VIII) to see just how bad a driver I am. We'll see what they can do that I can't
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #58  
mike100's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
The new 370Z won't run high 12's and cost $33k. the marketing dept. at Nissan will let you believe anything you want long enough to put the car on the street- sort of like the hype with the GTR before they said that launch control voids the warranty. Not saying that they will be slow, but the GTR only runs mid 12's in the real world.

My prediction is 135/335 1/4 mile matching performance with a little advantage in handling.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #59  
Massappeal's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Scumington Beach, Orange county
Originally Posted by mike100
The new 370Z won't run high 12's and cost $33k. the marketing dept. at Nissan will let you believe anything you want long enough to put the car on the street- sort of like the hype with the GTR before they said that launch control voids the warranty. Not saying that they will be slow, but the GTR only runs mid 12's in the real world.

My prediction is 135/335 1/4 mile matching performance with a little advantage in handling.
The 07 ad 08 HR Z's run low low 13's with 107mph traps. So if the new Z has more power and is lighter I do not see why it could not run high 12's
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 09:52 AM
  #60  
goofygrin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 4
From: Frisco, TX
Originally Posted by Massappeal
The 07 ad 08 HR Z's run low low 13's with 107mph traps. So if the new Z has more power and is lighter I do not see why it could not run high 12's
I'd like to see this published.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...n_350z_feature

Says:
Base price: $28,525
0-to-60-mph time: 5.2 sec
Quarter-mile time: 13.7 sec @ 104 mph

http://www.dragtimes.com/Nissan-350Z...lip-14619.html
says:
13.5 @ 102

I've not seen ANY stock 1/4 mile published by a "reputable" source below 13.5. As another posted said, getting a 370z into the 12's will take more than 200# (.2 seconds) and 30hp (.1s? depends on gearing and a whole lot of stuff).

Ask anyone that's taken a car into the 12's and beyond. It's NOT an easy thing to do.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:41 PM.