Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 06:07 AM
  #2011  
bounce's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by GPTourer
Nice try. But you have to understand that the governing mentality of this forum dictates that no matter how many times the facts and proof about something are shown - there have to be at least ten reposts, arguments, wild conjecture and speculation, and then finally someone "discovers" the truth again, and we have to start the process all over.
I think everyone here knows that the engine choice was already announced. I guess the reason people are still speculating is because the engine compartment was covered up on the Concept X. They probably just covered it because the engine bay wasn't nice and tidy, but is it possible there is something in there that they don't want us to see yet?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 06:47 AM
  #2012  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
Originally Posted by allturbo
...ummm the only reason EVO's where made for production was that WRC required a certain amount to be sold to the public in order for them to compete. So unless Mitsu is dropping out of WRC forever, I don't see any V6's or whatever in it's future. Mitsu designed each evo 1-9 with the intent of rally racing in the WRC. That means 2L 4 banger.

BTW, unless Mitsu is using something other than the engine in the concept X, than we already know what the engine is going to be.

http://media.mitsubishi-motors.com/p...etail1343.html

From the link:

"Powertrain: MITSUBISHI Concept-X is powered by a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder DOHC MIVEC intercooler-turbocharged engine"
WRC changed it's rules quite a while ago to no longer require homolagation cars to be produced. So, that is pretty much a mute point.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 06:55 AM
  #2013  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
Originally Posted by A418t81
Yes, every diesel has had direct injection....thats one of the reasons its a diesel. However, when you add direct injection to a gasoline engine, it complicates things quite a bit. I'm sure if they add it, there will be headroom for more power...but not probably not enough to go bigger turbo. Also, OBD is simply a protocol and software, hardware tends take longer amounts of time to design, etc. I'm not saying that direct injection isn't or won't be the wave of the future, but its such a new technology right now that if mitsu does go with it, there won't be a whole lot out to make power w/ the X for most likely quite a while.
I'm not saying that OBD and DI are the same. I understand it takes longer to produce a part. I'm just saying that sooner or later everyone will use it and the aftermarket will provide support for it so we might as well get the ball rolling. It really isn't all that different just higher pressures and different fuel injectors. The software has to be relatively similar in that you are controlling the injectors duty cycle the only thing your adding is injection timing. Which like I was trying to say before if they can provide tuning support to the diesel industry they, should be able to do it for us.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 08:16 AM
  #2014  
Dem_z's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Most Boost. Bigger Wing. Welcome to the next evolution. X.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 08:19 AM
  #2015  
wreckless969's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 1
From: Fort Riley, KS
Well I dont know about the rest of you but I wanna see some numbers, people can argue over engine design, amount of cylinders, and the displacement all day but when it comes down to it there have been turbo charged 4,6, and 8 cylinder engines before...what really maters is what this powerplant can deliver.

And mitsu better come with it because I know everyone wants to see the X with a substantial improvement in horsepower and torgue...And bumping it up 10hp like the usual mitsu tactic seems to have been in the past isnt gonna cut it.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:17 AM
  #2016  
blackevoVII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: Denville, NJ
that bugatti is ***** ugly. Some of you guys are on crack for thinking that thing is good looking. Hell, it looks like a butterfly coming out of a cacoon. Only uglier!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #2017  
cotmfk's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: VA
I don't think the insurance should be $10k/month or more... that is ridiculous. Houses that cost $1.7m and a lot more don't have insurance anywhere even near that.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:28 AM
  #2018  
bdking57's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Del Monte Beach, Monterey, CA
yeah but whens the last time a house could go over 240mph. maybe if it was a rocket house you could compare the two.



Originally Posted by cotmfk
I don't think the insurance should be $10k/month or more... that is ridiculous. Houses that cost $1.7m and a lot more don't have insurance anywhere even near that.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #2019  
brianmcd's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
But you don't drive your house down the street with idiots in other houses trying to hit you.

I still think it'd be less than 10k/month though.

~brian

Originally Posted by cotmfk
I don't think the insurance should be $10k/month or more... that is ridiculous. Houses that cost $1.7m and a lot more don't have insurance anywhere even near that.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 10:43 AM
  #2020  
k270kmh's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1
"Powertrain: MITSUBISHI Concept-X is powered by a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder DOHC MIVEC intercooler-turbocharged engine"

My question is if they will add something new like:
Variable lift + Variable timing on both intake and exhaust.
Two stage intake manifold
Bi-turbo engine.
Variable turbo geometry.

Remember that after the Mivec the peak torque is 3000rpm instead of 3500rpm for JDM models.
The key is to bring the peak torque to 2000/2500rpm and keep it until the red line.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #2021  
EVOoperator's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
If you want to see some pics of the next EVO engine check here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/world-engine.html
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #2022  
zze86's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Originally Posted by EVOoperator
If you want to see some pics of the next EVO engine check here:
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/world-engine.html
That will be VERY interesting! dual VVT with a turbo! can you say M3, dual VANOS, turboed?!?!?!? Hopefully the ECU tuning will be geared towards performance rather than emissions
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #2023  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, MS
I really believe the X engine will be the 4G63 2.0L single turbo simply b/c of the cost factor. Mitsubishi Motors is at a critical juncture in its life and it can afford few risks. The 4G63, while aging, is still potent enough to compete in the present, despite its design dating back to the 1980s. That speaks volumes about the success this motor has enjoyed. It will probably have MIVEC on both camshafts and maybe even additional lift instead of just timing adjustments like in the IX. The target horsepower is no doubt going to be close to 300 hp. I'm guessing 320 at the absolute most.

Also, they are going to keep the price for the base model under $35,000 or else you will alienate your customer base. Younger Evo drivers need to be able to afford this car especially with an all new design that will be subject to public scrutiny for the first time. If the first year is well received, then sometime in the next few years we could see another motor. Just my 2 cents...

Jesse
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #2024  
chrisw's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
From the document off this link...

http://www.lancerregister.com/mlr_im...tion2005_E.pdf

MITSUBISHI Concept-X is powered by a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder DOHC MIVEC intercooler-turbocharged engine and delivers instant response across all engine speeds with flat torque that keeps pulling up to the red line. The new MIVEC engine replaces the cast iron cylinder block with aluminum to reduce weight.
This only improves not only fuel economy but also steerability and other vehicle dynamics. The MIVEC valvetrain brings environmental benefits, cutting fuel consumption and also reducing emissions. Another feature of the engine is that it is mounted with the exhaust manifold facing the rear. This layout improves catalytic converter purifying performance and also contributes to making
the engine lighter and more compact.
It looks like the good old 4g63 is getting sidelined for a lighter aluminum block version.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #2025  
bounce's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I wouldn’t worry about the new engine making power. It was over-engineered to be able to deal with lots of power.

The engines are designed to be turbocharged and supercharged, partly through over-engineering of the block, and use of large water jackets and metal areas around each siamesed cylinder.
Source
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:47 PM.