Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

EVO X vs IX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2006 | 08:57 AM
  #31  
enjoku's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Funny coz everyone is Judging the Evo X even before it comes out by just looking at the concept X. We don't really know what it can do right now but we have a few hints on some possibilities in term of performance. Same thing happend when the 8 came out everyone like the 7's look and everyone tought the the 8 looked nasty with its frint bumper. Also Mitsu might be trying to design a better looking performance car, (Some people might disagree on the looks of the x but looks are subjective.) Woudn't you like a high performance car and some good looks to back it up? I'm sure the Evo 9 looks and performs really well but we'll all have to wait until we get our hands on the X till then evrything else is just mere speculation.

Thanks
Bye
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #32  
xhotaru's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: home
Pro:
more cars that will share the same power plant (but it's a dodge )
will bring mits out of dept ( more $ for research)
wife will like it
it will blend in a little more (less cop attention
...........
3k saved 4k to go
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 02:18 AM
  #33  
riceball777's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
performance wise the 10 is supose to beat the 9 in every way
but i do agree that it looks kinf if ugly
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #34  
StiChiara's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by fromWRXtoEVO
You are asking the Evo 9 owners to confirm facts right?:

1) No one knows how this new engine will perform agaisnt the Evo 9 engine
2) The turbo on the Evo X is positioned between the block and the firewall and people don't like that
3) the 4G63 despite being old is perhaps the best performance proven 4 cylinder in the world. Trying to compite agaisnt a 4G63 is a tough tough job.
4) New Evo X block on the Evo X looks like it will be made of aluminium vs cast iron on the 4G63
5) Another downside of the Evo X vs the Evo 9 is that it will truly take at least a year or so so start seing some aftermarket products while on the Evo 9 the same performance products will be available for dirt cheap and above all, the Evo 9 performance products are a 15 year certified 4G63 sucess.

The rest of the stuff is the matter of personal taste. I am not 100 % convinced on the new style but the drivetrain seems to be promising, in fact it will be the most advance AWD system in a production car in the market.

Carlos
Of course, if we don't even consider the next generation WRX STI due out about the same time.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #35  
IMR-TIM's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: NH
....can't compare a car that hasn't come out yet to anything. Nuff Said.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #36  
02BLUR's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Wa.
paddle shifters!!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #37  
SandSanta's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
The Evo X looks like a real car.

Not the speedracer **** I'm driving right now. Love the performance of the IX but as I grow older I want a more serious look.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #38  
evo/X's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: salt lake city
the evo X is definitley ruined just like they ruined the eclipse..the civic...etc.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 01:44 PM
  #39  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Agreed. It will go the way of the Eclipse. The 3G eclipse (stock) outperformed all prior eclipses too but it was not mod friendly. The only saving grace is that the engine platform will be shared by several mfrs.. so there will be an aftermarket eventually (unlike the new eclipse).
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #40  
FLK's Avatar
FLK
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: CNY
Originally Posted by IMR-TIM
....can't compare a car that hasn't come out yet to anything. Nuff Said.
+1
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 03:13 PM
  #41  
tvbf1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: California
I think it's a bit unfair to be judging so soon about the X. All we see is just pic and concepts of the X. Some of has seen the X in person and said that the thing is just so amazing.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #42  
XRS's Avatar
XRS
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, MN
I look at the X and it actually looks like a retro version of the V and VI. If I was mitsubishi, I would market it like that.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #43  
nashmage's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Dartmouth, Mass
im one of the few people who actually really like it and cant wait for it to come out. but i do agree i think alot more people will like it when they see it in person and see how it performs.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #44  
fostytou's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,143
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by SWOLN
For EVO X fans.

1. Turbo is in the back means better weight distribution.
2. Turbo in the back also means the exhaust doesn't wrap under the oil pan. Keeps engine cooler.
3. Intake manifold is in the front and can be bombarded by cool air.
4. Aluminum motors cool faster.
5. Aluminum motors are lighter.
6. The Chasis is stiffer than the IX (By 30% I think).
7. Most sophisticated AWD system yet.
8. I likey
1. Barely, especially not if you have to move the engine forward because of it
2. True, but it also means that the turbo isn't being cooled by outside air. Also means that its cramped around a tone of equipment... though theres inherantly nothing wrong with that. In the end, it prevents things like this from happening.
3. It doesn't matter as much where the intake manifold is on a turbo car, especially if you use a spacer
4. This one I'll give you (though obviously were picking advantages for racing here)
5. True, but they are much weaker as well. They won't hold up to higher boost, knock, and all of the other terrible things that you are accustomed to feeding your engine.
6-8. schwing!


They have the new SAWD system in some evo Xs for testing. People said it was an improvement even without the extra rigidity of the chassis.

That all said I like the look, but it is a totally different one for sure. I think the current evo is more towards function and the X is more towards form, but I'm sure we'll find out soon enough. Lets just hope they don't increase the price *too* much
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 05:40 AM
  #45  
SIKEVO9's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: New York
Im hearing that the X is going to be LESS FUN to drive. LESS FUN to MOD and that the X has many lean points on the vehicle. I own a 9MR. Car is crazy. Best car to ever own and driven.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:20 AM.