im still debating which one i should get.im just gonna need it to be tuned once then ill be leaving it alone or probly making another setting for daily driving.i tried to to some searches but had no help from it.so which is better? tia

 

the biggest differences are in the available RPM set points and the knock sensor. The SAFC does not have a knock readout but the SAFC-II does. Also, I think the SAFC-II can hold 2 separate settings, but I'm not sure. I'm using the SAFC and tune it myself with a wideband and data logger. Haven't had any problems.

 

hmm 2 settings is always good specially here in cali where 91 is the only gas that you can get not unless you go to places who sells 100oct.

 

hey evo dadi i gotta S-AFCII 4sale for ya..............$180.Pm me if interested.S-AFCII work perfect when tuned right,had it on my ride and it made a big difference.Going w/utec now............

-TRUST18G

 

go with the safc2

 

The SAFC2 also has password protection so people can't monkey around with your settings. Some think the SAFC's buttons are easier to use, but there's no reason to go with a SAFC over the II unless one is just a whole lot cheaper. But I doubt too many new SAFC are left.

Go with the II.

 

what wideband and datalogger setup did you go with?

 

II thats what i have looks better also

-Steve

 

I got a new AFC from my Eclipse days, just lying around. Anyone care to share how tough was to install and setup?