Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

Want to eliminate your MAF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 08:23 PM
  #211  
joeymia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
Originally Posted by dryad001
How about the PNP harness?
The universal harness is as PNP as it gets.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #212  
joeymia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
Since this not a UTEC related anymore what do you guys think if I ask a mod to move this into the Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Forum? Lots of good information in here would hate for someone to miss this thread.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #213  
GraphiteMR's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Just FYI those with the AEM map sensor, TurboBob is currently working out the calibration for the 3.5bar sensor vs. the 3bar GM unit. Bob, can you comment on when this calibration option will be completed?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 04:28 AM
  #214  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by joeymia
The universal harness is as PNP as it gets.
There may be some additional options for this one too soon..

I'm in Ohio (Columbus) right now on a business trip so my "Car stuff" is on hold for the week.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #215  
EvoTech's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by joeymia
Since this not a UTEC related anymore what do you guys think if I ask a mod to move this into the Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Forum? Lots of good information in here would hate for someone to miss this thread.

Can you ask a mod to copy it and not move it? I think Turbo XS needs to see this in the UTEC forum and realize by the size of this thread how much interest there is in this. Please do not move it. Just copy it.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 06:00 AM
  #216  
GraphiteMR's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Many could care less about the UTEC. The demand may not be as great as you describe. I do not intend on using UTEC, and why should anyone if they are adding timing control to the MAFTpro in future updates. It already controls boost and tracks AFR. I don't see any benefit in UTEC. UTEC is for the wrx's
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 07:16 AM
  #217  
EvoTech's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by GraphiteMR
Many could care less about the UTEC. The demand may not be as great as you describe. I do not intend on using UTEC, and why should anyone if they are adding timing control to the MAFTpro in future updates. It already controls boost and tracks AFR. I don't see any benefit in UTEC. UTEC is for the wrx's

Many people do not want to give up the added features that the UTEC offers. Injector scaling, launch conrtrol, the ability to raise the Rev limiter, shift light outputs, spare solenoid control etc.. These are important features for some of us. Also how can you say that the demand is not that great? This thread is 15 pages in about 1 week. I would say that is indicative of a great interest.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 08:05 AM
  #218  
GraphiteMR's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by EvoTech
Many people do not want to give up the added features that the UTEC offers. Injector scaling, launch conrtrol, the ability to raise the Rev limiter, shift light outputs, spare solenoid control etc.. These are important features for some of us. Also how can you say that the demand is not that great? This thread is 15 pages in about 1 week. I would say that is indicative of a great interest.
You and Jack, period. 15 pages in interested parties seeing an alternative to $2200 tuned AEM system for $600. MAF deletion on stock ECU is the attraction, not UTEC compatibility.

Last edited by GraphiteMR; Oct 19, 2005 at 08:15 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 11:09 AM
  #219  
EvoTech's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
Ok I guess you must be right because you say so. No one other than Malibujack and I are interested in making this work with the UTEC Not worth arguing about. Peace and Im out
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 11:19 AM
  #220  
Nez136's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Yea, i think i would also have to disagree with that statement, damnit how long have us Utec owners been *****ing about eliminating the stock MAF!?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #221  
Killboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
From: Robbinsville, NC
Originally Posted by GraphiteMR
You and Jack, period. 15 pages in interested parties seeing an alternative to $2200 tuned AEM system for $600. MAF deletion on stock ECU is the attraction, not UTEC compatibility.
In a word: Wrong.

I'm just watching the thread to see what develops. I'd like to incorporate it with all of the features of my UTEC, thank you very much.

With over 3600 thread views, I doubt I'm the only lurker.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #222  
joeymia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
The problem with MAFTpro is that it provides so many features that it would be a shame to let them all go to waste. The only feature I miss is the ability to view knock.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #223  
joeymia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
I just noticed they opened up a ECU+ subforum... I am going to request a MAFTpro subforum
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #224  
joeymia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh....php?p=2463606

Post in there so we can get our own forum for this product
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #225  
EvoTech's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by joeymia
The problem with MAFTpro is that it provides so many features that it would be a shame to let them all go to waste. The only feature I miss is the ability to view knock.
You should talk to the developers about incorporating that feature. As you know, it is an important one.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:45 PM.