Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

Go or no go with turBO?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 11:01 PM
  #76  
akasirlancerlot's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles California
gentle ride... man i dunno my ride is pretty bumpy.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 11:04 PM
  #77  
frchgl123's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Garand
If your buying a Brand new car, and your considering buying a Lancer then Turboing it, that is plain stupid. Sorry, it is. So many better cars out their that respond better to upgrades, have more upgrades and perform just leaps-and-bounds better. There is a reason why the Lancer isnt a hit sport compact.
But that doesn't mean you can't enjoy it! I understand what you mean and the whole "reality" of it, but I also take a lil pride in any vehicle I drive. I have been saving as much as I can for awhile now and oneside of my brain thinks about buying another car that is "better", but then the otherside says f*ck it dump it all into the Lancer!! No matter what I do, I will always what it faster. Remember putting self greasing bearings in your skateboard...
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #78  
Handmemyarms's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
From: the OC
there are always going to be certian classification of cars, trying to tell someone to buy a faster car sounds like the right idea and the logic sounds right.... however, the majority of people on this site or any car site for that matter arent exactly on it to keep their cars stock, moddification is both a hobby and a passion, if your so hung up on tell people that they should just buy a different car, go tell the evo guys to go buy a ferrari (excuse spelling errors, i got 5 new castles in me)
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #79  
Hotshot940's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Hey Gerand - hopefully this is the last time i address your ignorance, but need I point something out to your denseness.

You claim that there are cars out there that respond to upgrades better? Ok, well unless its drastically better, im unconvinced by your stupid, unsupportive comments. Show me a car that you can throw 9 psi of boost in on stock motor and it will gain NEARLY 150 whp.

Do some research before you make stupid *** comments, your wasting my time, i can't sit here all night and give you reasons why everything your saying is stupid, ignorant, and unsupported.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:26 AM
  #80  
Garand's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hotshot940
Hey Gerand - hopefully this is the last time i address your ignorance, but need I point something out to your denseness.

You claim that there are cars out there that respond to upgrades better? Ok, well unless its drastically better, im unconvinced by your stupid, unsupportive comments. Show me a car that you can throw 9 psi of boost in on stock motor and it will gain NEARLY 150 whp.

Do some research before you make stupid *** comments, your wasting my time, i can't sit here all night and give you reasons why everything your saying is stupid, ignorant, and unsupported.
Oh yes, because boost is the end all mod and all cars should be judged based on how much boost stock internals can handel. What about simple chipping, cat-backs and suspension upgrades? What about putting in a larger turbo?
Want responsiveness for under 10k? Try a Turbo DSM. Seen plenty with 300whp, running strong and on stock internals for a mere fraction of the cost for a Lancer Turbo Kit.

Like I said ealier, if the Lancers 2.0l is so great, why has it never caugt on?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:35 AM
  #81  
Garand's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hotshot940
2) Nobody said they are better buys, and nobody said they are wasting any of those cars. People have said that for less money, and less insurance, a turbo lancer with the right mods will RUN WITH SAID VEHICLES (take notice to bold type). If you can find anywhere on this forum w here it says a turbo lancer WASTES an evo, humor me, please, i could use it.
Originally Posted by Hotshot940
As for prices, you could easily find a Lancer for 10k or probabaly even less, and throw turbo and whatnot on it and smoke WRX, new ones are 24-26k, used you could find for prolly 10k w/ 150,000 miles. more around 13-17k used i would think. not to mention stock wrx is not very strong at all. Power is easily extracted however.
Originally Posted by Hotshot940
think of it this way, you can get a lancer anywhere from like 10-16k, throw on a turbo with the right mods, and run with srt-4s which is also a FWD sedan all day, for an equal or cheaper price, reliably. I've heard of just as many srt4s which come turbo from the factory have problems and issues as i've heard of turbo lancers blowing up and whatnot. 98% of turbo lancer problems are install, maintnence, common sence errors, i mean, letting an oil leak go for months at a time or somethign stupid like that? what else do you expect??? Use your head, protect your investment, and have confidence.
Originally Posted by TeamFlare
Saweet. So with the right mods, I WILL kill my friends
brand new SRT-4.
Originally Posted by OZLancer1
Yeah, it's definitly possible!
Originally Posted by Viciouz
yah it does... i smoke so many cars its funny, when a lancer begins to pull on you


Is that what they call "right from the horses mouth"? I'm getting a lecture on being educated and ignorate? Ha!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:38 AM
  #82  
imapunkclaimer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: Southern Orange County
what are you quoting? it looks like the other guys are backing up what he said...
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #83  
Hotshot940's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
lol, its ok marc, this guy is a little slow.

he doesn't realize quite a few things, if he doesn't own an srt4, he should go buy one becuase he acts like half those jackasses.

I don't have time to negate everything he has said, once again, seeing as though i have to go to class, maybe when i come back tho. I was thinking that all this arguing was bad for this thread, but after reading some of this stuff i think its just motivation to keep modding
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 10:35 AM
  #84  
Hotshot940's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
OK, i hope that you take the time to read this carefully so that you don't make yourself sound stupid again.

You quote me as saying I will smoke a factory WRX. I will. Nice job of pointing out my correctness.

Oh, you got me here, you quote me on saying that i will RUN with an SRT4. Yeah congatulations holmes, I'll run with one, i don't see mention of smoking in there anywhere. Then you highlight me saying that i have heard of problems with factory srt4s? yeah, your point? my friend bought one and it blew up on him twice and he had it replaced by dodge and that was after adding only a cold air intake. you got me again with that one.

TeamFlares comment should have a question mark at the end of it, seeing as how i was comparing the SRT and the turbo lancer, and it seems more appropriate that he is wondering if he will beat the SRT4, considering he doesn't even have a turbo so he wouldn't know of its potential. Once again, being ignorant, quoting people that don't even have turbo. Another point for you.

You quote OZLancer1 as saying "yeah, its definitly possible". It's definitly possible of what? You leaving these forums, you being homosexual, you driving a slower car than a factory lancer and being pissed that we are actually making power? you having so little of a life that you have to come on these boards and try to degrade our having fun? Yeah, it definitly is possible.

Need I direct you to the use of the english language for your last quote...There is a certain few words in that quote that most people who speak fluent english notice. The same people that notice these words are the people that read what you type in every one of your posts and realize your stupid. He said that he SMOKES SO MANY CARS ITS FUNNY. Ok, well he smokes what? he didn't say evo, sti, srt4, msp, or any of your "supercars". He said he smokes SO MANY CARS. Not, so many of THOSE cars. Learn to read. On top of his VALID statement, he even humbles himself in saying that its sad that a LANCER is beating other cars on the road becuase the lancer is a dog from the factory. It's not fast and it wasn't ment to be fast, he isn't claiming he drives the sickest car around, he is saying its SAD that he is beating other cars.

Well I think that about does it, I will probably be resigning from evom now that you have shut me down so badly, I'm pretty embarassed that you have brought up so many great points to make me look stupid. I was truly owned by your research and you have truly outsmarted me. I hope all lancer owners read your posts and realize how incredibly correct you are, in fact, i hope that you go to every forum and tell everyone that ever thinks of modding their stock car not to so that they don't make the same stupid stupid mistakes that everyone with a turbo lancer has made. Man, we are stupid, thanks for helping us realize it.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #85  
livelyjay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Reston, VA
ROFL
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #86  
BBYBruno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Eastlake, OH
garand your an idiot. please stop posting here and get off our forums. thank you.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #87  
Garand's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BBYBruno
garand your an idiot. please stop posting here and get off our forums. thank you.
Then enjoy your metaphorical equivalent to a 2.0L 8V Volkswagen Jetta.

Stage II, 200HP for only $3,000

Your truely ignorant if you think a $5,000 turbo makes your car run with the big dogs.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #88  
pgmike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Originally Posted by Garand
Then enjoy your metaphorical equivalent to a 2.0L 8V Volkswagen Jetta.

Stage II, 200HP for only $3,000

Your truely ignorant if you think a $5,000 turbo makes your car run with the big dogs.
what do you consider a big dog?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #89  
Garand's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pgmike
what do you consider a big dog?

Your mom

This thread has become about semantics and character assassination and not facts. Better to be thought ignorant then to continue with this childish crap.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 12:49 PM
  #90  
bahamut's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
From: TB, FL
Originally Posted by Garand
Want responsiveness for under 10k? Try a Turbo DSM. Seen plenty with 300whp, running strong and on stock internals for a mere fraction of the cost for a Lancer Turbo Kit.
One flaw that most people have forgotten, except for "realist" DSM'ers. DSMs are getting fast extinct because of age and wear and tear. The older the 2g = higher possibilty of crankwalk; therefore, they usually try to pull the carcass from a 1g DSM.

There is a reason why DSM'ers have a crack/motto against ourselves: "making mechanics out if us since 89". Only arrogant or diehard DSM'ers refuse to believe this mantra.

Last edited by bahamut; Apr 11, 2005 at 01:57 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:47 PM.