Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

what is the weakest link in the lancer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #76  
Evo666's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 458
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, Wa.
you know you guys are really getting technical with this
Old May 15, 2006 | 07:38 AM
  #77  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Originally Posted by Evo666
you know you guys are really getting technical with this
If I knew how, I'd split the thread...
Old May 15, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #78  
ExcessLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: ATLANTA
Originally Posted by Chewie4299
Stick it in their face...tell them that the lancer was first...mitsu decided to use the platform to build their rally supercar....so without your lancer...they would have no evo. Also they are TOTALLY different cars and they are stupid to compare the cars....your car isnt in the same class. That's like comparing an RSX to a Ford Powerstroke Diesel.....it makes no sense.

I have people come up to me ALL THE TIME and call my car a lancer. I get pissed cuz they dont realize that it's not a lancer....they are different cars. IMO the Lancer is the econobox to go with if that's the class of car you are lookin for. I like the styling WAY better than corollas, civics, neons, whatever else falls into that category. And if you are in the market for a street legal race car....evo lol

As for the engines being similar.......no

the 4G63 in the evo has been used for....what is it? almost 2 decades now? I mean obviously the one in the evo is different than in old DSMs but these engines are awesome. The 4G94 in the lancer....isn't anything special. Im not saying it's crap...i had a 2003 OZ before the evo and I know what you can do with that engine. With some work you can make good power.
Your car IS A LANCER!! Face it!!!!!! it is the "Evolution" lancer just like these jis a "ralliart" lancer and "OZrally" lancer. That is why the word lancer is always on EVOs yes it is better faster etc. but it will always be a lancer and a damn good one at that!
Old May 15, 2006 | 10:52 AM
  #79  
Worf's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
been folowing this thread for awhile now, decited to post my opinion on whats wrong with RA Lancer and what to change to make 1 sick car..

unlike OZ/ES Lancers we get a good engine 4G69 with MiVec...
i had dynoed in Canada at 147hp/155TQ stock...

Problems/ Recomedations for a MUST parts

1. Car is suffocating...in 1 place on exhaust it goes down to 3/4"x 4" squished pipe.
when doing the exhaust go to 2 1/"2 from start in case you want to turbo later...
its not to big for N/A.

2. CAI helps huge. get a 2 piece set up so you can make it into a short ram for fall/winter rain/snow.

3. Underdrive pulley a must. (currently gained 12hp/13TQ from stock with pulley/CAI)

4. Intake manifold port/polish .

5. Exhaust manifold to help with heat.

6. Aluminium flywheel.

7. Lower vehicle by either going to coilovers(prefered) or lowered springs.

8. Bigger anti-sway bars.

9. Rear strut bar

10. Bigger throtle body.

11. LSD

Possible mods..not nessesary...depends what you want to have done at the end.
this is where its starting to get expansive,,,,

12. Walbro fuel .

13. Higher compression pistons.

14. Better rods

15. Might aswell do a overbore while the pistons are out.

16. Port and Polish the head.

17. Injectors

Should be around 210-225 whp around here...

turbo from here now that your motor is ready run around 11-15PSI and you have 1 hell of the street/drag/autocross killer.

AND now for the finalle...you done 20k worth of mods...should have bought an EVO>...hahahahha


Please feel free to take my theories apart, ...I would be glad to lear something....

Last edited by Worf; May 15, 2006 at 02:43 PM.
Old May 15, 2006 | 03:53 PM
  #80  
arnold16890's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 696
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
lol comparing lancers to evo's is like comparing cats and cheetahs; true, they look similar, but woohoo who goes faster?

i regret getting my lancer tho... coulda spend the same amount on a used subby... a good 2.5rs or a high mileage bug-eye...
Old May 15, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #81  
ExcessLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: ATLANTA
Originally Posted by arnold16890
lol comparing lancers to evo's is like comparing cats and cheetahs; true, they look similar, but woohoo who goes faster?

i regret getting my lancer tho... coulda spend the same amount on a used subby... a good 2.5rs or a high mileage bug-eye...
My lancer is my first car and I am not into driving fast so it is cool for a first car but my next car will be an 06 PASSAT 2.0T
after that i will get the S4 waggon...
Old May 15, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #82  
mitsuozboi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 1
From: Waterville, ME
Originally Posted by ExcessLancer
My lancer is my first car and I am not into driving fast

WHAT?!?!? thats unamrican!
Old May 16, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #83  
rcefstsfecr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Worf
been folowing this thread for awhile now, decited to post my opinion on whats wrong with RA Lancer and what to change to make 1 sick car..

unlike OZ/ES Lancers we get a good engine 4G69 with MiVec...
i had dynoed in Canada at 147hp/155TQ stock...

Problems/ Recomedations for a MUST parts

1. Car is suffocating...in 1 place on exhaust it goes down to 3/4"x 4" squished pipe.
when doing the exhaust go to 2 1/"2 from start in case you want to turbo later...
its not to big for N/A.

2. CAI helps huge. get a 2 piece set up so you can make it into a short ram for fall/winter rain/snow.

3. Underdrive pulley a must. (currently gained 12hp/13TQ from stock with pulley/CAI)

4. Intake manifold port/polish .

5. Exhaust manifold to help with heat.

6. Aluminium flywheel.

7. Lower vehicle by either going to coilovers(prefered) or lowered springs.

8. Bigger anti-sway bars.

9. Rear strut bar

10. Bigger throtle body.

11. LSD

Possible mods..not nessesary...depends what you want to have done at the end.
this is where its starting to get expansive,,,,

12. Walbro fuel .

13. Higher compression pistons.

14. Better rods

15. Might aswell do a overbore while the pistons are out.

16. Port and Polish the head.

17. Injectors

Should be around 210-225 whp around here...

turbo from here now that your motor is ready run around 11-15PSI and you have 1 hell of the street/drag/autocross killer.

AND now for the finalle...you done 20k worth of mods...should have bought an EVO>...hahahahha


Please feel free to take my theories apart, ...I would be glad to lear something....
You can't much bore out the pistons/engine. The 4g94 is already a bored out 4g93 from a Mirage.
Old May 16, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #84  
modelchris's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Originally Posted by Handmemyarms
ive gotten in plenty of fights with evo owners who call my car a piece of **** and a cheap rip off of an evo and "not worthy of the lancer name"

evo owners are some cocky bastards at times

hey..uhh, i hate to break it to ya, but they kinda can be [cocky bastards]. Look at what they drive...
Old May 16, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #85  
ExcessLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: ATLANTA
Originally Posted by mitsuozboi
WHAT?!?!? thats unamrican!
I am british....LOL
Old May 16, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #86  
04ozrally's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Texas
You and me both, I definately would have went with a bug eye.
Old May 17, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #87  
MIA2FASLANCER's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Miami
well if you invest a good 2,000 on the car it will defenitly be much faster than stock and migth be able to take a ralliart
i take civics with intake exaust all the time
with intake,header,pulley,piggy , cat back exaust,intake manifold, throttle body,highflow cat and good tuning
your set for a good 135 whp 140 wtq
Old May 17, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #88  
Worf's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by MIA2FASLANCER
well if you invest a good 2,000 on the car it will defenitly be much faster than stock and migth be able to take a ralliart
i take civics with intake exaust all the time
with intake,header,pulley,piggy , cat back exaust,intake manifold, throttle body,highflow cat and good tuning
your set for a good 135 whp 140 wtq
still puts you 11whp and 15 wtq behind the stock RA...

mine dynoed at 146whp/155wtg at stock

and 160whp/167wtq with intake/pulley
Old May 17, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #89  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Originally Posted by rcefstsfecr
You can't much bore out the pistons/engine. The 4g94 is already a bored out 4g93 from a Mirage.
It's bored half a millimeter.

It's stroked a few millimeters, however.

Know what you're talking about?
Old May 17, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #90  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Now that we're just fighting and spreading bad info, this is dying. Bye bye!




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 PM.