Mirage / Lancer Compatibility?
Originally Posted by grubiaco
the only reason why I asked is because I know in some cases you can off set the two and still get to it. I havne't replaced my clutch for my lancer yet, so I was just asking.
On the lancer... you've gotta pull it off.
my question is as follows:
1. 4g93 and 4g94 share the same short block with different displacement values. does this mean that aftermarket con rods from a mirage will swap into the lancer?
2. mirage and lancers have the same cylinder head only the mirage has a more agressive grind on the cam. however, will aftermarket valve springs from a mirage work with the lancer?
mark
1. 4g93 and 4g94 share the same short block with different displacement values. does this mean that aftermarket con rods from a mirage will swap into the lancer?
2. mirage and lancers have the same cylinder head only the mirage has a more agressive grind on the cam. however, will aftermarket valve springs from a mirage work with the lancer?
mark
Rods - highly doubt it. The displacement difference is as such:
Mirage:
Bore - 81
Stroke - 89
Lancer:
Bore - 81.5
Stroke - 95.8
Mark, I don't think I need to explain why the rods probably don't work...
(For those who don't follow me, the 6.8 mm difference in stroke)
--------------
Valve springs - I'd assume so, just because it's the exact same head (part number and everything)
-----------------
PS - Boe doesn't come on anymore, so you'd wanna PM him.
Mirage:
Bore - 81
Stroke - 89
Lancer:
Bore - 81.5
Stroke - 95.8
Mark, I don't think I need to explain why the rods probably don't work...
(For those who don't follow me, the 6.8 mm difference in stroke)
--------------
Valve springs - I'd assume so, just because it's the exact same head (part number and everything)
-----------------
PS - Boe doesn't come on anymore, so you'd wanna PM him.
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj
Mark, I don't think I need to explain why the rods probably don't work...
(For those who don't follow me, the 6.8 mm difference in stroke)
(For those who don't follow me, the 6.8 mm difference in stroke)
good call
you can't rule out the possibility that the rods may work. if you increased stroke but kept the same length rods from the mirage, the fact is that the 4g94 block is taller which may negate the use of shorter rods.
EDIT: welps, did a check. different part numbers between the g93 and g94 rods. it doesn't mean they can't be machined to work.
EDIT: welps, did a check. different part numbers between the g93 and g94 rods. it doesn't mean they can't be machined to work.
Last edited by rhyzin; Jun 5, 2006 at 09:37 AM.
Originally Posted by gregivq
I wish it could be N/A but I know that's impossible.
^^ Yeah - you're talking full port and polish, new head, cams, full engine management, higher compression pistons, head gasket, the works! But we'll wait to see what this engine as got.
Originally Posted by Gungrave
Hi I am new here so I think your gona be interest how many hp I took to my
Mirage LS with 4g94 engine block 176hp with 158 torque.

Mirage LS with 4g94 engine block 176hp with 158 torque.

Only 1 G93 owner swapped to a G94 before swapping to an Evo +4 in the US. The 2nd guys hasn't been confirmed. This isn't a cost effective way. You can spec a G93 similar to a G94 like AQ who now owns a RA. Also, there are 2 others with a G15 swapping to a G94, not confirmed again.


