Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

2008 BSP Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #241  
7oey's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I was wondering I see a lot of evos in bsp and sm that run 18x9/10 but i don't see a lot of people running 17x9/10. Is there an advantage to a larger diameter rim? I would think weight would keep people from going up in size. Is it just mainly for the lower profile tire? For example hoosier a6 has 295/35/17 and 295/30/18. All the tire specs seem the same(i.e. weight, section width, overall height, etc). Just wondering.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #242  
griceiv's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 71
From: LA, CA
the tire size the is the major factor. the 285/30-18 is the hotness.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #243  
7oey's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
is that on a 9.5 or 10" wide rim
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #244  
griceiv's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 71
From: LA, CA
Originally Posted by 7oey
is that on a 9.5 or 10" wide rim

...yes.

either size works well. the 10" or even 10.5" should theoretically be better, but most would be hard pressed to tell a difference performance wise.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #245  
griceiv's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 71
From: LA, CA
Might as well share the experience of what will turn out to be a slightly over budget weekend.

http://blip.tv/file/789638/


ok interesting comparison between bsp and stu. If you open up Max Hayter's runs and hit play on Tom's run when max's light goes green they sync up pretty good.

Last edited by griceiv; Apr 2, 2008 at 12:24 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #246  
jbrennen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by 7oey
is that on a 9.5 or 10" wide rim
I run the 285/30R18 on 18x10 CCWs.

Once you get into the 18x9.5, 18x10, 18x10.5 range, like Marshall said, it will be difficult to tell a performance difference. From my experience, there are three main things to consider -- weight, fitment (spacer needed? how thick?), and availability.

When I got my 18x10s, which was three years ago, availability outweighed weight and fitment, so I have relatively heavy wheels and use 13mm front spacers. However, since the CCWs are custom, I was able to get the exact backspacing that I wanted (just enough to clear the trailing arm in the rear).

I could probably do better now -- there are more wheels available with verified fitment.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #247  
7oey's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
is thereany nationally competitive evos the run 17x10s currently?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #248  
point&shoot's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, MA
Originally Posted by jbrennen
Only that Tom was shining a flashlight down into the spark plug holes and said that it looked like something had been bouncing around in there...
Hmmm. The only thing that would "bounce around in there" would be a piece of a valve, wouldn't it? And that should only happen if your timing belt breaks or slips a couple of notches, or if one of your connecting rods lets go and allows the piston to fly up and whack the valves. But the stock connecting rod bolts are supposed to be pretty safe up to about 7800 RPM, from what I've heard. Anyone heard differently? Was Tom running higher than 7800 RPM without replacing the conn-rod bolts?

Anyway, my understanding is that the biggest danger for us mildly tuned SP guys is that you get a tank of gas that doesn't have the octane you think it does, and you run too advanced or too lean and you burn your turbo and melt it. Sad, but not nearly as expensive as what seems to have happened to Tom.

Since I'm about to tune my car for 105 race gas, I'm anxious to hear more about this "incident".

Mike
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #249  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by point&shoot
But the stock connecting rod bolts are supposed to be pretty safe up to about 7800 RPM, from what I've heard. Anyone heard differently? Was Tom running higher than 7800 RPM without replacing the conn-rod bolts?
This was the exact question I was about to ask.

What rev limit were you guys running?

d
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #250  
flmjr's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: phoenix
Sorry to hear that you guys popped an engine at El Toro.

Maybe I should have gone to El Toro after all. I may be able to go faster than a broken EVO. But my butt is still sore from the kicking it got at San Diego. Plus, I want to preserve the new transfer case, rear end and clutch. Once a year is more than I care to replace those items.

I think that I may back my rev limiter down a bit. It is currently at 8000rpm.

Frank
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #251  
GTLocke13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 667
Likes: 1
From: Yorklyn, DE
Originally Posted by point&shoot
Hmmm. The only thing that would "bounce around in there" would be a piece of a valve, wouldn't it?
I've seen spark plugs come apart and bounce the ground electrode around the cylinder.

Sounds like its time for a 2.3 short block and move on to SM... Sorry to hear about the motor, I hope you guys can piece it back together.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #252  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
No, SM is too slow. Stick with BSP!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #253  
griceiv's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 71
From: LA, CA
Rev limiter is ~7600 and the engine doesn't make any unusual mechanical sounds other then running on 3 cyldiners/obvious lack of compression. The sparkplugs were all intact (although one plug had the gap 'adjusted'). The damaged plug looked more like it had aluminum depsoits on it rather then something bouncing around aside from the closed gap. Prime suspect is bad gas with inadequate knock compensation leading to melted piston (or whatever else happens when you have insufficient octane level).

does anyone know of a place you can test gas for octane rating?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #254  
griceiv's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 71
From: LA, CA
Originally Posted by GTLocke13
Sounds like its time for a 2.3 short block and move on to SM... Sorry to hear about the motor, I hope you guys can piece it back together.

BTW, I like the way this guy thinks!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #255  
SS RX7 r2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by griceiv
Rev limiter is ~7600 and the engine doesn't make any unusual mechanical sounds other then running on 3 cyldiners/obvious lack of compression. The sparkplugs were all intact (although one plug had the gap 'adjusted'). The damaged plug looked more like it had aluminum depsoits on it rather then something bouncing around aside from the closed gap. Prime suspect is bad gas with inadequate knock compensation leading to melted piston (or whatever else happens when you have insufficient octane level).

does anyone know of a place you can test gas for octane rating?
Yeah, I wonder about that source. My car was making good power that day on the same fuel, but I was tuned on 97-98 oct. on a 100 deg day.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:39 AM.