Evolution Dynamics Pikes Peak Build

The further out the splitter extends the more air it will force above the car.
Pretend I was driving my car down a deep snowy road. Think of what splitter would catch more snow. The long splitter will grab more snow and keep it above the splitter and force it above the car.
Ironically I tested my splitter in the winter. If it handles snow load it's good. It didn't. I'm not talking about distance outward. I understand that. I'm talking bout distance off surface of road
We're looking for a Venturi behind the splitter right?
Lol@ Dave
We're looking for a Venturi behind the splitter right?
Lol@ Dave
Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Jul 6, 2012 at 11:03 AM.
It's also why the velocity above and below the car isn't as significant as it would be for an airfoil in open air (like a tall rear wing).
The rear diffuser volume is what drives the underbody, but don't make it to steep to cause flow separation 7-10deg seems to be the norm). Sealing off the side skirts with the ground also keeps the higher pressure air along the side of the car from spilling into the underside reducing the speed and increasing the pressure.
It's also the same article where I got the idea for the wicker in front of my hood vent. It was "accidentally" tested and I know it works.
To a certain extent yes, but not alway. I read a an article on a wind tunnel test of a Jaguar or Aston Martin GT car where they tested various undertray heights. If they went too low they eventualy reduced downforce. This was several years ago, so my memory could be foggy.
It's also the same article where I got the idea for the wicker in front of my hood vent. It was "accidentally" tested and I know it works.
It's also the same article where I got the idea for the wicker in front of my hood vent. It was "accidentally" tested and I know it works.
We ran a floating undertray on older Uta fsae cars. It was fixed at about an inch off the ground and didn't fluctuate with speed from downforce, suspension travel from bumps, and it worked fantastic. Only problem was it was very heavy due to needing to be very rigid (only four mounting points at exterior corners). Our later fsae cars still incorporated the undertrays, but it was sprung aero and would fluctuate with speed and suspension travel. Even still, it worked well without any dramatic drop off in downforce when compression was high. I also read that to low can cause a drop off in downforce, but it has to be nearly scrapping the ground before that happens






