TeeJay's Quest For 700+whp Stock Block discussion thread
Is the car going to be run at the track after it meets the dyno goal? The ETS X just went 10.8@133.
Appreciate it! Fly in from Germany and check it out this Friday, your welcome to come to the tuning session. We have nothing to hide
[/quote]We dont?!
Man I wish, dont think Uncle Sam would let me fly just to see the tuning of this car, Good Luck guys
[/quote]Uncle TeeJay will, i'll send a Fedex call tag
TJ its funny how people hate but once we get the final numbers out & hit the track it will be cool...when you planning on going to the track anyway as soon as you get it back?
& people understand we are not trying to blow up the motor just push it to the extreme limits even if it means blowing it so don't take that wrong
& people understand we are not trying to blow up the motor just push it to the extreme limits even if it means blowing it so don't take that wrong
That correction factor is serious. Good luck breaking a record that no one cares about kid. Also...700 has already been broken on a stock motor outside this forum so many people here call "world". I would tell you what part will most likely fail, but since the car is making 100+ less than what the dyno says, it will probably hold together just fine
hehe
Not everything happens on the internet.
There are privately owned evo's out there that are faster (power and time wise) than some shop cars on the forum, but the owners don't care enough or want to publicize it.
Some people actually like to avoid the exposure and attention...... imagine that
Scorke
There are privately owned evo's out there that are faster (power and time wise) than some shop cars on the forum, but the owners don't care enough or want to publicize it.
Some people actually like to avoid the exposure and attention...... imagine that
Scorke
From my own experience, 1.0CF DD dyno to dynojet is around a 1.11.
How bout this, How bout we hit 800 with the infamous 1.2CF and then drop it down to 1.0, 1.1 or whatever the hell you want and i'll eat 700. Then i go shyt on a dynojet when i'm done..
btw, tell eric i said "Hallo!"
Thanks for that info on the CFs. Like i stated earlier in the thread, i'm new to this whole correction factor bizness. It was always either "i made 500hp on a mustang, and then i made 575 on a dynojet..." Always knew that mustangs and DD were conservative, just never knew about "fluffin" numbers. Personally, i don't like it and now that i know about it, things are going to be a little bit different on Friday. Once we are all done, i will have Charlie load the 93oct street tune map and make a (0)CF pass, then a (1.0)CF and a (1.2)CF to compare the differences. Unless it can be done mathamaticly, then there's no point. Once she is back in my hands, i will be going down to Maryland to run on a Mustang (Friends Shop), the up to PA on a Dynopack (Evans) and then on a Dynojet (not sure where).
You stated "no one was talkin shyt" and i pointed to exactly where the shyt talking took place. No you wanna bounce to the 1.2CF. You can't even stay on YOUR OWN topic.
How bout this, How bout we hit 800 with the infamous 1.2CF and then drop it down to 1.0, 1.1 or whatever the hell you want and i'll eat 700. Then i go shyt on a dynojet when i'm done..
btw, tell eric i said "Hallo!"
How bout this, How bout we hit 800 with the infamous 1.2CF and then drop it down to 1.0, 1.1 or whatever the hell you want and i'll eat 700. Then i go shyt on a dynojet when i'm done..
btw, tell eric i said "Hallo!"
Again, best of luck with the build
Evolved Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: UNITED KINGDOM
Hello guys,
Now this is emabarrasing for me, spoke to my tuner after a couple of pm's from guys on here and it turns out our issue was map sensor related. When I spoke to him last he explained the map sensor and why it causes issues on the evo x, i just assumed if he knew all that then that couldnt possibly be the problem.
Having asked for some info today whilst he had time to talk to me he explained that feeling is directly related to the map sensor and certain tables within the ecu.
Kind regards,
GUM
Now this is emabarrasing for me, spoke to my tuner after a couple of pm's from guys on here and it turns out our issue was map sensor related. When I spoke to him last he explained the map sensor and why it causes issues on the evo x, i just assumed if he knew all that then that couldnt possibly be the problem.
Having asked for some info today whilst he had time to talk to me he explained that feeling is directly related to the map sensor and certain tables within the ecu.
Kind regards,
GUM
Hello guys,
Now this is emabarrasing for me, spoke to my tuner after a couple of pm's from guys on here and it turns out our issue was map sensor related. When I spoke to him last he explained the map sensor and why it causes issues on the evo x, i just assumed if he knew all that then that couldnt possibly be the problem.
Having asked for some info today whilst he had time to talk to me he explained that feeling is directly related to the map sensor and certain tables within the ecu.
Kind regards,
GUM
Now this is emabarrasing for me, spoke to my tuner after a couple of pm's from guys on here and it turns out our issue was map sensor related. When I spoke to him last he explained the map sensor and why it causes issues on the evo x, i just assumed if he knew all that then that couldnt possibly be the problem.
Having asked for some info today whilst he had time to talk to me he explained that feeling is directly related to the map sensor and certain tables within the ecu.
Kind regards,
GUM
Yea we will run it in shoot44. We honestly don't care about the whole correction business anymore. Our numbers are right inline with ETS and the dynojet their car was on. Whether you guys believe a 1.2CF is too high, it matched ETS's build and we have the same freaking parts!!!
We will leave the car on a 1.0 or shoot44.
We will leave the car on a 1.0 or shoot44.
You stated "no one was talkin shyt" and i pointed to exactly where the shyt talking took place. No you wanna bounce to the 1.2CF. You can't even stay on YOUR OWN topic.
How bout this, How bout we hit 800 with the infamous 1.2CF and then drop it down to 1.0, 1.1 or whatever the hell you want and i'll eat 700. Then i go shyt on a dynojet when i'm done..
btw, tell eric i said "Hallo!"
Thanks for that info on the CFs. Like i stated earlier in the thread, i'm new to this whole correction factor bizness. It was always either "i made 500hp on a mustang, and then i made 575 on a dynojet..." Always knew that mustangs and DD were conservative, just never knew about "fluffin" numbers. Personally, i don't like it and now that i know about it, things are going to be a little bit different on Friday. Once we are all done, i will have Charlie load the 93oct street tune map and make a (0)CF pass, then a (1.0)CF and a (1.2)CF to compare the differences. Unless it can be done mathamaticly, then there's no point. Once she is back in my hands, i will be going down to Maryland to run on a Mustang (Friends Shop), the up to PA on a Dynopack (Evans) and then on a Dynojet (not sure where).
How bout this, How bout we hit 800 with the infamous 1.2CF and then drop it down to 1.0, 1.1 or whatever the hell you want and i'll eat 700. Then i go shyt on a dynojet when i'm done..
btw, tell eric i said "Hallo!"
Thanks for that info on the CFs. Like i stated earlier in the thread, i'm new to this whole correction factor bizness. It was always either "i made 500hp on a mustang, and then i made 575 on a dynojet..." Always knew that mustangs and DD were conservative, just never knew about "fluffin" numbers. Personally, i don't like it and now that i know about it, things are going to be a little bit different on Friday. Once we are all done, i will have Charlie load the 93oct street tune map and make a (0)CF pass, then a (1.0)CF and a (1.2)CF to compare the differences. Unless it can be done mathamaticly, then there's no point. Once she is back in my hands, i will be going down to Maryland to run on a Mustang (Friends Shop), the up to PA on a Dynopack (Evans) and then on a Dynojet (not sure where).
PROPS to you for not sticking with bogus CF factors.
Yea we will run it in shoot44. We honestly don't care about the whole correction business anymore. Our numbers are right inline with ETS and the dynojet their car was on. Whether you guys believe a 1.2CF is too high, it matched ETS's build and we have the same freaking parts!!!
We will leave the car on a 1.0 or shoot44.
We will leave the car on a 1.0 or shoot44.
They were simply saying the cars were basically the same exact build and should yield almost identical numbers. No more, I am sick of getting emails about correction factors, lol.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand why we were using a correction factor for this build..I will leave it at that. Keep bashing the thread, It looks great.
everyones pushing th limit on these twin scroll 35r's why not takin a risk sinceyour already throwing money away and try a 40 or 42r on vp? i know ets offers the kit on lancershop .com and what not, but **** really ppl if your going to spend 15 to 20k why not really go all the way and do it right with the correctly upgraded components to maintain the power without igniting the whole dam car? make the calls get the correct upgrades and do it right thefirst time . . cutting corners can be costly so make sure you do it right the first time theres no rush to get to first place . . what ever happen to slow and steady wins the race lol mechanic wise . .