TeeJay's Quest For 700+whp Stock Block discussion thread
o and its not always about correction factor its on who can boost the quickest . . boost lag is a bi*** if you guys can make it happen quicker then youll be off the line faster and for most of you thathave tried buildin evos with low or no boost lag you know its a kick as* ride when your spiken that psi and your breaken neck so get rrrrr dooooonne the guys in miami support you guys alot so get it done right
everyones pushing th limit on these twin scroll 35r's why not takin a risk sinceyour already throwing money away and try a 40 or 42r on vp? i know ets offers the kit on lancershop .com and what not, but **** really ppl if your going to spend 15 to 20k why not really go all the way and do it right with the correctly upgraded components to maintain the power without igniting the whole dam car? make the calls get the correct upgrades and do it right thefirst time . . cutting corners can be costly so make sure you do it right the first time theres no rush to get to first place . . what ever happen to slow and steady wins the race lol mechanic wise . .
I'm still trying to clarify here... so you guys are running a 1.2 CF? I'm at 4500 ft and we don't even use correction factors that high when we are experiencing 7000+ ft DA days. Up here, even 1.10-1.13 seems most accurate to normalize to sea level #'s.
And we all know through the endless debate of DynoJet vs. MD that the difference between the dyno output numbers isn't necessarily a percentage difference, and can be a combination of a constant difference + a ratio. Much like drivetrain loss not necessarily being a solid percentage.
Not bashing, just truly trying to understand how you think a CF of 1.20 is kosher at sea level.
Anyway, good luck as I've said before. I'm really interested to see how the essentially stock bottom end holds up. People will bring up the tight ring end gaps, but that's not an issue if you keep combustion temperatures down... so hopefully you won't see any busted top ring lands!
And we all know through the endless debate of DynoJet vs. MD that the difference between the dyno output numbers isn't necessarily a percentage difference, and can be a combination of a constant difference + a ratio. Much like drivetrain loss not necessarily being a solid percentage.
Not bashing, just truly trying to understand how you think a CF of 1.20 is kosher at sea level.
Anyway, good luck as I've said before. I'm really interested to see how the essentially stock bottom end holds up. People will bring up the tight ring end gaps, but that's not an issue if you keep combustion temperatures down... so hopefully you won't see any busted top ring lands!
Guys just forget it, they said they were going to run in 1.0CF and shoot44 only, so just drop it.
They were simply saying the cars were basically the same exact build and should yield almost identical numbers. No more, I am sick of getting emails about correction factors, lol.
They were simply saying the cars were basically the same exact build and should yield almost identical numbers. No more, I am sick of getting emails about correction factors, lol.
You and me both...
!WORD!
everyones pushing th limit on these twin scroll 35r's why not takin a risk sinceyour already throwing money away and try a 40 or 42r on vp? i know ets offers the kit on lancershop .com and what not, but **** really ppl if your going to spend 15 to 20k why not really go all the way and do it right with the correctly upgraded components to maintain the power without igniting the whole dam car? make the calls get the correct upgrades and do it right thefirst time . . cutting corners can be costly so make sure you do it right the first time theres no rush to get to first place . . what ever happen to slow and steady wins the race lol mechanic wise . .
With the parts that i used, i feel NO Corners were cut. I specificly told DG, i didn't want to cut any corners and if they needed something, just order it or tell me and i'll order it. i had plans to get some other items was was told that they were NOT needed, so i didn't bother.
Who has ran a HTA86 twin scroll?
Any results? Interested to see how it performs, as the HTA35 seems to work great as a twin scroll turbo, as does the FPRED, and 40R, and 42R.
Scorke
FYI, this isnt a TwinScroll. HTA3586R is meant to be ran as a single scroll kit. I didn't want the turbo to take forever to hit, i'm quite happy with my choice and the choice Michael @ ETS helped me decide. It is what it is, and we may go 40 or 42r with the *new* motor. 700hp is 700hp, just because the larger turbo can produce more HP doesn't mean the engine can. Did you forget we are werkin with a STOCK block?
When trying to get the most power possible with the HTA3586 T3 open scroll is the way to do it on the T3 exhaust housing. If you are looking for a little faster spool, but don't want to max the turbo you can run a twin scroll T3 HTA3586, but the a/r is kind of small... it's only available in a .78 a/r (It's not a bad way to go, but the open scroll w/ .82 will make more power up top.) We recently sold a couple kits with a T4 .96 and 1.06 a/r so we should have some results up shortly.
Thanks,
Michael
Thanks,
Michael
New Map Sensor, Road Test, And Video!
Ok boys we think the issue is fixed! We popped the new 4 bar map sensor in, re-scaled and quickly tuned the mapping at 31psi. Still on VP Import fuel and the car is plain nasty at this power level. The car made over 600hp and sure as hell feels like it on a quick little road test we did.
We do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno Tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on VP Import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...
Here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully I don't get in trouble for it, I only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and Import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.
When the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J766x11b6LM
We do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno Tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on VP Import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...
Here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully I don't get in trouble for it, I only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and Import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.
When the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J766x11b6LM
Ok boys we think the issue is fixed! We popped the new 4 bar map sensor in, re-scaled and quickly tuned the mapping at 31psi. Still on VP Import fuel and the car is plain nasty at this power level. The car made over 600hp and sure as hell feels like it on a quick little road test we did.
We do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno Tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on VP Import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...
Here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully I don't get in trouble for it, I only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and Import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.
When the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J766x11b6LM
We do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno Tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on VP Import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...
Here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully I don't get in trouble for it, I only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and Import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.
When the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J766x11b6LM

I can't wait tell tomorrow!Thanks,
Michael
ok boys we think the issue is fixed! We popped the new 4 bar map sensor in, re-scaled and quickly tuned the mapping at 31psi. Still on vp import fuel and the car is plain nasty at this power level. The car made over 600hp and sure as hell feels like it on a quick little road test we did.
we do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on vp import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...
here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully i don't get in trouble for it, i only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.
when the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.
video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j766x11b6lm
we do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on vp import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...
here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully i don't get in trouble for it, i only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.
when the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.
video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j766x11b6lm
When trying to get the most power possible with the HTA3586 T3 open scroll is the way to do it on the T3 exhaust housing. If you are looking for a little faster spool, but don't want to max the turbo you can run a twin scroll T3 HTA3586, but the a/r is kind of small... it's only available in a .78 a/r (It's not a bad way to go, but the open scroll w/ .82 will make more power up top.) We recently sold a couple kits with a T4 .96 and 1.06 a/r so we should have some results up shortly.
Thanks,
Michael
Thanks,
Michael
Your saying a t3 open scroll housing will make more top end power than a T4 open scroll or T4 divided?
I just cannot wrap my mind around that...
Scorke







