Notices
Northeast Region Includes CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT.

TeeJay's Quest For 700+whp Stock Block discussion thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #406  
REVOlution86's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: MIAMI
o and its not always about correction factor its on who can boost the quickest . . boost lag is a bi*** if you guys can make it happen quicker then youll be off the line faster and for most of you thathave tried buildin evos with low or no boost lag you know its a kick as* ride when your spiken that psi and your breaken neck so get rrrrr dooooonne the guys in miami support you guys alot so get it done right
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #407  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
Originally Posted by REVOlution86
everyones pushing th limit on these twin scroll 35r's why not takin a risk sinceyour already throwing money away and try a 40 or 42r on vp? i know ets offers the kit on lancershop .com and what not, but **** really ppl if your going to spend 15 to 20k why not really go all the way and do it right with the correctly upgraded components to maintain the power without igniting the whole dam car? make the calls get the correct upgrades and do it right thefirst time . . cutting corners can be costly so make sure you do it right the first time theres no rush to get to first place . . what ever happen to slow and steady wins the race lol mechanic wise . .
That may be b/c they want the car to hit boost sooner. I went with the hta twin scroll 82 instead of the 86 just b/c I wanted it to not spool that late. I'm not out to break a record or anything though either.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #408  
UT_EvoX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: SL, UT
I'm still trying to clarify here... so you guys are running a 1.2 CF? I'm at 4500 ft and we don't even use correction factors that high when we are experiencing 7000+ ft DA days. Up here, even 1.10-1.13 seems most accurate to normalize to sea level #'s.

And we all know through the endless debate of DynoJet vs. MD that the difference between the dyno output numbers isn't necessarily a percentage difference, and can be a combination of a constant difference + a ratio. Much like drivetrain loss not necessarily being a solid percentage.

Not bashing, just truly trying to understand how you think a CF of 1.20 is kosher at sea level.

Anyway, good luck as I've said before. I'm really interested to see how the essentially stock bottom end holds up. People will bring up the tight ring end gaps, but that's not an issue if you keep combustion temperatures down... so hopefully you won't see any busted top ring lands!
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 04:40 PM
  #409  
projekX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: New Joisey
Originally Posted by norcalSRTrida
And have you actually taken your or a customers car to ETS' dyno and did back to back comparison, or are you simply comparing over some 'similar' dyno #'s posted on the internet?
We are comparing numbers of exactly the same builds, the only difference is that we are running aftermarket cams and they ran stock cams, so if anything, ar numbers should be slightly higher...

Originally Posted by murlo26
Guys just forget it, they said they were going to run in 1.0CF and shoot44 only, so just drop it.

They were simply saying the cars were basically the same exact build and should yield almost identical numbers. No more, I am sick of getting emails about correction factors, lol.
It's like telling an 8 yr old, "NO", that just keep doin it and doin it.

You and me both...

Originally Posted by DG Motors
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand why we were using a correction factor for this build..I will leave it at that. Keep bashing the thread, It looks great.

!WORD!

Originally Posted by REVOlution86
everyones pushing th limit on these twin scroll 35r's why not takin a risk sinceyour already throwing money away and try a 40 or 42r on vp? i know ets offers the kit on lancershop .com and what not, but **** really ppl if your going to spend 15 to 20k why not really go all the way and do it right with the correctly upgraded components to maintain the power without igniting the whole dam car? make the calls get the correct upgrades and do it right thefirst time . . cutting corners can be costly so make sure you do it right the first time theres no rush to get to first place . . what ever happen to slow and steady wins the race lol mechanic wise . .
FYI, this isnt a TwinScroll. HTA3586R is meant to be ran as a single scroll kit. I didn't want the turbo to take forever to hit, i'm quite happy with my choice and the choice Michael @ ETS helped me decide. It is what it is, and we may go 40 or 42r with the *new* motor. 700hp is 700hp, just because the larger turbo can produce more HP doesn't mean the engine can. Did you forget we are werkin with a STOCK block?

With the parts that i used, i feel NO Corners were cut. I specificly told DG, i didn't want to cut any corners and if they needed something, just order it or tell me and i'll order it. i had plans to get some other items was was told that they were NOT needed, so i didn't bother.

Originally Posted by Excalibur
That may be b/c they want the car to hit boost sooner. I went with the hta twin scroll 82 instead of the 86 just b/c I wanted it to not spool that late. I'm not out to break a record or anything though either.
Exactly, ETS actually started on the 82 and then went to the 86. I asked about using the 86 as a twin scroll and Michael told me, "Sure it works, but she'll fall flat on her face up top!" and i sure didn't want this...
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #410  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by projekX

Exactly, ETS actually started on the 82 and then went to the 86. I asked about using the 86 as a twin scroll and Michael told me, "Sure it works, but she'll fall flat on her face up top!" and i sure didn't want this...

Who has ran a HTA86 twin scroll?

Any results? Interested to see how it performs, as the HTA35 seems to work great as a twin scroll turbo, as does the FPRED, and 40R, and 42R.

Scorke
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #411  
UT_EvoX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: SL, UT
Originally Posted by projekX
FYI, this isnt a TwinScroll. HTA3586R is meant to be ran as a single scroll kit. I didn't want the turbo to take forever to hit, i'm quite happy with my choice and the choice Michael @ ETS helped me decide. It is what it is, and we may go 40 or 42r with the *new* motor. 700hp is 700hp, just because the larger turbo can produce more HP doesn't mean the engine can. Did you forget we are werkin with a STOCK block?
And to add, the HTA86 is 800 WHP capable, so I think they did a fine job choosing that turbo.
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:21 AM
  #412  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
When trying to get the most power possible with the HTA3586 T3 open scroll is the way to do it on the T3 exhaust housing. If you are looking for a little faster spool, but don't want to max the turbo you can run a twin scroll T3 HTA3586, but the a/r is kind of small... it's only available in a .78 a/r (It's not a bad way to go, but the open scroll w/ .82 will make more power up top.) We recently sold a couple kits with a T4 .96 and 1.06 a/r so we should have some results up shortly.

Thanks,

Michael
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 02:18 PM
  #413  
DG Motors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
From: long island
New Map Sensor, Road Test, And Video!

Ok boys we think the issue is fixed! We popped the new 4 bar map sensor in, re-scaled and quickly tuned the mapping at 31psi. Still on VP Import fuel and the car is plain nasty at this power level. The car made over 600hp and sure as hell feels like it on a quick little road test we did.

We do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno Tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on VP Import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...

Here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully I don't get in trouble for it, I only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and Import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.


When the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.

VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J766x11b6LM
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #414  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by DG Motors
Ok boys we think the issue is fixed! We popped the new 4 bar map sensor in, re-scaled and quickly tuned the mapping at 31psi. Still on VP Import fuel and the car is plain nasty at this power level. The car made over 600hp and sure as hell feels like it on a quick little road test we did.

We do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno Tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on VP Import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...

Here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully I don't get in trouble for it, I only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and Import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.


When the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.

VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J766x11b6LM
I can't wait tell tomorrow!

Thanks,

Michael
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #415  
Evo a Mula's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
From: bayshore ny
TJ I seen that car & almost took it home but sadly I couldn't catch it...this thing revs to 8500k like a beast


Fast shifting is needed lool
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #416  
monkey_187's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
From: Unknown
That thing sounds great! I cant wait to see the results of tomorrows tune!
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #417  
Farred's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
sweet car tj. skype?
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #418  
boost_me's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: BKLYN, NY
Originally Posted by dg motors
ok boys we think the issue is fixed! We popped the new 4 bar map sensor in, re-scaled and quickly tuned the mapping at 31psi. Still on vp import fuel and the car is plain nasty at this power level. The car made over 600hp and sure as hell feels like it on a quick little road test we did.

we do not know for sure that the issue is fixed until we strap the car back down on the dyno tomorrow for the final tuning. The goal is still 700hp which will most likely take 37-40psi on vp import on a stock ecu and stock bottom end...

here is a quick little video of some in-car action and 9,000 rpm on some industrial roads near our facility. Hopefully i don't get in trouble for it, i only made it so the community can see how nasty and powerful this car is at 30+psi and import fuel since there is not much footage of any evo x in action at this power level.


when the car is done with the tuning here, we will be bringing it to our local dynojet.

video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j766x11b6lm
niiiice... (4)
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 06:11 PM
  #419  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
When trying to get the most power possible with the HTA3586 T3 open scroll is the way to do it on the T3 exhaust housing. If you are looking for a little faster spool, but don't want to max the turbo you can run a twin scroll T3 HTA3586, but the a/r is kind of small... it's only available in a .78 a/r (It's not a bad way to go, but the open scroll w/ .82 will make more power up top.) We recently sold a couple kits with a T4 .96 and 1.06 a/r so we should have some results up shortly.

Thanks,

Michael
?!?!?

Your saying a t3 open scroll housing will make more top end power than a T4 open scroll or T4 divided?

I just cannot wrap my mind around that...

Scorke
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #420  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by scorke
?!?!?

Your saying a t3 open scroll housing will make more top end power than a T4 open scroll or T4 divided?

I just cannot wrap my mind around that...

Scorke
Scorke, he said if you are trying to make the MOST ON A T3, then use an open scroll.




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 PM.