TeeJay's Quest For 700+whp Stock Block discussion thread
On that dyno a Stock X makes 264whp?
My car made 234whp stock on AMS' dynojet, which would be a 1.070 Correction Factor in comparison to the 219.7whp you posted that "Andre's" stock X made.
(Not trying to turn this into a dyno debate, but a 1.2 Correction Factor is pretty serious.)
My car made 234whp stock on AMS' dynojet, which would be a 1.070 Correction Factor in comparison to the 219.7whp you posted that "Andre's" stock X made.
(Not trying to turn this into a dyno debate, but a 1.2 Correction Factor is pretty serious.)
On that dyno a Stock X makes 264whp?
My car made 234whp stock on AMS' dynojet, which would be a 1.070 Correction Factor in comparison to the 219.7whp you posted that "Andre's" stock X made.
(Not trying to turn this into a dyno debate, but a 1.2 Correction Factor is pretty serious.)
My car made 234whp stock on AMS' dynojet, which would be a 1.070 Correction Factor in comparison to the 219.7whp you posted that "Andre's" stock X made.
(Not trying to turn this into a dyno debate, but a 1.2 Correction Factor is pretty serious.)
+ DG MOTORS build & tune + ETS Turbo kit= 
It is 65 degrees in my dyno bay right now..It is no where near 40 outside the shop.
Mike
Well it was 104 in hours today.. Why dont you just clear things up when you break all these records with 1.2 correction and just drive the car over the Ivey and make 1 pass on thier DYNOJET so you get an honest #?? Ill pay for the pulls.. How bout that??
Mike
Mike
If you need a 1.2 correction factor to match a dynojet, that local dynojet is broke at reads astronomically high.
I have 5 years experience using and tuning on a Dyno Dynamics. A stock X on a DD should make 215, and up to 225 on a couple of really strong stock examples I've seen.
Every dynojet I've compared that to is much closer to at a 1.12 correction factor for an AWD car, but it is _never_ static as the numbers rise, because they read horsepower completely differently.
Run it at 1.0. Who cares if the numbers "look" low, and let the car do the talking at a dragstrip. Lots of poeple on Evom have been exposed to this type of dyno and are aware of how it reads. Please don't cheapen the results by inflating the heck out of them!
I have 5 years experience using and tuning on a Dyno Dynamics. A stock X on a DD should make 215, and up to 225 on a couple of really strong stock examples I've seen.
Every dynojet I've compared that to is much closer to at a 1.12 correction factor for an AWD car, but it is _never_ static as the numbers rise, because they read horsepower completely differently.
Run it at 1.0. Who cares if the numbers "look" low, and let the car do the talking at a dragstrip. Lots of poeple on Evom have been exposed to this type of dyno and are aware of how it reads. Please don't cheapen the results by inflating the heck out of them!
Evolving Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Im in Reno trick.
he said he would dyno it on a local dynojet.... when all the numbers come out then we will see the real results of their build (dyno wise anyway), maybe a 1/4 time to back it up soon aswell?
Last edited by flyboytb; Oct 17, 2009 at 04:35 PM.
If you need a 1.2 correction factor to match a dynojet, that local dynojet is broke at reads astronomically high.
I have 5 years experience using and tuning on a Dyno Dynamics. A stock X on a DD should make 215, and up to 225 on a couple of really strong stock examples I've seen.
Every dynojet I've compared that to is much closer to at a 1.12 correction factor for an AWD car, but it is _never_ static as the numbers rise, because they read horsepower completely differently.
Run it at 1.0. Who cares if the numbers "look" low, and let the car do the talking at a dragstrip. Lots of poeple on Evom have been exposed to this type of dyno and are aware of how it reads. Please don't cheapen the results by inflating the heck out of them!
I have 5 years experience using and tuning on a Dyno Dynamics. A stock X on a DD should make 215, and up to 225 on a couple of really strong stock examples I've seen.
Every dynojet I've compared that to is much closer to at a 1.12 correction factor for an AWD car, but it is _never_ static as the numbers rise, because they read horsepower completely differently.
Run it at 1.0. Who cares if the numbers "look" low, and let the car do the talking at a dragstrip. Lots of poeple on Evom have been exposed to this type of dyno and are aware of how it reads. Please don't cheapen the results by inflating the heck out of them!
+1... but then they wouldnt be breaking all these HP records.. I wonder how Dave Buschur has made it thru the last few years as he hasn't broken ANY HP records with his cars.. Funny though that they are always breaking track records where the proof is REALLY in the pudding..
Mike
Last edited by AWD Motorsports; Oct 17, 2009 at 05:22 PM.