2.3L GT3076Build
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
I got the fuel map fixed back up during my drive home. I then added a few degrees of timing out the top, looking to find the MBT threshold where it stops making more torque/power. It's now making 500 whp by holding the torque better in the top end.
I'll keep adding a degree at a time up top until it stops making more power. Then I'll go in and try some timing adjustments around peak torque, and see if there's more to be had around there. That's where my false knock is active so you have to be a Sherlock Holmes to interpret the data.
After I shakeout the MBT timing I'll go and pull 2 degrees out and use that as the tune. E85 is fun stuff.
I'll keep adding a degree at a time up top until it stops making more power. Then I'll go in and try some timing adjustments around peak torque, and see if there's more to be had around there. That's where my false knock is active so you have to be a Sherlock Holmes to interpret the data.
After I shakeout the MBT timing I'll go and pull 2 degrees out and use that as the tune. E85 is fun stuff.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA

I have seen DLL's as high as 548 on 27psi.
Fathouse
What are you #'s?
I can 2nd to the top of 5th on this tune with zero knock. I love me some e85.

Fathouse
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
I need a few more days to get the timing tuned, then I'll post up some DLL graphs. Right now it's about 500 whp and 420 ft-lbs torque.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
Errrrrrr.
I want to throw rocks at my car!
Went out last night to work on timing... made the first baseline pull and went to review the DLL power graph. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs of torque. what the hell. At this point I'm wondering how reliable DLL is, since I was making well over 460 whp and 420 ft-lbs. So I make another pull, and I notice the car feels slow and seems to spool crappy. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs again. So now I'm pissed and call it a night.
I went back and reviewed the older data where the car was making 460-500 whp and compared it to the 430 whp 375 ft-lbs. I think DLL is right. It's not the logger - my car is being lame. I'm spooling slower and noticed my AFR's got richer.
So I've got either a boost leak in the IC piping, or my manifold is leaking before the turbo. Stupid car.....
I want to throw rocks at my car!
Went out last night to work on timing... made the first baseline pull and went to review the DLL power graph. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs of torque. what the hell. At this point I'm wondering how reliable DLL is, since I was making well over 460 whp and 420 ft-lbs. So I make another pull, and I notice the car feels slow and seems to spool crappy. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs again. So now I'm pissed and call it a night.
I went back and reviewed the older data where the car was making 460-500 whp and compared it to the 430 whp 375 ft-lbs. I think DLL is right. It's not the logger - my car is being lame. I'm spooling slower and noticed my AFR's got richer.
So I've got either a boost leak in the IC piping, or my manifold is leaking before the turbo. Stupid car.....
Errrrrrr.
I want to throw rocks at my car!
Went out last night to work on timing... made the first baseline pull and went to review the DLL power graph. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs of torque. what the hell. At this point I'm wondering how reliable DLL is, since I was making well over 460 whp and 420 ft-lbs. So I make another pull, and I notice the car feels slow and seems to spool crappy. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs again. So now I'm pissed and call it a night.
I went back and reviewed the older data where the car was making 460-500 whp and compared it to the 430 whp 375 ft-lbs. I think DLL is right. It's not the logger - my car is being lame. I'm spooling slower and noticed my AFR's got richer.
So I've got either a boost leak in the IC piping, or my manifold is leaking before the turbo. Stupid car.....
I want to throw rocks at my car!
Went out last night to work on timing... made the first baseline pull and went to review the DLL power graph. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs of torque. what the hell. At this point I'm wondering how reliable DLL is, since I was making well over 460 whp and 420 ft-lbs. So I make another pull, and I notice the car feels slow and seems to spool crappy. 430 whp and 375 ft-lbs again. So now I'm pissed and call it a night.
I went back and reviewed the older data where the car was making 460-500 whp and compared it to the 430 whp 375 ft-lbs. I think DLL is right. It's not the logger - my car is being lame. I'm spooling slower and noticed my AFR's got richer.
So I've got either a boost leak in the IC piping, or my manifold is leaking before the turbo. Stupid car.....
Welcome to the party. Cars are hateful!

Good luck to ya, keep us up on the results, and make some in car vids
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
Well I pulled the whole turbo setup out of the car last night. There was dust and exhaust residue all over the engine bay from the leaky manifold. It's been cracked since I got it for $200 (although there was no mention of it being cracked). I patched it up with my TIG welder, but some of the areas were not accessible and fixing some created cracks in other areas. I've been worried about it since I installed it.
As much as I'd like to build a new manifold myself I don't have time as spring is for house projects - according to my wife. And I've got track day in 2 weeks, so I need it running to finish tuning STAT.
So I had the manifold dropped off at ETS this morning. We will see if it's best to build a new custom manifold which places the turbo in the same location as the RNR did so that I can retain my custom O2 housing etc. Or just switch over to their standard equal length and run one of their O2 housings. ETS is super flexible and can do just about anything in terms of manifold setups. So it's really nice to have those guys a few hours away.
As much as I'd like to build a new manifold myself I don't have time as spring is for house projects - according to my wife. And I've got track day in 2 weeks, so I need it running to finish tuning STAT.
So I had the manifold dropped off at ETS this morning. We will see if it's best to build a new custom manifold which places the turbo in the same location as the RNR did so that I can retain my custom O2 housing etc. Or just switch over to their standard equal length and run one of their O2 housings. ETS is super flexible and can do just about anything in terms of manifold setups. So it's really nice to have those guys a few hours away.
Last edited by jid2; Apr 9, 2009 at 08:52 AM.
Well I pulled the whole turbo setup out of the car last night. There was dust and exhaust residue all over the engine bay from the leaky manifold. It's been cracked since I got it for $200 (although there was no mention of it being cracked). I patched it up with my TIG welder, but some of the areas were not accessible and fixing some created cracks in other areas. I've been worried about it since I installed it.
As much as I'd like to build a new manifold myself I don't have time as spring is for house projects - according to my wife. And I've got track day in 2 weeks, so I need it running to finish tuning STAT.
So I had the manifold dropped off at ETS this morning. We will see if it's best to build a new custom manifold which places the turbo in the same location as the RNR did so that I can retain my custom O2 housing etc. Or just switch over to their standard equal length and run one of their O2 housings. ETS is super flexible and can do just about anything in terms of manifold setups. So it's really nice to have those guys a few hours away.
As much as I'd like to build a new manifold myself I don't have time as spring is for house projects - according to my wife. And I've got track day in 2 weeks, so I need it running to finish tuning STAT.
So I had the manifold dropped off at ETS this morning. We will see if it's best to build a new custom manifold which places the turbo in the same location as the RNR did so that I can retain my custom O2 housing etc. Or just switch over to their standard equal length and run one of their O2 housings. ETS is super flexible and can do just about anything in terms of manifold setups. So it's really nice to have those guys a few hours away.
YAY!

funny you say this now cause ive just started buying materials to build (attempt) to build my own manifold. im probably going to redo the 02 housing also
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
If it was winter I'd attempt. But I don't have time for me to screw up, and I'm afraid I would build something that would crack because the first time I would probably struggle with using the correct amount of heat.
I ended up just getting an off the shelf ETS equal length and one of their O2 housings with a V Band to modify my downpipe. It was the same cost as building a custom one jigged to match the RNR and this way I'll get the turbo in a better location as the RNR was too close to the block, too close to the AC and too far down...
I ended up just getting an off the shelf ETS equal length and one of their O2 housings with a V Band to modify my downpipe. It was the same cost as building a custom one jigged to match the RNR and this way I'll get the turbo in a better location as the RNR was too close to the block, too close to the AC and too far down...






