Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

I am always be your partner on that

there is amusing when someone find a 1/3 done crash test ( no front , back , roll etc test, just side) which is actually not horrible.
But claiming yes I have the horrible crash test results. 4 and 2 star, that is not horrible.
Its a not good or if you wish bad rate for a only one side 2 star, but the other side is 4...
In short you cant call call 2-4 star rating horrible when the top is 5. You cant even call it poor , since that is a one star rating. Also its a fact...

The new lancers are actually quiet good.

So stay ignorant my friend and we will have a good time.

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

Stop deflecting, just be quiet and quit while you aren't too deep in the hole.

2 star not bad? That is a poor rating by IIHS.

ambystom01

iTrader: (7)

I don't know if this is due to the language barrier, or you're just intentionally being thick. Let's recap:

You claimed the Evo hadn't been tested, ever. That was wrong.

You claimed the Evo did just fine. That was wrong. 2/5 is not a good result.

You don't seem to know what the word ignorant means, and now you're talking about the new Lancer, which is completely irrelevant.

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

no 1 star is poor, 2 star is better so its not horrible. 4 start def. not.
In fact you love math , 2+4 =6 overal 6:2 = 3

so number 3 overal is I think called acceptable. anyhow its not horrible as you guys claiming .

5 Stars = 5 percent or less chance for injury
•4 Stars = 6-10 percent chance for injury
•3 Stars = 11-20 percent chance for injury
•2 Stars = 21-25 percent chance for injury
•1 Star = 26 percent or greater chance for injury

ambystom01

iTrader: (7)

Keep digging that hole, Rob.

You go tell people that a car has a 21-25 percent chance of injury and see what they say.

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

Heaven forbid we use the word exponential.

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

exactly its not a good now you sounds rational once, but still its not horrible. Fail. even better the 1 star lol the other is waaay over Fail


I was wrong I didn't know they did a half *** test , which doesn't including major test like front , back roll over etc. that is true. I am not even sure why anyone would do a half *** test. I cant comment on this but I give my self a fail here make you happy.

also please again show me where I claimed the evo do itjust fine. I never said that. l Fail.

You see the trend here?

ambystom01

iTrader: (7)

Are you seriously trying to argue semantics here? 2/5 is a fail. It is the second lowest grade possible.

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

mine has more a lot more

also there is plenty of muscle car owners out there (new ones) with even worst rating then that. lol

so with that old Evo 2 star one side and 4start on the other I can actually pimpin' in car meets

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

Yes, yes you do:

"IIHS findings show a driver in a vehicle with a "Good" score is 70% less likely to die in a left-side crash than a driver in a vehicle rated "Poor".

Can you extrapolate what a 2 star rating survival percentage would be?

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

there is no IIHS test for evo as I know of , and the ratings also different.

and we not debating that. I am asking where he saw horrible crash test for the evo. and he came back with
one side 2 star from 5 and the other side 4 star. no more test been done. which is beyond weird.. lol

anyway we have that , and that results you guys like it or not, its not horrible by any means. Bad for sure the 2 star the 4 is actually quiet good.

So I leave it that. You guys can make this going one for yourself, if you like

I said what I have to

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

Jesus you're an idiot.

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

that really sounded very well educated

ambystom01

iTrader: (7)

Do you chug a bottle of vodka before posting or something?

You initially claimed the Evo was never tested in the US. That was downright false.

When presented with the actual test, you claimed that 2/5 isn't horrible, despite it meaning you are 5 times more likely to be injured than a 5/5 rating. It means 1/5-1/4 people are injured in a driver's side impact. That's horrible.

Now you're trying to argue semantics, namely whether it's "horrible" or "not good" which is amusing given that you struggle with English at times. Like a child, you're saying that you'll keep arguing unless we quit.

Grow the **** up, Rob. You're embarrassing the rally community. You were wrong. That's fine, it happens.

Robevo RS

iTrader: (16)

talk to razer about that one of your romantic night

http://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle+Shop...ESTA&year=2015