Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Focus RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 08:08 AM
  #2176  
IzzyRS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 818
Likes: 22
From: Us
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
The issue of water pooling likely comes only from people who never push the car. Even on the Ecoboost F150's that had the problem, not everyone had the issues. I would venture to say that people who never towed or gave the truck some throttle are the ones that were more likely to have the issue. I can't see water building up to a significant amount if someone lets the car stretch its legs every now and then.
This makes sense, but I wonder why they had this issue in the RS. I figured these cars would be pushed quite a bit in testing, maybe the issue was during the testing phase that didn't require lots of WOT
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 08:19 AM
  #2177  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by IzzyRS
This makes sense, but I wonder why they had this issue in the RS. I figured these cars would be pushed quite a bit in testing, maybe the issue was during the testing phase that didn't require lots of WOT
Like any other vehicle, performance driving is only one of the battery of tests an OEM puts the new car through. There are likely 10-20 FoRS's with over 100k miles on them sitting in a warehouse somewhere, partially torn apart by engineers for component inspection.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 08:29 AM
  #2178  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
physics are the same, perhaps designs are not.

The question still stands, what can be that much different, if you don't even use the OEM IC ( in fact the OEM IC is actually really efficient on the Evo, and can support bigger turbos too efficiently).
Does Your EcoBoost Shudder? Here’s the Problem
http://blog.bluespringsfordparts.com...boost-shudder/

Problem seems to have been around a while, and is not the result of "our intercooler being too efficient"
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 08:32 AM
  #2179  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Different car, dude. There's also this line:

What does this have to do with humid areas? Those drivers live in an area where the dew point is equal to the ambient temperature for much of the time. This means condensation occurs more often causing more issues.
So if the charge is cooled to ambient temperature, a sign of a good intercooler, the problem appears. That's my take as a person that did indeed take physics in university.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 08:36 AM
  #2180  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Yes, but its clear that ecoboost engines have been having this problem on models with "less efficient" intercoolers than what is found on the RS.

For instance, its also an issue on the Focus ST http://www.focusst.org/forum/focus-s...densation.html

I basically live in a rain forest and have never had a "condensation" issue with ether my stock intercooler or an ETS 3.5" on an evo.

Looks like some Ford trucks have been having this issue since before 2012. Ford released TSB 12-10-19, but some owners report it not fixing the issue http://www.f150forum.com/f70/trucks-...-issue-182785/

Seems like Ford knew, or should have known, this was an issue. But I guess you can believe that the "block off plate" is there because the intercooler is SUPER efficient.

Wonder why this is not an issue on Garrett intercoolers, I guess they are not efficient enough.

Last edited by nemsin; Jan 22, 2016 at 08:56 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 08:58 AM
  #2181  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Did you bother to read your own link?

I'm running the large steeda/cpe intercooler.
The car you reference isn't stock.

Further down:

Worth taking a look at I'm running an open air filter from steeda at this time. The filter was dry last time I checked.
Nothing in that link suggests it's a problem on the ST.

Perhaps you haven't had a problem because your intercooler isn't as efficient.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 09:03 AM
  #2182  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Perhaps you haven't had a problem because your intercooler isn't as efficient.
So your reasoning is Ford OEM intercoolers must be more efficient than Mishimoto and Garrett?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 09:07 AM
  #2183  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by nemsin
So your reasoning is Ford OEM intercoolers must be more efficient than Mishimoto and Garrett?
That's what the Ford engineers have attributed the problem to; an overly efficient intercooler. Given that they didn't change the design but just installed some plates to block air, it appears to be a legitimate explanation. If the problem was the design itself, you'd think they'd change the design itself.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 09:11 AM
  #2184  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Except Ford also tried the block off plate "fix" on the F150 and people report it still being a problem.

1. Check for DTC P0430. Is DTC P0430 present?
a. Yes - Replace the left bank catalytic converter assembly. Refer to Workshop Manual (WSM), Section 309-00. Proceed to Step 2.
b. No - Proceed to Step 2.
2. Is the Charge Air Cooler (CAC) equipped with an air deflector plate?
a. Yes - Proceed to Step 5.
b. No - Proceed to Step 3.
3. Install a new CAC, new air deflector plate, and original shield using new retaining pushpins. Refer to WSM, Section 303-12. Proceed to Step 4.
4. Reprogram the PCM to the latest calibration using IDS release 79.02A or higher. This new calibration is not included in the 2012.5 DVD. Calibration files may also be obtained at www.motorcraft.com.
5. Install a new CAC and the original air deflector plate and shield using new retaining pushpins. Refer WSM, Section 303-12.

http://www.f150forum.com/f70/trucks-...-issue-182785/
ERVICE PROCEDURE
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 09:18 AM
  #2185  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by nemsin
Except Ford also tried the block off plate "fix" on the F150 and people report it still being a problem.

1. Check for DTC P0430. Is DTC P0430 present?
a. Yes - Replace the left bank catalytic converter assembly. Refer to Workshop Manual (WSM), Section 309-00. Proceed to Step 2.
b. No - Proceed to Step 2.
2. Is the Charge Air Cooler (CAC) equipped with an air deflector plate?
a. Yes - Proceed to Step 5.
b. No - Proceed to Step 3.
3. Install a new CAC, new air deflector plate, and original shield using new retaining pushpins. Refer to WSM, Section 303-12. Proceed to Step 4.
4. Reprogram the PCM to the latest calibration using IDS release 79.02A or higher. This new calibration is not included in the 2012.5 DVD. Calibration files may also be obtained at www.motorcraft.com.
5. Install a new CAC and the original air deflector plate and shield using new retaining pushpins. Refer WSM, Section 303-12.

http://www.f150forum.com/f70/trucks-...-issue-182785/
ERVICE PROCEDURE
Cool bro, that's a different car, or rather a different vehicle. Ford seems fairly confident that the plate has fixed the issue on the Focus.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 09:28 AM
  #2186  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Cool bro, that's a different car, or rather a different vehicle. Ford seems fairly confident that the plate has fixed the issue on the Focus.
Yea, the f150 has a 15" tall CAC and the inlet and outlet are all the way at the top. Like an ETS Evo intercooler, but flipped upside down and taller.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 10:20 AM
  #2187  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
I just about fell out of my chair laughing as I read this because, "this never happens on Evo's." #ded


https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...take-rain.html
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 10:28 AM
  #2188  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
****ing hell this just gets more and more ridiculous.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 10:35 AM
  #2189  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
i'm so lost right now...
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 10:38 AM
  #2190  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by kaj
i'm so lost right now...
To recap.
Why does the Focus RS fmic require a "block off plate" and will condensation in the intercooler be an issue?
If yes, is there something about the ecoboost engine, or the intercooler design which causes more than normal condensation to form inside the intercooler.

Ford claims its because their fmic is just so damn efficient they had to tone it back. I am not so sure.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 AM.