Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Focus RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 02:28 PM
  #2131  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
The F150 ecoboost had that issue in 2011-2012. Intercooler would partially fill with water in humid climates and ruin performance of the vehicle.

So, when you turn the boost up and the turbo makes more heat, you remove that plate and you have an "upgraded" intercooler already on the car...nice lol
so why this is doesn't happen for an example with 4 inch IC on stock turbos for an example in the Evo? Or just I don't know about it?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 02:36 PM
  #2132  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Why isn't an unusual problem happening on a completely different car? I think the answer to that is pretty obvious.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 02:50 PM
  #2133  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
so why this is doesn't happen for an example with 4 inch IC on stock turbos for an example in the Evo? Or just I don't know about it?
It's a completely different car? With completely different....everything....?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:04 PM
  #2134  
WarmMilk's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
so why this is doesn't happen for an example with 4 inch IC on stock turbos for an example in the Evo? Or just I don't know about it?
yeah, thats exactly what I'm thinking... I mean where inside the intercooler does the water even get a chance to pool up enough from condensation? wouldn't it just get blown into the engine as you drive? its not like its a big laggy turbo that you can drive anywhere without going into boost... it sounds to me like its a horrible intercooler design from an internal flow standpoint that water even has a chance to pool up anywhere. the blanking plate is a cheap last minute "we don't have time (and/or money) to redesign the intercooler" bandaide fix and has no place on a 35+k car
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:06 PM
  #2135  
WarmMilk's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Why isn't an unusual problem happening on a completely different car? I think the answer to that is pretty obvious.
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
It's a completely different car? With completely different....everything....?
I'm gonna side with Rob on this. the basics of turbo's and intercoolers is the same. Like I said in my post above, its more of a poor internal flow design issue rather than the "our intercooler is too efficient" bs line
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:36 PM
  #2136  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
The basics may be the same, but that's like saying anatomy from one person to the other is basically the same, so why do some people die when they eat a peanut?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:41 PM
  #2137  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Why isn't an unusual problem happening on a completely different car? I think the answer to that is pretty obvious.
physics are the same, perhaps designs are not.

The question still stands, what can be that much different, if you don't even use the OEM IC ( in fact the OEM IC is actually really efficient on the Evo, and can support bigger turbos too efficiently).

The 4 inch even the 3.5 inch is SO much larger then the factory turbo needs ( hence the theoretically much much better cooling) Why this isn't an issue on the EVo or the STI etc?

What can be a problem? Or it does exits in the Evo /STI? other cars like GTI etc
Or I just never heard of it.

Most I heard is the oil residue after long period of time , but that is another deal.

Real legit question, and I would dlike to know. "I told you so " from experts as Amby wont cut it . I need some educated info. I am interested.
Just a bigger size alone can do that? why isn't (if inst do it) in other Turbo cars is not an issue.

How much water it makes , since some small amount of water turbo engine easily get rid of.

Last edited by Robevo RS; Jan 21, 2016 at 03:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:46 PM
  #2138  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by ambystom01
The basics may be the same, but that's like saying anatomy from one person to the other is basically the same, so why do some people die when they eat a peanut?
what do you think about medicines ? LOL

"Defective" bodys who cant tolerate example peanuts are not the standard neither the desired case you want to have or follow. ( I don't want to sound mean or Politically incorrect so sorry if sounds that way)
But with a same treatment or medicine, problem can be solved, if we know what is causing the problem.

Metal plate sounds more like a temporary solution for me, specially from the shelfs, then finding the roots of the problem, if that is a design problem.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:52 PM
  #2139  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
physics are the same, perhaps designs are not.

The question still stands, what can be that much different, if you don't even use the OEM IC ( in fact the OEM IC is actually really efficient on the Evo, and can support bigger turbos too efficiently).

The 4 inch even the 3.5 inch is SO much larger then the factory turbo needs ( hence the theoretically much much better cooling) Why this isn't an issue on the EVo or the STI etc?

What can be a problem? Or it does exits in the Evo /STI? other cars like GTI etc
Or I just never heard of it.

Most I heard is the oil residue after long period of time , but that is another deal.

Real legit question, and I would dlike to know. "I told you so " from experts as Amby wont cut it . I need some educated info. I am interested.
Just a bigger size alone can do that? why isn't (if inst do it) in other Turbo cars is not an issue.

How much water it makes , since some small amount of water turbo engine easily get rid of.
You're comparing apples to oranges. Yes, the physics is the same but last I checked, nobody here is an expert on the subject, and high school or undergrad physics really won't cut it if you're trying to explain something as complex as why water vapour build up occurs in one microenvironment but not the other. Are people suggesting there's some kind of conspiracy or something? It is what is, for some reason, the Ford intercooler design led to water vapour. The fact the Evo doesn't suffer this problem is irrelevant; different engine, different layout, different intercooler design, etc.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:53 PM
  #2140  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by warmmilk
yeah, thats exactly what I'm thinking... I mean where inside the intercooler does the water even get a chance to pool up enough from condensation? wouldn't it just get blown into the engine as you drive? its not like its a big laggy turbo that you can drive anywhere without going into boost... it sounds to me like its a horrible intercooler design from an internal flow standpoint that water even has a chance to pool up anywhere. the blanking plate is a cheap last minute "we don't have time (and/or money) to redesign the intercooler" bandaide fix and has no place on a 35+k car
well if its an IC design problem that is an easy fix

Montune have options so as Cosworth .

You got to love the necessary modifications . Easy to explain to your partner.

Honey we NEED this
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:57 PM
  #2141  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by ambystom01
You're comparing apples to oranges. Yes, the physics is the same but last I checked, nobody here is an expert on the subject, and high school or undergrad physics really won't cut it if you're trying to explain something as complex as why water vapour build up occurs in one microenvironment but not the other. Are people suggesting there's some kind of conspiracy or something? It is what is, for some reason, the Ford intercooler design led to water vapour. The fact the Evo doesn't suffer this problem is irrelevant; different engine, different layout, different intercooler design, etc.
that is cool, but its not EVo vs RS thing . Not even STI vs RS or older RS vs new RS etc...

Its about 2016 RS thing. I love the car and I want to know as much as I can. Maybe our sharp friend Razor will put some opinion into this. I would listen to that one. ( no offense)
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 03:59 PM
  #2142  
WarmMilk's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by ambystom01
You're comparing apples to oranges. Yes, the physics is the same but last I checked, nobody here is an expert on the subject, and high school or undergrad physics really won't cut it if you're trying to explain something as complex as why water vapour build up occurs in one microenvironment but not the other. Are people suggesting there's some kind of conspiracy or something? It is what is, for some reason, the Ford intercooler design led to water vapour. The fact the Evo doesn't suffer this problem is irrelevant; different engine, different layout, different intercooler design, etc.
the existence of water vapor / condensation isn't the problem, the problem is that the water has a chance too pool up somewhere in the system instead of blown into the engine as condensation occurs and water appears. the internal flow of the intercooler system (turbo outlet to throttle body) should be so that when condensation does occur, the water doesn't get a chance to pool up in such a quantity that it will cause an issue if it all goes into the engine at once.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 04:04 PM
  #2143  
WarmMilk's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
well if its an IC design problem that is an easy fix

Montune have options so as Cosworth .

You got to love the necessary modifications . Easy to explain to your partner.

Honey we NEED this
it might not be as easy to fix as just a new intercooler. if its an issue of where the outlet on the intercooler is it may require re-routing the IC piping... and underhood space isn't exactly a luxury in modern cars. it sounds like it could be a pricey fix...

I'm just hoping that panel thing is easy to remove. that way if you do stay stock, you can pull the panel out when you're at the track and on full throttle all the time, and then put it back in on the street where there's lots of part throttle driving...

ps.
my theory is it pools up somewhere during regular driving, and then when you go full throttle, all that water gets pushed into the engine all at once and causes and issue. thats the only plausible explanation I was able to think of. cause minimal amounts of water in the intake charge isn't an issue.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 04:10 PM
  #2144  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
that is cool, but its not EVo vs RS thing . Not even STI vs RS or older RS vs new RS etc...

Its about 2016 RS thing. I love the car and I want to know as much as I can. Maybe our sharp friend Razor will put some opinion into this. I would listen to that one. ( no offense)
Yet people have again invoked the Evo, including you:

so why this is doesn't happen for an example with 4 inch IC on stock turbos for an example in the Evo? Or just I don't know about it?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2016 | 04:11 PM
  #2145  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
we can talk about apples and oranges, but in my opinion this is not that case.
We talking about an internal combustion engine with a turbo charger and intercooler, even using a same fossil grade fuel. Nothing new here and a same principals and basic designs - physics - Bernoulli principals etc etc applies here.

There are things should and things shouldn't happen here. Its simple is that.

So if that much water collects in the system actually hurts ( Ford statement) the engine performance, and actually makes it run dangerous, something is not right.
They might need a new IC or other design here. Its sad since the car not even on the market yet, never mind even get modified yet.

Or maybe it happens all the time but with other cars doesn't cause any problem.
For me when you see temporary "power boost" its always a warning sign.
In my mind the car is not ready for that power, other wise they wouldn't make it limited period of time only. (based on my racing experience, which really can be apples and oranges )

press on guys
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:16 AM.