I know that this is a dumb question, but I have my doubts, so here goes: Is the 20G-LT/EvoGreen actually consistently producing better torque numbers on pumpgas than the other stock and stock-based turbos such as TME, 20G-9-5, White Rabbit and etc.? I just have some doubts, as I've seen some dyno numbers where a stock turbo produced pretty impressive torque numbers while I've seen some cases where the Green produces what I thought were relatively low torque #'s.

 

The bigger turbos tend to produce lower peak torque numbers on pump gas, but if you look at the graphs, the EvoGreen holds torque longer and flater than the stock turbos.

 

how much boost? what kinda gas...?

 

O.K., thanks! The Green has a broader, flatter torque band than the stock 16G's do then. Since it spools slower than a stock 16G then I guess that lowend torque wouldn't be as good. I installed mine, I just haven't had a chance to drive the car yet.

 

whoops forgot about that, 24psi on 91

 

Damn how are you able to turn it up to 24psi? Mine was set at 22psi on 91.

 

I have my boost controller turned all the way down, we tried to get it to lower but it just wouldn't. It's pretty high I know but...

 

Some Cams would really wake your car up...

 

what kinda boost gauge are you using?

 

Here is my graph, I am actually really pleased with these numbers, the dyno that I did this on reads about 20% lower than other mustang dyno's.

 

Defi

 

Yea and I will def. do cams once I get the money, I think that these numbers are pretty good for having no cams, tuner said that on a dynojet I would be around 385 but comparing dyno's isn't ever really fair. What do you guys think?

 

what was your base line?

 

Those gauges can read a bit off...

 

We didn't do a baseline but a couple weeks ago I did a tune on a dynapack with the intake, fmic, mbc and that was 325.7whp with 310 ft/lb