Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

GT3071 dyno results

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #16  
gnulooks's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire, CA
So what will be the availability of this new kit? I saw it not too long ago and I thought it was the ATP kit, obviously I was wrong. Also, will it bolt onto the stock signature series downpipe?

What will be the cost for this new kit versus the custom stage 3 kit that costs so much to make? It looks like a lot less parts for an easier intall and more savings for us...
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #17  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
well see what number it makes on my car. im gonna be running the adapter, stock intercooler and the vishnu 3037r. with the 680cc and a new dp. well see what kind of power that makes... i have a feeling that i will need to buy that ams intercooler but its gonna be nice to see the limit of the stock piece.
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 09:24 PM
  #18  
LuxuryBroker's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Southern Cali !!!
how much would you credit the bj's intake to this success?
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 09:25 PM
  #19  
Whooopasss's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 1
more info on the adapter please..
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 09:31 PM
  #20  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
more info soon.. ill post as soon as i get the kit installed and tuned. and i have to ask why the hell

im gay!!!
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #21  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
dumb co workers

Last edited by Vishnu_Evo8; Mar 26, 2005 at 09:37 PM.
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 11:15 PM
  #22  
Smogrunner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 1
From: Inland Empire, CA
Subscribing... and hoping this isn't too good to be true.
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 11:26 PM
  #23  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Az3ar
David, I am lost.. What do you mean by a turbo adapter? A turbo adapter must be the exhaust turbine housing. Is your turbo adapter an exhaust housing that bolts on the stock manifold just like the ATP one but different design?? Or is it an adapter for the ATP kit? Last call we talked about my kit and I told you I will see what my next plan will be after my dyno day south. But now you guys have made so much power with your adapter and the 280 that I am thinking about buying them by Monday (before the dyno day). I was thinking about manifold with T3 flange and to change my turbine side to T3 and that will put me on the right track. It seems that the 3071 loved the 280 cams and I will get them by Monday from Andrew but I want to know what was difference.


Thanks guys,
gee. what've i been saying all along.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 12:31 AM
  #24  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
Originally Posted by alex_alex
gee. what've i been saying all along.

Alex keep this $hit on topic and stop acting like a baby. GEE....
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 12:43 AM
  #25  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
Originally Posted by alex_alex
gee. what've i been saying all along.



So many things are not explained yet so don’t act like a smart *** because you don’t know the difference between T3 and a T3/T4.

What we have in the real world is T3 and T3/T4 flange for our EVOs and we have the ATP cast. Other than that I have not seen anything on the market yet. Now what makes me think is why would a flange be used on a T3 turbine? (If that's what Shiv 3071 hot side uses?) I am guessing maybe to keep the stock manifold on but then changing the whole manifold to a T3 flange will be less hassle (right)?. I don’t know how it looks it seems that smog did not see it either. An adapter must be thick to change the connection from EVO Twin scroll to T3 and that will drop the turbo to a lower position. Everything I am saying above is just from what I am gathering from Shiv and Dave post. Will see how things work out.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 01:43 AM
  #26  
JP98SS's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Rancho Cucamonga
Why is everybody glancing over the fact that the car has a sheetmetal intake manifold? There is no way that you can make more power with the stock manifold/adapter plate than a well thought out equal length manifold.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 06:30 AM
  #27  
housedj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
Thumbs up

not a bad #, however you could almost double that number if you used a 4G64 shortblock...
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 07:19 AM
  #28  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
Originally Posted by JP98SS
Why is everybody glancing over the fact that the car has a sheetmetal intake manifold? There is no way that you can make more power with the stock manifold/adapter plate than a well thought out equal length manifold.

Sheet intake will not yield that much difference at this power level, Maybe 5 or 10 WHP but not the 50 or the 40 WHP that Shiv achieved. Maybe the cams had some serious effect. Maybe the cams that they were used on the 3071 before (264 and the 272s)where over lapping. The 3071 is a new turbo and we just have to try to see how far we can play with it. Well, as we all see it can make amazing power and crazy early spool. Shiv that’s nice top end by the way I can’t wait for the tune day next week.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #29  
Kimbo63's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JP98SS
Why is everybody glancing over the fact that the car has a sheetmetal intake manifold?
Probably because it doesn't help significantly. I did some testing a ways back with the GT35R and I wasn't able to quantify any worthwhile gains. Maybe 5-10whp way up at 7800rpm but not much more. I think there are better designed sheetmetal intakes out there now and I am looking forward to trying them out.

FWIW, this is the first time we've tested a GT3071 that was running something other than the ATP hotside. As expected, the ATP hotside tends to lop off the low end and high end of the turbo it is bolted on to. I suspect this is due to machining tolerances being to high and the wheel-to-wall clearances being to big. In this application, I am using a standard Garret exhaust housing with our adapter piece that allows it to bolt on to the factory exhaust manifold as well as a Tial 38mm wastegate.

Shiv, on Kim's computer

Last edited by Kimbo63; Mar 27, 2005 at 09:38 AM.
Old Mar 27, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #30  
alex_alex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Az3ar
Alex keep this $hit on topic and stop acting like a baby. GEE....

Oh how the soreness shows. Its very convenient for you to be wrong for so long, and when someone finally brings it to light, and i comment on it, for you to just brush it off by telling me to stop acting like a baby.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 PM.