Utah Evos
Tough to do any car stuff when I'm focusing so much of my time on school.
[quote=Evolution IVGSR;8027346]Hey can you Build Web Sites? Particularly ones that Someone can Sell stuff on like a retail site? PM me if you want.
/quote]
Unfortunately, I am not a webmaster, and have very little experience building web pages.
Nice man! My coworker built one. He uses it to cut his own circuit boards and what not. It's a pretty crazy setup.
Thanks, this is good info. 
Because I'm already going to be switching over to the jdm map sensor to log boost (not controll it for now...), its pretty clear I'm going to need to ditch the accessport. Once I do that, it'll be wideband into the ecu time as well. Thanks for all the input, guys.
/quote]
Unfortunately, I am not a webmaster, and have very little experience building web pages.
Nice man! My coworker built one. He uses it to cut his own circuit boards and what not. It's a pretty crazy setup.
Because I'm already going to be switching over to the jdm map sensor to log boost (not controll it for now...), its pretty clear I'm going to need to ditch the accessport. Once I do that, it'll be wideband into the ecu time as well. Thanks for all the input, guys.
On a different note ... I think we need to keep pressure on the Utah Legislature concerning Senate Bill 106. I bet that with two members absent on the committee that is why that muffler law went through committee and actually got out on the floor.
I believe they are trying a "tactic" of get something onto the floor and then amend it into submission where something {different} will pass. This is all too common for bills that haven't been "researched" beforehand. In fact I would use the argument in any letter you send to your senator / house rep. that if the bill is undergoing amendments, are they being trained within a few "hours" to become experts on automobile mechanics?
In current form the bill states the muffler addon will have to "perform to the same specifications" as the "OE equipment." Yet ... "same specifications" is a very loose term for a law, especially when 99% of the cases they will pull into court will be on basis of enforcement harassment. i.e. We "think" you're not to the same specs.
Personally, they already have noise limits on exhaust, and if they can't enforce that then I don't see the usage of yet another bill where it puts the onus on the consumer to prove the exhaust is "legal."
Yes my stock cat is already turning into mush, its within a few weeks of installing something new. :P
~j.
I do
school first then i can spoil evaHappy b-day man
Thanks for the tip ...
On a different note ... I think we need to keep pressure on the Utah Legislature concerning Senate Bill 106. I bet that with two members absent on the committee that is why that muffler law went through committee and actually got out on the floor.
I believe they are trying a "tactic" of get something onto the floor and then amend it into submission where something {different} will pass. This is all too common for bills that haven't been "researched" beforehand. In fact I would use the argument in any letter you send to your senator / house rep. that if the bill is undergoing amendments, are they being trained within a few "hours" to become experts on automobile mechanics?
In current form the bill states the muffler addon will have to "perform to the same specifications" as the "OE equipment." Yet ... "same specifications" is a very loose term for a law, especially when 99% of the cases they will pull into court will be on basis of enforcement harassment. i.e. We "think" you're not to the same specs.
Personally, they already have noise limits on exhaust, and if they can't enforce that then I don't see the usage of yet another bill where it puts the onus on the consumer to prove the exhaust is "legal."
Yes my stock cat is already turning into mush, its within a few weeks of installing something new. :P
~j.
On a different note ... I think we need to keep pressure on the Utah Legislature concerning Senate Bill 106. I bet that with two members absent on the committee that is why that muffler law went through committee and actually got out on the floor.
I believe they are trying a "tactic" of get something onto the floor and then amend it into submission where something {different} will pass. This is all too common for bills that haven't been "researched" beforehand. In fact I would use the argument in any letter you send to your senator / house rep. that if the bill is undergoing amendments, are they being trained within a few "hours" to become experts on automobile mechanics?
In current form the bill states the muffler addon will have to "perform to the same specifications" as the "OE equipment." Yet ... "same specifications" is a very loose term for a law, especially when 99% of the cases they will pull into court will be on basis of enforcement harassment. i.e. We "think" you're not to the same specs.
Personally, they already have noise limits on exhaust, and if they can't enforce that then I don't see the usage of yet another bill where it puts the onus on the consumer to prove the exhaust is "legal."
Yes my stock cat is already turning into mush, its within a few weeks of installing something new. :P
~j.
You haven't gotten safety and emissions have you. Won't it not pass emissions like that since the computer will say not ready or something like that?
I hear you man, just barely got my inner and outer tie rod ends done. Now i need to install my rotors, pads, steal lines, brake fluid, and paint my calipers that i've had the stuff in my room for 8 months.
I hear you man, just barely got my inner and outer tie rod ends done. Now i need to install my rotors, pads, steal lines, brake fluid, and paint my calipers that i've had the stuff in my room for 8 months.
school>>job>>money>>then car stuff
oh yea and more 
Happy birthday old man
