Lancer Engine Damper
Originally Posted by reTro
I don't think it gets any stiffer than the mounts!!!? I can't see how the dampener would be any better? Maybe more comfortable since it's basically a shock that is "tuned" to react to large movements as opposed to just normal engine vibration that a solid motor mount would transfer to the cabin.
In my opinion, if I was to get one or the other, I'd get the dampener since it basically works when needed. This is definitely on my list!!!
In my opinion, if I was to get one or the other, I'd get the dampener since it basically works when needed. This is definitely on my list!!!
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 3
From: Boulder, Colorado
Lancer Engine Damper
Otter - No Drilling! Strictly bolt-on. Two bolts of the engine mount and all three of the strut bolts.
CarnEvil - The damper itself will be more like a bracket with elastomeric inserts on each end. Any adjustability will only come with changing the durometer of the inserts. Beta testing will establish whether or not my first pick for durometer is in the ballpark. The elastomeric inserts will perform some dampening function, but after seeing my car do the drivetrain lash thing on the dyno, I came to the realization that basically the engine motion needs to be restricted more than dampened - back to the fact that all three engine mounts contribute to drivetrain lash. Limiting the engine motion on one mount will help noticably, I think, but then again there are those other two.
No vibration transmitted to the car is a design criterion.
reTro - I'm not sure that the performance of my upcoming product will be as good as changing out all three engine mounts. Also as stated above, non-transmission of vibration will be important to me. It will be easier to install than changine three motor mounts, however. Also, I don't know what three engine mounts cost, (post it?) but I think my product willl cost less.
death - I got the PM - thanks.
All - Please be patient - in the design life of a product, there is only one opportunity to do design and beta testing. The 2.0 and the 2.4 engine mounts are different, of course, (
) so two non-interchangable brackets have to be designed. After the product is out is not the time to start on a redesign program because you screwed it up the first time.
- Rob@Zaklee
CarnEvil - The damper itself will be more like a bracket with elastomeric inserts on each end. Any adjustability will only come with changing the durometer of the inserts. Beta testing will establish whether or not my first pick for durometer is in the ballpark. The elastomeric inserts will perform some dampening function, but after seeing my car do the drivetrain lash thing on the dyno, I came to the realization that basically the engine motion needs to be restricted more than dampened - back to the fact that all three engine mounts contribute to drivetrain lash. Limiting the engine motion on one mount will help noticably, I think, but then again there are those other two.
No vibration transmitted to the car is a design criterion.
reTro - I'm not sure that the performance of my upcoming product will be as good as changing out all three engine mounts. Also as stated above, non-transmission of vibration will be important to me. It will be easier to install than changine three motor mounts, however. Also, I don't know what three engine mounts cost, (post it?) but I think my product willl cost less.
death - I got the PM - thanks.
All - Please be patient - in the design life of a product, there is only one opportunity to do design and beta testing. The 2.0 and the 2.4 engine mounts are different, of course, (
) so two non-interchangable brackets have to be designed. After the product is out is not the time to start on a redesign program because you screwed it up the first time.
- Rob@Zaklee
Originally Posted by robert5995
Otter - No Drilling! Strictly bolt-on. Two bolts of the engine mount and all three of the strut bolts.
CarnEvil - The damper itself will be more like a bracket with elastomeric inserts on each end. Any adjustability will only come with changing the durometer of the inserts. Beta testing will establish whether or not my first pick for durometer is in the ballpark. The elastomeric inserts will perform some dampening function, but after seeing my car do the drivetrain lash thing on the dyno, I came to the realization that basically the engine motion needs to be restricted more than dampened - back to the fact that all three engine mounts contribute to drivetrain lash. Limiting the engine motion on one mount will help noticably, I think, but then again there are those other two.
No vibration transmitted to the car is a design criterion.
reTro - I'm not sure that the performance of my upcoming product will be as good as changing out all three engine mounts. Also as stated above, non-transmission of vibration will be important to me. It will be easier to install than changine three motor mounts, however. Also, I don't know what three engine mounts cost, (post it?) but I think my product willl cost less.
death - I got the PM - thanks.
All - Please be patient - in the design life of a product, there is only one opportunity to do design and beta testing. The 2.0 and the 2.4 engine mounts are different, of course, (
) so two non-interchangable brackets have to be designed. After the product is out is not the time to start on a redesign program because you screwed it up the first time.
- Rob@Zaklee
CarnEvil - The damper itself will be more like a bracket with elastomeric inserts on each end. Any adjustability will only come with changing the durometer of the inserts. Beta testing will establish whether or not my first pick for durometer is in the ballpark. The elastomeric inserts will perform some dampening function, but after seeing my car do the drivetrain lash thing on the dyno, I came to the realization that basically the engine motion needs to be restricted more than dampened - back to the fact that all three engine mounts contribute to drivetrain lash. Limiting the engine motion on one mount will help noticably, I think, but then again there are those other two.
No vibration transmitted to the car is a design criterion.
reTro - I'm not sure that the performance of my upcoming product will be as good as changing out all three engine mounts. Also as stated above, non-transmission of vibration will be important to me. It will be easier to install than changine three motor mounts, however. Also, I don't know what three engine mounts cost, (post it?) but I think my product willl cost less.
death - I got the PM - thanks.
All - Please be patient - in the design life of a product, there is only one opportunity to do design and beta testing. The 2.0 and the 2.4 engine mounts are different, of course, (
) so two non-interchangable brackets have to be designed. After the product is out is not the time to start on a redesign program because you screwed it up the first time.
- Rob@Zaklee
And about the engine mounts, will it help if i filled them like in the Do-it-yourself motormount hardening process? I know it eliminates wheel hop, does it also eliminate or minimize the "lash"?
i highly doubt this will fix the 1st-2nd grind.... the mounts keep the engine in place perfectly, my engine dont move what so ever... i dont see how this dampner will fix the problem considering the mounts make the motor as tight as possible... i think it has to do with the transmission... somebody really needs to look into this problem.. It maybe costly, but the 1st-2nd gear shift is the most important shift (other then nuetral-1st gear). If you hit that shift perfectly, you chirp 2nd gear and really feel that hp and tq like you wouldnt beleive, but with this gear problem, we cant bang the gears out perfectly, so even if its 500,800, even 1100 dollars to fix, im more then willing to pay to get it fixed. Not only should the problem be fixed, but maybe the tranny will be better/stronger afterwards...
maybe roadrace should make a 6 gear transmission for our ralliart, or just modify the evo mr 6 gear tranny to fit our car.... yea i'd absolutly pay a couple g's for that
anybody got any input on this?
maybe roadrace should make a 6 gear transmission for our ralliart, or just modify the evo mr 6 gear tranny to fit our car.... yea i'd absolutly pay a couple g's for that
anybody got any input on this?
It has to be a syncro or something, especially if it's happening at a high RPM say you shift from 1 st into 2nd at 6000 and it does it but not at 2500 rPM it probably means your syncro is on the way out.
When it finally does go out you will have grinding every shift unless timed perfectly. This is only from my experience with a previous car where I drove about 20000 kms with grinding only in high rpm only, Then one day it just totally blew.
When it finally does go out you will have grinding every shift unless timed perfectly. This is only from my experience with a previous car where I drove about 20000 kms with grinding only in high rpm only, Then one day it just totally blew.
Originally Posted by Ralliart_on_LSD
i highly doubt this will fix the 1st-2nd grind.... the mounts keep the engine in place perfectly, my engine dont move what so ever... i dont see how this dampner will fix the problem considering the mounts make the motor as tight as possible... i think it has to do with the transmission... somebody really needs to look into this problem.. It maybe costly, but the 1st-2nd gear shift is the most important shift (other then nuetral-1st gear). If you hit that shift perfectly, you chirp 2nd gear and really feel that hp and tq like you wouldnt beleive, but with this gear problem, we cant bang the gears out perfectly, so even if its 500,800, even 1100 dollars to fix, im more then willing to pay to get it fixed. Not only should the problem be fixed, but maybe the tranny will be better/stronger afterwards...
maybe roadrace should make a 6 gear transmission for our ralliart, or just modify the evo mr 6 gear tranny to fit our car.... yea i'd absolutly pay a couple g's for that
anybody got any input on this?
maybe roadrace should make a 6 gear transmission for our ralliart, or just modify the evo mr 6 gear tranny to fit our car.... yea i'd absolutly pay a couple g's for that
anybody got any input on this?
Here's a short thread from a local Evo that had them do work:
http://www.mievo.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=170
Downside is that you'll have to drop your tranny, ship it, wait for them to do it, then reinstall. Would be without your car for a week or two.
Last edited by otter; Oct 6, 2005 at 07:33 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 3
From: Boulder, Colorado
Lancer Engine Damper
Hi, All,
I could use some help here.
I need Lancer 2.0 people and 2.4 people to answer the same question for me, please.
- How far is it from the edge of the casting that is the passenger-side engine mount to the cam drive cover? I think it's around 1/4", but since I have neither car in my garage, this is a situation where I can't get this myself.
- It is a hard place to measure, so as an alternative, you may measure from the cam drive housing to the nearest bolt, which is (correct me here, if I'm wrong) the center bolt on a 2.4, and both the front and rear bolts on the 2.0 mount. I have the 2.0 and 2.4 engine mounts here in my shop, but I don't have the rest of the engine, so I can't measure it!
Thanks, Guys, please PM me with results, so I can get on with fabricating my brackets.
- Rob@Zaklee
I could use some help here.
I need Lancer 2.0 people and 2.4 people to answer the same question for me, please.
- How far is it from the edge of the casting that is the passenger-side engine mount to the cam drive cover? I think it's around 1/4", but since I have neither car in my garage, this is a situation where I can't get this myself.
- It is a hard place to measure, so as an alternative, you may measure from the cam drive housing to the nearest bolt, which is (correct me here, if I'm wrong) the center bolt on a 2.4, and both the front and rear bolts on the 2.0 mount. I have the 2.0 and 2.4 engine mounts here in my shop, but I don't have the rest of the engine, so I can't measure it!
Thanks, Guys, please PM me with results, so I can get on with fabricating my brackets.
- Rob@Zaklee
-
Damn!!! Will someone please answer Robert's question... I feel really bad about it, I told him I would do it and always ended up forgetting or waiting for my g/f to get the car home.
Please somebody measure this so Rob can finally make the part and sell it to us...
-
Damn!!! Will someone please answer Robert's question... I feel really bad about it, I told him I would do it and always ended up forgetting or waiting for my g/f to get the car home.

Please somebody measure this so Rob can finally make the part and sell it to us...

-
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 3
From: Boulder, Colorado
Lancer Engine Damper
Daddy -
I'm making parts, although I would have loved some definitive numbers from all the Lancer folks who, just a bit ago, wanted to start a list for this part. I think I know how far away the timing case is from the motor mount, and I hope I'm right, or I'll have to scrap some proto parts. Again, I could use some Boulder, Denver locals for measuring and fitting. If some Boulder, Denver local can respond here, they are welcomed to beta test the damper.
Maybe I'll just have to buy myself a Lancer 2.4 to get this project fully engineered.
- Rob@Zaklee
I'm making parts, although I would have loved some definitive numbers from all the Lancer folks who, just a bit ago, wanted to start a list for this part. I think I know how far away the timing case is from the motor mount, and I hope I'm right, or I'll have to scrap some proto parts. Again, I could use some Boulder, Denver locals for measuring and fitting. If some Boulder, Denver local can respond here, they are welcomed to beta test the damper.
Maybe I'll just have to buy myself a Lancer 2.4 to get this project fully engineered.
- Rob@Zaklee







