Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Ralliart vs the world

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:05 PM
  #46  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
A properly tuned 2.0 L WRX can be a pretty quick car, probably comparable to a Ralliart. The problem is getting a good tune, it's not easy and the simple design of the motor doesn't make for the torquest of cars. That said we have some local guys that are making ridiculous numbers on the stock turbo with meth injection and a lot of time getting the bugs out.
Neither the STI nor the Evo suffer from a lack of power under the curve so to speak, they both have quick spooling turbos and they both have a crap load of grunt. A RA with a TBE and a reflash will likely be equivalent to an Evo but with maybe a bit more throttle response down low given the smaller turbo size. The obvious problem will be a lack of top end, you can't have the best of both worlds.
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 11:30 AM
  #47  
Amos's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
no argu, RA sure win
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 10:07 AM
  #48  
DatRAzn's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 7
From: Michigan
How about this,

Being in the Detroit area, I've seen multiple 2010 Camaros on the road already, and most of which are V6 (not surprising in current state of economy, apparently people just want the new Camaro and not the SS price...) . I'd like to see how they run on a track and/or drag strip compared to our RAs.

2010 Camaro LS Coupe (V6, 298hp/268tq, curb weight (minus driver) 3780lbs)
Stock tires on the LS are 245/55 r18.

What do you guys think?
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 01:22 PM
  #49  
jazket's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Florida
Originally Posted by DetroitRA
How about this,

Being in the Detroit area, I've seen multiple 2010 Camaros on the road already, and most of which are V6 (not surprising in current state of economy, apparently people just want the new Camaro and not the SS price...) . I'd like to see how they run on a track and/or drag strip compared to our RAs.

2010 Camaro LS Coupe (V6, 298hp/268tq, curb weight (minus driver) 3780lbs)
Stock tires on the LS are 245/55 r18.

What do you guys think?
38 hundred pounds, that's porkish; no AWD, you'll def take him off the line. I don't know about the Camaro's 1/4 mile times though. Our RA's are in the low 14 I believe (not sure exactly)
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #50  
laksman91's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
My buddy's cousin is claiming his CSX is better at the track compared to the RA some people are funny
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #51  
DatRAzn's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 7
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by jazket
38 hundred pounds, that's porkish; no AWD, you'll def take him off the line. I don't know about the Camaro's 1/4 mile times though. Our RA's are in the low 14 I believe (not sure exactly)
According to Edmunds, "The V6 (Camaro) coupe will cover the quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds with an auto and 14.7 seconds with a manual, both at 97 mph."
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=129496

And our RA, "At the track our Ralliart test car sprinted to 60 mph in 5.8 seconds and unreeled the quarter-mile in 14.2 seconds."
http://www.edmunds.com/mitsubishi/la...vemanual1.html

So it looks like, according to edmunds, we're .5 seconds faster than the v6 Camaro in the 1/4 mile. The SS, however, runs 1/4 mile @ 13.3~13.4.
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 08:51 AM
  #52  
jazket's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Florida
Originally Posted by DetroitRA
According to Edmunds, "The V6 (Camaro) coupe will cover the quarter-mile in 14.5 seconds with an auto and 14.7 seconds with a manual, both at 97 mph."
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=129496

And our RA, "At the track our Ralliart test car sprinted to 60 mph in 5.8 seconds and unreeled the quarter-mile in 14.2 seconds."
http://www.edmunds.com/mitsubishi/la...vemanual1.html

So it looks like, according to edmunds, we're .5 seconds faster than the v6 Camaro in the 1/4 mile. The SS, however, runs 1/4 mile @ 13.3~13.4.
Oh, the SS has Evo times! nice
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 11:30 AM
  #53  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
Beat an S2000(modded), Coblat SS/SC(stock), 09 Eclipse GT V6(stock).
They were all running 15’s ,except for the Eclipse which ran a best of 14.9
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 07:51 PM
  #54  
zweetz32's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by IdriveRA
Beat an S2000(modded), Coblat SS/SC(stock), 09 Eclipse GT V6(stock).
They were all running 15’s ,except for the Eclipse which ran a best of 14.9

The s2000 driver can't drive! I had a s2k with just exhaust and I ran a 13.8. The driver is either not launching it at redline or he just simply can't drive.
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 09:06 AM
  #55  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
Originally Posted by zweetz32
The s2000 driver can't drive! I had a s2k with just exhaust and I ran a 13.8. The driver is either not launching it at redline or he just simply can't drive.
I thought the same thing about the s2000, maybe he was being cautious.
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 09:13 AM
  #56  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Don't forget altitude, NA cars really lose power as the altitude goes up.
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #57  
zweetz32's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
they don't lose 2 seconds though.
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #58  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
They could lose over a second if it's really high altitude.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 05:09 AM
  #59  
lancerdave86's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Hardyston, NJ
yet to c a Camaro. Wouldnt buy a car from a company that might not be around for long
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #60  
hibby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by lancerdave86
yet to c a Camaro.
...because they're not out yet.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:10 AM.