2009 Lancer Ralliart - GST Basemap
Jun 29, 2012, 08:36 PM
#3301
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Mi
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bal 21. What can I say? You all have said it all. Everyone with feed back has been dead on. Rich & Razor have been on point with responses and the development! Other than the 3/4 WOT slip (3rd to 4th) for me, (dam SST) this is the best of the best
There is control of the power, quick shifts to 6th gear (slow drive up to 40mph), WOT off the line has no slip, and if you feather the gas you can get around that delay and pull HARD, smooth, & wicked out the hole
I'm still getting over 300mi/tank but I think I could get more but can't manage to get my foot off the accelerator
Everyone to there PayPal accounts. Rich & Razor deserve it
Jun 30, 2012, 05:11 PM
#3302
Evolved Member
You can paypal Rich using this username: raxpatch@gmail.com
Jul 14, 2012, 02:41 PM
#3308
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quick question, are the boost targets for the 93 oct boost pill + TBE map and boost pill + TBE + AEM map the same?
The reason I ask is because I did some logcfg logging on the boost pill + TBE and I was consistently hitting max boost of 24-24.5 psi and now with the boost pill + TBE + AEM i am hitting max psi of 22.4-22.9
The only two things that I can imagine would be different (and im really grasping at straws here) is that I could have not properly tightened down all the couplers on the AEM OR that this has something to do with the 10 degree farenheit temp difference between the logs?
The reason I ask is because I did some logcfg logging on the boost pill + TBE and I was consistently hitting max boost of 24-24.5 psi and now with the boost pill + TBE + AEM i am hitting max psi of 22.4-22.9
The only two things that I can imagine would be different (and im really grasping at straws here) is that I could have not properly tightened down all the couplers on the AEM OR that this has something to do with the 10 degree farenheit temp difference between the logs?
Jul 14, 2012, 05:57 PM
#3309
Evolved Member
Boost targets are exactly the same between "TBE" and "TBE+AEM". So are the underlying BWGDC settings.
They do differ between 91oct and 93oct, though...
Note that 24psi+ is above target. To see your actual boost target, load up your ROM in EcuFlash. Under "Direct Boost", open table "Boost Target #2 (Low Gear Range)". Check the right-most column... in psi.
If you don't have that table, download latest XML from Golden's site... goldenevo.com
Temperature variations aren't likely to account for a change like that - there are ROM patches in place for temp correction.
Rich
They do differ between 91oct and 93oct, though...
Note that 24psi+ is above target. To see your actual boost target, load up your ROM in EcuFlash. Under "Direct Boost", open table "Boost Target #2 (Low Gear Range)". Check the right-most column... in psi.
If you don't have that table, download latest XML from Golden's site... goldenevo.com
Temperature variations aren't likely to account for a change like that - there are ROM patches in place for temp correction.
Rich
Jul 14, 2012, 08:17 PM
#3311
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boost targets are exactly the same between "TBE" and "TBE+AEM". So are the underlying BWGDC settings.
They do differ between 91oct and 93oct, though...
Note that 24psi+ is above target. To see your actual boost target, load up your ROM in EcuFlash. Under "Direct Boost", open table "Boost Target #2 (Low Gear Range)". Check the right-most column... in psi.
If you don't have that table, download latest XML from Golden's site... goldenevo.com
Temperature variations aren't likely to account for a change like that - there are ROM patches in place for temp correction.
Rich
They do differ between 91oct and 93oct, though...
Note that 24psi+ is above target. To see your actual boost target, load up your ROM in EcuFlash. Under "Direct Boost", open table "Boost Target #2 (Low Gear Range)". Check the right-most column... in psi.
If you don't have that table, download latest XML from Golden's site... goldenevo.com
Temperature variations aren't likely to account for a change like that - there are ROM patches in place for temp correction.
Rich
Jul 15, 2012, 12:20 AM
#3314
Evolved Member
Yep, we've got 2012 covered!
Beta versions were linked in this post. That included full set of 2012 USDM Base Maps (ie. all tune variations). Make sure you pick the right one!
Since that beta, I've only applied a few final tweaks. Almost done and dusted. I can put up the latest versions for people to try... watch this space...
Rich
Beta versions were linked in this post. That included full set of 2012 USDM Base Maps (ie. all tune variations). Make sure you pick the right one!
Since that beta, I've only applied a few final tweaks. Almost done and dusted. I can put up the latest versions for people to try... watch this space...
Rich
Jul 15, 2012, 01:05 AM
#3315
Yep, we've got 2012 covered!
Beta versions were linked in this post. That included full set of 2012 USDM Base Maps (ie. all tune variations). Make sure you pick the right one!
Since that beta, I've only applied a few final tweaks. Almost done and dusted. I can put up the latest versions for people to try... watch this space...
Rich
Beta versions were linked in this post. That included full set of 2012 USDM Base Maps (ie. all tune variations). Make sure you pick the right one!
Since that beta, I've only applied a few final tweaks. Almost done and dusted. I can put up the latest versions for people to try... watch this space...
Rich