12.3@117 in Tucson (3100feet elevation)
I am the originator of the post. I want to stand up again for Rraulston and his car running a 12.3@117 or 12.4@118 ( I don't remember well)
The bottom line is that I believe it was his first time at the track, SIR(Tucson ) is already a very bad track(heat, altitude and track not pre'd most of the times)
Ray's car(Rraulston) has tires that are worn out, his clutch is still stock I belive.
I think he ran fantastic considering that the only STI running there was running high 14's to mid 15's . Remember he got the third fastest time of the night, the other two fastest were a Twin Turbo Corvette and a Turbo Mustang wich runs huges amounts of NOS
my .50c
The bottom line is that I believe it was his first time at the track, SIR(Tucson ) is already a very bad track(heat, altitude and track not pre'd most of the times)
Ray's car(Rraulston) has tires that are worn out, his clutch is still stock I belive.
I think he ran fantastic considering that the only STI running there was running high 14's to mid 15's . Remember he got the third fastest time of the night, the other two fastest were a Twin Turbo Corvette and a Turbo Mustang wich runs huges amounts of NOS
my .50c
Your friend will eventually get it. I know that setup has 11.5s all day. Good luck. Thanks for the few of you that believe me. I lift about 25-50% of the way when I shift just not all the way. Works very well and I dont side step the clutch I just drop it out very fast. Ive been racing all my cars this way for years and has never given me a problem. People have been amazed at how well my clutches have held up with the amount of racing I do. Its been like this with my last three cars. i ran a 14.2 in a bone stock integra type r and a 13.2 in my srt stock. People always hate because they cant duplicate.
low 12's with an exhaust and safc is a total joke here in so cal. His car would run mid 13's all day with 1.7-8 60ft. URghhhhh!!! I guess All his car will need to get in the 11's is a boost controller and in to the 10's with some race gas. What a bunch of BS.
I believe him, maybe he is just a great driver, and plus he is running these times at high altitude, so yeah I believe he could run even faster in southern california (Fontana)
Its the truth I cant help it. I think its possible at sealevel with good conditions to run 12.1 with this car. I have a dejon tool boost controller sitting in my toolbox also waiting to be installed. Maybe even an 11.9 with more boost. Sorry to burst everyones bubble but this is the times the car is running. Im thinking fuel pump and injectors next. My friend trapped 113@12.3 with exhaust, safc, fuel pump, and 680cc injectors and race gas. His 60s were not quite as good as mine. Three different times at the track. So i know its not just me running these times. 11s soon haters.
To the people that believe me thanks, Im proud of these times for the mods.
To the people that believe me thanks, Im proud of these times for the mods.
Originally Posted by whiteevo311
Those times are pathetic. im sorry but at 2700ft with just exhaust and safc i ran 12.3@111
This is also my first awd car and Im still learning. That car on the bottle should have went 11.5 all day long. I know its hard to drive a car with alot of power but there is a point where no matter what the car has to go fast because it just has that much power. I would be imbarrassed to post those times.
This is also my first awd car and Im still learning. That car on the bottle should have went 11.5 all day long. I know its hard to drive a car with alot of power but there is a point where no matter what the car has to go fast because it just has that much power. I would be imbarrassed to post those times.
Last edited by bs; Jun 16, 2005 at 12:44 PM.
check the website homey! ive ran faster times at every other track i have been to in the west. Woodburn, SIR, sacramento and spokane. This track is notorious for ****ty times. Man someone give me something to work with here, holy ****.
www.firebirdonline.com
The time before I ran a 12.4@112 but the 60s were only 1.78
www.firebirdonline.com
The time before I ran a 12.4@112 but the 60s were only 1.78
Originally Posted by whiteevo311
check the website homey! ive ran faster times at every other track i have been to in the west. Woodburn, SIR, sacramento and spokane. This track is notorious for ****ty times. Man someone give me something to work with here, holy ****.
www.firebirdonline.com
The time before I ran a 12.4@112 but the 60s were only 1.78
www.firebirdonline.com
The time before I ran a 12.4@112 but the 60s were only 1.78
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




