Notices
ECU Flash

log boost with JDM MAP sensor (updated instructions)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:08 PM
  #361  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Absolute pressure is what matters, but most everyone is used to thinking in psig.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #362  
GTLocke13's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 667
Likes: 1
From: Yorklyn, DE
But this means that your JDM MAP sensor boost control mod is the right way to control boost. Its looking at absolute, not gauge.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #363  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Load also scales roughly with absolute pressure. Both methods can work. Just depends on whether you want to set load targets or boost targets.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 08:55 PM
  #364  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by GTLocke13
But this means that your JDM MAP sensor boost control mod is the right way to control boost. Its looking at absolute, not gauge.
look at post 341
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #365  
GTLocke13's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 667
Likes: 1
From: Yorklyn, DE
That was the post that got me thinking about all this. My point is you don't have to do that. The controller is controlling to absolute pressure. If you set your boost to 20 psi and your boost adder to 14.7 psia, the controller is controlling to 34.7 psia. If the ambient pressure is 10.7 psia, the controller will control to 24 lbs of boost, but this is fine because its the 34.7 psia that matters to the motor. In this case, 24 lbs of boost is not overboost.

I think the boost correction works to the psia value, not the psig value.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #366  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by GTLocke13
That was the post that got me thinking about all this. My point is you don't have to do that. The controller is controlling to absolute pressure. If you set your boost to 20 psi and your boost adder to 14.7 psia, the controller is controlling to 34.7 psia. If the ambient pressure is 10.7 psia, the controller will control to 24 lbs of boost, but this is fine because its the 34.7 psia that matters to the motor. In this case, 24 lbs of boost is not overboost.

I think the boost correction works to the psia value, not the psig value.
All correct.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #367  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by GTLocke13
That was the post that got me thinking about all this. My point is you don't have to do that. The controller is controlling to absolute pressure. If you set your boost to 20 psi and your boost adder to 14.7 psia, the controller is controlling to 34.7 psia. If the ambient pressure is 10.7 psia, the controller will control to 24 lbs of boost, but this is fine because its the 34.7 psia that matters to the motor. In this case, 24 lbs of boost is not overboost.

I think the boost correction works to the psia value, not the psig value.
Yeah. i just went to 5000ft elevation the other day and my boost was 2.5lbs higher. Perfect curve and correction still.

Also the car didnt knock or anything. I didnt log but I have the CEL on knock patch.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 10:57 PM
  #368  
GTLocke13's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 667
Likes: 1
From: Yorklyn, DE
That sounds dead on. Pressure at 5000 ft is about 12.2 psia.

http://www.uigi.com/Atmos_pressure.html
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #369  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Just wanted to mention that I have a few JDM MAP sensors available. See first post for details.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #370  
cij911's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 1
From: Socal :)
Originally Posted by mrfred
Just wanted to mention that I have a few JDM MAP sensors available. See first post for details.
Is it possible to use the JDM MAP sensor to replace the MAF unit? Sorry if this was addressed earlier.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #371  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by cij911
Is it possible to use the JDM MAP sensor to replace the MAF unit? Sorry if this was addressed earlier.
Only if you intend to switch over to speed density (MAF no longer needed).
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #372  
cij911's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 1
From: Socal :)
Originally Posted by mrfred
Only if you intend to switch over to speed density (MAF no longer needed).
Yes, I would be interested in seeing the pros vs cons with speed density on the stock ecu (and the how tos) Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #373  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by cij911
Yes, I would be interested in seeing the pros vs cons with speed density on the stock ecu (and the how tos) Thanks
Its a complicated patch, so there is no "how-to", and there are no base ROMs with a patch pre-applied. From what I've seen, there's no obvious advantage to speed density.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #374  
cij911's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 1
From: Socal :)
Originally Posted by mrfred
Its a complicated patch, so there is no "how-to", and there are no base ROMs with a patch pre-applied. From what I've seen, there's no obvious advantage to speed density.
What advantages do you see using MAP to control boost instead of load?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #375  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by cij911
What advantages do you see using MAP to control boost instead of load?
Load and boost do not track perfectly with each other on Evos. In higher gears, the car will boost higher for a set load. I prefer to control boost directly rather than load.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.