log boost with JDM MAP sensor (updated instructions)
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I am leaving for Thailand for three weeks starting next Tuesday. If anyone wants a JDM MAP sensor soon, please send payment as soon as possible so I can get a sensor in the mail to you by Saturday.
yes, it was boosting fine 22-24 psi until about a three weeks ago. Then I started noticing that the peak boost value wasn't what it used to be (around 20 psi), which set me off on the JDM MAP mod so I could log what's going on. It seems like there was something wrong with the car to start with, and it just got worse over time.
Question: if the problem was a boost leak, would the WGDC read 100% since the turbo is trying to compensate for the loss the best it can?
Question: if the problem was a boost leak, would the WGDC read 100% since the turbo is trying to compensate for the loss the best it can?
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
yes, it was boosting fine 22-24 psi until about a three weeks ago. Then I started noticing that the peak boost value wasn't what it used to be (around 20 psi), which set me off on the JDM MAP mod so I could log what's going on. It seems like there was something wrong with the car to start with, and it just got worse over time.
Question: if the problem was a boost leak, would the WGDC read 100% since the turbo is trying to compensate for the loss the best it can?
Question: if the problem was a boost leak, would the WGDC read 100% since the turbo is trying to compensate for the loss the best it can?
12 psi represents a pretty major boost leak though. I would think that you could hear it.
The boost control system would definitely try to push up the WGDC to try to compensate for a boost leak. Whether it would reach it would depend on the response time setting you're using. The stock value of 10 causes relatively slow response.
12 psi represents a pretty major boost leak though. I would think that you could hear it.
12 psi represents a pretty major boost leak though. I would think that you could hear it.
! It's right at the turbo somewhere, and it's not the coupler between the LICP and the turbo, so it might be one of the WGA lines? I didn't have time to keep at it right now, but I'll search some more when I get home tonight.
There is a max WGDC vs Coolant temp table. Looks like this:
20c - 0.0% WGDC
30c - 0.0% WGDC
40c - 0.0% WGDC
50c - 0.0% WGDC
60c - 50.0% WGDC
70c - 100.0% WGDC
80c - 100.0% WGDC
82c - 100.0% WGDC
And a WGDC Limit table (Cold engine/ CEL) that looks like this:
63% WGDC
also a Max WGDC Correction table that looks like this:
0 TP - 0 correction
13 TP - 0 correction
25 TP - 0 correction
38 TP - 0 correction
50 TP - 0 correction
63 TP - 0 correction
75 TP - 0 correction
88 TP - 16 correction
100 TP - 16 correction
Here it is for ...015
<table name="Max WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="3f10" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
<table name="TPS" address="7284" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottleVoltage16"/>
</table>
<table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="65d0" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
<table name="Coolant Temp" address="70f8" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/>
</table>
The WGDC Limit Table I don't have the address as it's not from ecuflash
btw mrfred found the two tables...
<table name="Max WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="3f10" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
<table name="TPS" address="7284" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottleVoltage16"/>
</table>
<table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="65d0" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty">
<table name="Coolant Temp" address="70f8" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/>
</table>
The WGDC Limit Table I don't have the address as it's not from ecuflash
btw mrfred found the two tables...
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I know where that WGDC Limit Table is. In ECUFlash, its the "Min Temperature for Full Boost" setting. tephra and I have been talking about what that does. So that's what it does. I'll have to look at the code to see what flag controls whether or not it goes into action.
I think it's a different table in ecuflash as it has 85 in the table instead of the 63 my source has in it.
Of course my source could be wrong as well.
However 63 makes more sense to me since stock the WGDC's are 100%. A drop from 100% to 63% would be much less boost when the car is cold than 100% to 85%.
Of course my source could be wrong as well.
However 63 makes more sense to me since stock the WGDC's are 100%. A drop from 100% to 63% would be much less boost when the car is cold than 100% to 85%.
what does it log when no throttle?
you probably need to adjust the angle of the TPS sensor, not sure how.. probably some alignment bolts someplace
MrFred that mintemp thing is just a 1d value rather than a table. Still think its for something totally different :P hehe
you probably need to adjust the angle of the TPS sensor, not sure how.. probably some alignment bolts someplace

MrFred that mintemp thing is just a 1d value rather than a table. Still think its for something totally different :P hehe
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I think it's a different table in ecuflash as it has 85 in the table instead of the 63 my source has in it.
Of course my source could be wrong as well.
However 63 makes more sense to me since stock the WGDC's are 100%. A drop from 100% to 63% would be much less boost when the car is cold than 100% to 85%.
Of course my source could be wrong as well.
However 63 makes more sense to me since stock the WGDC's are 100%. A drop from 100% to 63% would be much less boost when the car is cold than 100% to 85%.
Temperature scaling -> 85C
WGDC scaling -> 63%
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I think it is a 1d table that razorlab is talking about.







