Notices
ECU Flash

log boost with JDM MAP sensor (updated instructions)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #391  
Inprogress's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Nevermind, I realized you can change the formula in Evoscan.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 04:18 PM
  #392  
DrivinMissDaisy's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
I ordered mine Monday and got it in Today. Already installed it and made the changes. Total process took less then 30 minutes.

time to go do some logging to see how it compares to my ZT-2 boost.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 12:03 AM
  #393  
Inprogress's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Sorry for the newb question, but what does the EGR test do? Is it ok to leave it enabled rather then disabling it?

Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #394  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Its supposed to test whether the EGR system is working properly. Its up to you whether you disable it. I would expect that some emissions test stations expect to see an EGR system test, so it should be enabled for those tests.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #395  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Great thread! Are these instructions for a specific version of ECUFlash or should they work with any of them? It didn't say in the first post. Also, I've seen that the latest version of ECUFlash is v1.34, but many people still seem to prefer v1.29a as the most dependable? Lastly, if v1.29a is the way to go, where can I get it? I checked the OpenECU site and AktiveMatrix, but neither have anything but the most recent version. Thanks!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 01:49 PM
  #396  
DrivinMissDaisy's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by voidhawk
Great thread! Are these instructions for a specific version of ECUFlash or should they work with any of them? It didn't say in the first post. Also, I've seen that the latest version of ECUFlash is v1.34, but many people still seem to prefer v1.29a as the most dependable? Lastly, if v1.29a is the way to go, where can I get it? I checked the OpenECU site and AktiveMatrix, but neither have anything but the most recent version. Thanks!
I have 1.34 and it worked with no problem.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #397  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
v1.34 is fine if you can get it to work with your cable. Some people are having problems with older cables working with newer versions of ECUFlash. ECUFlash will only work with genuine Tactrix cables. At least one batch of genuine cables were not setup with a proper internal ID, and they are not recognized by newer versions of ECUFlash. There is a software fix available from Tactrix. For the rest of the people who don't have a genuine cable, its ECUFlash v1.29a:

ftp://se30.dyndns.org/evo/

login: guest
pass: monster
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #398  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
I got it to work with v1.29a. The strange thing is that while I got logging to work, I somehow broke my boost control ... it used to boost 25 psi and taper to 24 at redline; after installing the JDM MAP sensor and flashing the ECU with the modified ROM, I can't get over 12 psi, both according to the log and my boost gauge, and of course the car feels like a wet rag. I don't know if the problem is software or hardware yet. I'll try to do a leak check tomorrow to rule out hardware for starters.

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #399  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Very odd. The area of the code that I modify to log boost has nothing to do with the boost control code.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #400  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by mrfred
Very odd. The area of the code that I modify to log boost has nothing to do with the boost control code.
I spent all day looking for boost leaks but did not find anything. Finally I gave up, installed the original MAP sensor, and flashed it back to the ROM before the install. No change (still no boost) ... so whatever it is, it has nothing to do with the logging mod, just seemed to have happened at the same time. I'll figure it out eventually ...
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #401  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Do you have a CEL? If you have a CEL that trips the low-boost table, you will be restricted to 56% duty cycle or something like that, or maybe 64%, can't remember off the top of my head now.

Did you log your BWDGC?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 01:32 AM
  #402  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
what low boost table?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 04:10 AM
  #403  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by tephra
what low boost table?
I'm pretty sure he means boost table #3 which kicks in above the BCLS.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 04:19 AM
  #404  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
But nothing todo with CEL hehe
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #405  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by razorlab
Do you have a CEL? If you have a CEL that trips the low-boost table, you will be restricted to 56% duty cycle or something like that, or maybe 64%, can't remember off the top of my head now.

Did you log your BWDGC?
No cell, I did some more logging last night and included WGDC this time. At this point my best guess is an ignition problem (I've ordered new plugs and wires) or a leak I haven't found yet. I did notice that the o-ring on the JDM MAP sensor is a little chewed up, but since swapping in the USDM one didn't make any difference I don't think that's it. Thanks for the help!

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 AM.