Just would like to make a quick update:

I thew in my old tune after realizing that I was running an untuned ROM for some reason. Well, sure enough, I did another pull and 0 knock through the entire pull at 12.0 AFR on pump gas (leaner than I will tune for). Wish I had at least this tune in for before/after comparison, but oh well.

Time to start tuning for these parts and see how much power I can find.

 

Edited. Attachment did not work.

 

This one has the Comparison Plot Fixed. I hope it is OK to post this. Credits to the creators!

 

Looks good, thanks. I think I focused on the base pull so much and forgot to go make sure I updated the comparison pull page too.

 

looks good. thanks. the only thing is theres gotta be, like a "sweetspot" in the code/formulas, for peak TQ hitting at the correct RPM, and the crossover point @ 5250. There was 1 version that hit @ the right RPM, but didnt crosover @ 5250, but instead @ 5000. Im more concerned w/ it showing peak TQ @ the right rpm, than I am about the crossover. I think once this get worked out, (if possible) this would be perfect! and could be used "accurately" as if it were a real dyno. Or atleast the next best thing.

 

It's most likely because of the smoothing. Try pasting your original numbers in the smoothed columns, after pasting them in the right columns, and see if it changes for the better.

 

Its not the smoothing....at all. removing the smoothing doesn't move the peak ranges over much at ALL. It just makes it unreadable.

 

By virtue of the calculation, the crossover point should be at 5250 rpm. I'll have to take a look to see why its not. Can you post up an example of where it doesn't cross at 5250 rpm?

 

It does cross at 5252 rpm, I messed up a formula once and his peak torque looked closer to his dyno results but it didn't crossover at 5252 rpm. I fixed my error since then.

 

heres the version that was closer to the correct rpm, but didnt crossover @ 5250.

 

Anyone know a way to have the averaging formula we use for the smoothing have a lookup variable so we can change the range that it averages? So we can add a "smoothing factor" value so the user can choose how far the averaging formula looks before/after the current cell. I know I'm explaining it poorly but hopefully someone will understand what I'm asking lol.

 

I'll do it today. Is your latest version in this thread?

 

Yeah, use post #108

 

much thanks to all who contributed to the thread.

 

+1 THANK YOU to all who contributed!