Notices
ECU Flash

2 byte versus Load calc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #31  
ThEHiTMaN's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
From: South FL
Those are 3rd gear logs?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 08:55 PM
  #32  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Whoop_ass
here is the log mr fred


and i have attached the EVOSCAN xml

i did notice even when i logged with my other laptop it was the same.
Your 2-byte load def in EvoScan looks fine. I still think that your measured 2-byte loads is not correct though. I think that its your aftermarket airbox causing erroneous load values.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #33  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
Originally Posted by mrfred
Your 2-byte load def in EvoScan looks fine. I still think that your measured 2-byte loads is not correct though. I think that its your aftermarket airbox causing erroneous load values.
I would agree there but the i have looked at other logs with the stock airbox and load calc is the same.

so how can load calc remain the same and 2 byte be so different?

Originally Posted by ThEHiTMaN
Those are 3rd gear logs?
ye this is 3rd gear up a hill
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 07:56 AM
  #34  
Tuner@Swift's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Taftville, CT
Loadcalc will be the same between airboxes because it DOES NOT take into consideration MAF frequency. Since you only changed the intake and not injector scaling or latency or voltage, then loadcalc will not change.


2byte load DOES include MAF frequency. So if you change the intake, which WILL effect MAF frequency, then ECU calculated load(2byte) will change.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 08:29 AM
  #35  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Whoop_ass
I would agree there but the i have looked at other logs with the stock airbox and load calc is the same.

so how can load calc remain the same and 2 byte be so different?


ye this is 3rd gear up a hill
Did you estimate load from your timing table?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:25 AM
  #36  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
Originally Posted by mixmastermatt
Loadcalc will be the same between airboxes because it DOES NOT take into consideration MAF frequency. Since you only changed the intake and not injector scaling or latency or voltage, then loadcalc will not change.


2byte load DOES include MAF frequency. So if you change the intake, which WILL effect MAF frequency, then ECU calculated load(2byte) will change.
Hmm so you reckon i got to rescale the maf then!!!
OMG that is a ball acke and not something i want to do.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #37  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
Originally Posted by mrfred
Did you estimate load from your timing table?
I don't understand what you mean mrfred??
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #38  
DanInPA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Chester Springs, PA
Based on your logs it shows "Timing" of 4, 5, or 6 for 3500 RPM or above before 4000 @ over 300 load. It is very inconsistent while there were no knock sum count. That is very strange.....

If you look at timing table, what do you see for "Load=300" & "RPM=3500"?

I bet you that "LoadCalc" is close to the actual timing ran in your car (based on your timeing table - High Octane Ignition Table. I suspect that EDM ECU does not like 2byte-Load Mod...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #39  
al\lupo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Originally Posted by DanInPA
I suspect that EDM ECU does not like 2byte-Load Mod...
No, I'm running 2-bytes load on EDM IX with no problems. It seems to really be a MAF issue (my car has stock intake - only filter is non stock).
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #40  
DanInPA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Chester Springs, PA
Oh, I see.... That would make sense... Perhaps, MAF reading is fluxuating with aftermarket intake..... But... then, ECU must have interpreted around 300 Load (if 2byte load was accurate)...

Why would there be flexuation of timing when there were no "knock sum" registered? I really don't understand how it can have 4, 5, & 6 for "Timing Advance" unless there were knock sum registered prior to these RPM (3500) to cause timing to be reduced.........
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #41  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Whoop_ass
I don't understand what you mean mrfred??
Post your timing table, and I'll show you what I mean.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #42  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
i understand what you mean!!

and yes it does seem as if my load and timing lines up but i will post up the timing table

thanks
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #43  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
please don't post the timing map if it's mine
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #44  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
then lets try rescale the MAF mellon
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
No_Skillz
ECU Flash
3
May 8, 2015 10:34 PM
Anubis18
ECU Flash
3
Jun 23, 2013 11:43 AM
JorgeYaHeard
ECU Flash
3
Aug 2, 2011 10:42 AM
sponners
ECU Flash
6
Jun 10, 2008 04:50 PM
mexevo
ECU Flash
11
Dec 19, 2007 11:38 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 PM.