The definitive EcuFlash Evo 10 thread

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 6, 2009 | 11:51 AM

#406

zTargeTz

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 630

Likes: 0

From: Alaska

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunzo

The MUT table is wrong .. I am verifying another set now .. once that is done I can get knock logging and full up ECU boost

I'm going to need your help to start reprogramming the software codes ..

Thanks mate ..

/excited!

if i can do anything. like.. umm.. clap my hands and cheer for your, just let me know.

Mar 6, 2009 | 05:39 PM

#407

Deepseadiver

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 1,102

Likes: 0

From: GUAM, USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by zTargeTz

/excited!

if i can do anything. like.. umm.. clap my hands and cheer for your, just let me know.

+1 thanks for the hard work!

Mar 7, 2009 | 03:20 AM

#408

mrfred

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (50)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 9,675

Likes: 132

From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunzo

There are more tables available .. I didn't release them because I can't verify them .. there's 2 more boost table backups and a host of other safety tiedowns (ie overboost protection and torque calculations) ..

The MUT table is wrong .. I am verifying another set now .. once that is done I can get knock logging and full up ECU boost

I'm going to need your help to start reprogramming the software codes ..

Thanks mate ..

The MUT table location for the USDM GSR ROMs is definitely correct. I've already correlated many of the RAM variables in the table to RAM variables assigned throughout the ROM code, and the positioning of the RAM variables in the table exactly matches the positioning in the Evo 8/9 ROMs.

I wouldn't be surprised if there were more tables that control boost-related CELs and limp modes, but I doubt there are actually any more boost control tables that are actually called by the code. In the Evo 8/9 ROM there were always some tables that were never called.

Mar 7, 2009 | 05:24 AM

#409

gunzo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 1,328

Likes: 0

From: Somewhere

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrfred

Haha .. you're rite .. its not the same on the JDM ROM .. I'm sorry .. the table is there, but there's no reference to the RAM addresses you mentioned .. but I found it on the USDM ROM ..

Oh no I wasn't referring to boost control .. its boost reference .. thats why alot of guys are having issues with EBC because of this multiple references ..

I'm tracing them as I go along ..

Mar 7, 2009 | 11:01 AM

#410

TTP Engineering

Account Disabled

iTrader: (465)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 8,824

Likes: 2

From: Central FL

Good work. Keep moving forward.

Mar 7, 2009 | 05:15 PM

#411

onboost

Evolving Member

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 109

Likes: 0

From: New Zealand

im testing evoscan X support and openport 2.0 tonight

Mar 7, 2009 | 07:13 PM

#412

mrfred

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (50)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 9,675

Likes: 132

From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR

Quote:

Originally Posted by onboost

im testing evoscan X support and openport 2.0 tonight

That's hot.

Mar 7, 2009 | 10:32 PM

#413

stokEd

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 1,271

Likes: 1

From: Denver, CO

Quote:

Originally Posted by onboost

im testing evoscan X support and openport 2.0 tonight

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrfred

That's hot.

Let us know how it goes!

Mar 7, 2009 | 10:35 PM

#414

stokEd

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 1,271

Likes: 1

From: Denver, CO

Quote:

Originally Posted by verkion

Hrm...just flipping through the processor manual...apparantly the rewrite durability is rated at 100 times? Really?

verkion

Oh wow, that's good to know. Hopefully someone can elaborate further.

Mar 7, 2009 | 11:05 PM

#415

zTargeTz

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 630

Likes: 0

From: Alaska

Quote:

Originally Posted by onboost

im testing evoscan X support and openport 2.0 tonight

woot?

big things BIG THINGS!

Mar 8, 2009 | 12:45 AM

#416

tephra

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 67

From: Melbourne, Australia

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunzo

and if we can fool tephra into selling his IX and jump onto the X .. then its gonna be all singing all dancing

hrmmm - you don't have a voodoo doll lying about do you

hehehe

Mar 8, 2009 | 01:19 AM

#417

zTargeTz

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 630

Likes: 0

From: Alaska

Look DEEP into the circles!

you WANT to buy an evo X... look deep into the circles....you WANT to buy an evo X... look deep into the circles....you WANT to buy an evo X... look deep into the circles....you WANT to buy an evo X... look deep into the circles....you WANT to buy an evo X... look deep into the circles....you WANT to buy an evo X... look deep into the circles....

Mar 8, 2009 | 03:20 AM

#418

mrfred

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (50)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 9,675

Likes: 132

From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR

Quote:

Originally Posted by stokEd

Oh wow, that's good to know. Hopefully someone can elaborate further.

The SH7052/7055 processors used in the Evo 8/9 are also rated at 100 reflashes, and several people are going on 1000 reflashes. Many are going on 100s, including myself.