Virtual Dyno Room-Dyno Simulator
well, the problem is that the way AEM exports it, it still counts in the same increments, but the RPM remains the same for like 5 counts instead of incrementing smoothly. If you got my VDR file in the email you can see what I'm talking about.
I'm not sure if that's causing an issue or not, but if we were able to change the sampling rate of VDR it may alleviate it.
I could be barking up the wrong tree completely.
I'm not sure if that's causing an issue or not, but if we were able to change the sampling rate of VDR it may alleviate it.
I could be barking up the wrong tree completely.
I forgot that I set up the latest versions of VDR to lookup the RPM in 50rpm increments (2500,2550,2600,etc..) and it only uses the last rpm value that occured if there are multiples (like your AEM is doing). So there shouldn't be any issues using logs like that. I will take a look at your AEM log in a little bit.
FYI, the 2008 EVOX MR (6 Speed) Comparison Dyno Plot isn't plotting when 4th gear is selected. 3rd gear is fine. Possibly a named value/range error? I didn't look into it much yet.
Thanks for this great tool though!
Thanks for this great tool though!
Whenever we get it tranferred over to an open source stand-alone version that is MUCH user friendly, I expect a lot of people to start using it with their logs. The kid making the stand-alone version might offer it up to Hamish to replace the current (inadequate) simulator built into Evoscan. So there would be a universal version and the built-in Evoscan version. Now that'd be flippin' sweet.
Thanks for the kind words
Whenever we get it tranferred over to an open source stand-alone version that is MUCH user friendly, I expect a lot of people to start using it with their logs. The kid making the stand-alone version might offer it up to Hamish to replace the current (inadequate) simulator built into Evoscan. So there would be a universal version and the built-in Evoscan version. Now that'd be flippin' sweet.
Whenever we get it tranferred over to an open source stand-alone version that is MUCH user friendly, I expect a lot of people to start using it with their logs. The kid making the stand-alone version might offer it up to Hamish to replace the current (inadequate) simulator built into Evoscan. So there would be a universal version and the built-in Evoscan version. Now that'd be flippin' sweet.WOW that would be awesome. I can't wait for that. It might give me a reason to update my Evoscan
what % do you guys use to work out at the flywheel figures?
tried it on my evo 6 and came out at 302whp and 295wtq
......only running 1.4bar of boost though.
maybe my drag and area settings are wrong.
tried it on my evo 6 and came out at 302whp and 295wtq
......only running 1.4bar of boost though.
maybe my drag and area settings are wrong.
The program doesn't do any flywheel data at all. All data is measured at the wheels in your datalogs. I would try the Evo 7 settings for drag and frontal area to get you in the ballpark. The most important items are ACTUAL vehicle weight and gear ratios.
Well here is my latest with VDR. I switched out my AMS Street Core for there Race Core today and did some before and after results. With AMS Street core run i had little less then half a tank and no added weight in the car so i kept my 250lb Occupant weight. Now for the Race Core i had my Street core in the car.. whole kit and had JUST filled up so the tank so i added 50lbs... I figured this was about right with the added weight of the AMS FMIC kit in the car and the 7 gallons of fuel i added to the tank... Actually it was prolly a little more then 50lbs but oh well.. My IATs were cut over half with this core!!! Same PSI level as well about 37.5psi on my 850R. VERY pleased so far especially with NO tuning yet
I could feel the difference by the butt dyno but couldn't wait to get home to see the results on VDR to see just how much!
Last edited by Colt4g63; Oct 8, 2009 at 06:23 PM.


