Notices
ECU Flash

Virtual Dyno Room-Dyno Simulator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #691  
whoflungpoo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
well, the problem is that the way AEM exports it, it still counts in the same increments, but the RPM remains the same for like 5 counts instead of incrementing smoothly. If you got my VDR file in the email you can see what I'm talking about.

I'm not sure if that's causing an issue or not, but if we were able to change the sampling rate of VDR it may alleviate it.

I could be barking up the wrong tree completely.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #692  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
I forgot that I set up the latest versions of VDR to lookup the RPM in 50rpm increments (2500,2550,2600,etc..) and it only uses the last rpm value that occured if there are multiples (like your AEM is doing). So there shouldn't be any issues using logs like that. I will take a look at your AEM log in a little bit.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #693  
verkion's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Over there!
FYI, the 2008 EVOX MR (6 Speed) Comparison Dyno Plot isn't plotting when 4th gear is selected. 3rd gear is fine. Possibly a named value/range error? I didn't look into it much yet.

Thanks for this great tool though!
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #694  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by verkion
FYI, the 2008 EVOX MR (6 Speed) Comparison Dyno Plot isn't plotting when 4th gear is selected. 3rd gear is fine. Possibly a named value/range error? I didn't look into it much yet.

Thanks for this great tool though!
Yeah, I gotta look into the 4th gear comparison error. Thanks It's always appreciated when you guys find an error and let me know. My goal is to make this sucker flawless.......someday
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #695  
crewdawg130's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC via Puerto Rico
This is great.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 09:07 AM
  #696  
evodood's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: cali
subscribed
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 09:24 AM
  #697  
Z_Lancer_Man's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 4
From: Albuquerque, NM
Any news on the standalone version?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #698  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by Z_Lancer_Man
Any news on the standalone version?
Not yet. The kid is swamped with college work so I wouldn't expect great leaps and bounds until he free's up some time for it.
It IS is process, just slowly.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #699  
Show286's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air,MD
I absolutely love VDR. I would say DLL is obsolete now. I thank everyone involved it's helped me out a lot!!!
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 05:27 PM
  #700  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Originally Posted by Show286
I absolutely love VDR. I would say DLL is obsolete now. I thank everyone involved it's helped me out a lot!!!
Thanks for the kind words Whenever we get it tranferred over to an open source stand-alone version that is MUCH user friendly, I expect a lot of people to start using it with their logs. The kid making the stand-alone version might offer it up to Hamish to replace the current (inadequate) simulator built into Evoscan. So there would be a universal version and the built-in Evoscan version. Now that'd be flippin' sweet.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #701  
Show286's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air,MD
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
Thanks for the kind words Whenever we get it tranferred over to an open source stand-alone version that is MUCH user friendly, I expect a lot of people to start using it with their logs. The kid making the stand-alone version might offer it up to Hamish to replace the current (inadequate) simulator built into Evoscan. So there would be a universal version and the built-in Evoscan version. Now that'd be flippin' sweet.

WOW that would be awesome. I can't wait for that. It might give me a reason to update my Evoscan
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #702  
sponners's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: wales
what % do you guys use to work out at the flywheel figures?

tried it on my evo 6 and came out at 302whp and 295wtq

......only running 1.4bar of boost though.



maybe my drag and area settings are wrong.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 12:28 PM
  #703  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
The program doesn't do any flywheel data at all. All data is measured at the wheels in your datalogs. I would try the Evo 7 settings for drag and frontal area to get you in the ballpark. The most important items are ACTUAL vehicle weight and gear ratios.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #704  
Colt4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 742
Likes: 2
From: New Albany, IN
Well here is my latest with VDR. I switched out my AMS Street Core for there Race Core today and did some before and after results. With AMS Street core run i had little less then half a tank and no added weight in the car so i kept my 250lb Occupant weight. Now for the Race Core i had my Street core in the car.. whole kit and had JUST filled up so the tank so i added 50lbs... I figured this was about right with the added weight of the AMS FMIC kit in the car and the 7 gallons of fuel i added to the tank... Actually it was prolly a little more then 50lbs but oh well.. My IATs were cut over half with this core!!! Same PSI level as well about 37.5psi on my 850R. VERY pleased so far especially with NO tuning yet I could feel the difference by the butt dyno but couldn't wait to get home to see the results on VDR to see just how much!


Last edited by Colt4g63; Oct 8, 2009 at 06:23 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 04:55 AM
  #705  
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 2
From: Opelika,AL
Damn man, great gains! A great FMIC = good choice always

Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Oct 9, 2009 at 06:08 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:04 PM.