Notices
ECU Flash

94170715 V7 Issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 01:22 AM
  #166  
ace33joe's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 7
From: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Originally Posted by tephra
I thought Roadspike was talking about AFR closed loop control? Not boost/load error control?

If he is talking about periphery FAA bit 4 setting to be 1, it is already set to 1 at my rom.

Can you please describe Roadspike's fix in detail if it is related to the boost error problem?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 02:01 AM
  #167  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Well if RS's fix didn't work (or is already set for you - as per u say) - then you will need to log the variable I said...
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 02:51 AM
  #168  
ace33joe's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 7
From: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Originally Posted by tephra
Well if RS's fix didn't work (or is already set for you - as per u say) - then you will need to log the variable I said...
Ok, I will log the variable tonight.

Roadspike:

If there is something I miss about the closed loop control setting, please share the fix with us.

Thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 06:51 AM
  #169  
ace33joe's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 7
From: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Ok, I sent the log file to tephra.

Boost error is still stuck at the minimum.

I also found my injectors are maxed out and I get leaner after 6500rpm than I want. I guess it's time for bigger injectors.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #170  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Log with the boost control working for me at least
Attached Files
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #171  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
DANG....E85 loves timing. I wish I could run 8 degrees at peak....impressive. Looks like everything is working properly now.

I wonder if the issue is EvoScan related.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #172  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Appauldd
DANG....E85 loves timing. I wish I could run 8 degrees at peak....impressive. Looks like everything is working properly now.

I wonder if the issue is EvoScan related.
hehe only at low boost bro at 30psi it wont take that kind of timing.

The main problem i had was setting up the blasted boost Error and desired boost table to take into account that its psiA which is NOT psi.

So i had to add 14.5 psi to my base adder to directly control boost as needed.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 06:46 PM
  #173  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
Spool seems to come on a little late though. Might want to re-work the fuel and timing a bit to get some more spool out of it.

Sorry for being off topic.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 06:53 PM
  #174  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Appauldd
Spool seems to come on a little late though. Might want to re-work the fuel and timing a bit to get some more spool out of it.

Sorry for being off topic.
Yeah thats 2nd gear for ya I suppose i could probably get it to come up earlier not totally sure how to do it though. Been concentrating getting this romid speed density fully worked out before beating on the car too much for optimum spool up
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 07:21 PM
  #175  
ace33joe's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 7
From: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
I think I found the problem !!!

Roadspike gave me a hint about the boost adder.

I checked my boost adder scaling, and it was set to PSIa8 OMNI4 barMAP !!!

It is supped to be a 16 bit value not 8 bit value.

So if I change that 14.7 PSIa in 8 bit value to 16 bit value, I get 3766.9 PSIa !!!

No wonder why boost error was stuck at mininum, I can never reach the target boost which is the addition of boost adder and boost desired engine 'psi' value.

Ah, I am so sorry for causing extra work to tephra and other members here.

I will test this out tonight see if it is solved.

Thanks for the help !!!

Last edited by ace33joe; Apr 15, 2010 at 07:41 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #176  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah look at your BCLO - it's totally ****ed...

Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #177  
Raceghost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 21
From: Out West
I think I found the problem !!!

Roadspike gave me a hint about the boost adder.

I checked my boost adder scaling, and it was set to PSIa8 OMNI4 barMAP !!!

It is supped to be a 16 bit value not 8 bit value.

So if I change that 14.7 PSIa in 8 bit value to 16 bit value, I get 3766.9 PSIa !!!

No wonder why boost error was stuck at mininum, I can never reach the target boost which is the addition of boost adder and boost desired engine 'psi' value.

Ah, I am so sorry for causing extra work to tephra and other members here.

I will test this out tonight see if it is solved.

Thanks for the help !!!
Darn scalings. Hope this works. That does ask another question... Should the Desired Boost and Wastegate Duty tables also be in 16 bit scaling?

Thanks again Tephra.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 11:22 PM
  #178  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
nah 8 bit
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 01:22 PM
  #179  
Raceghost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 21
From: Out West
Ok, one more quick question about the gear based boost. Say I want my 1-3rd gear to boost higher than 4-5. I would utilize the low gear range to represent 1-3rd, utilizing the low WGDC correction range? High gear would be the opposite? I was assuming this was the theory behind the gear based boost?
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #180  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Raceghost
Ok, one more quick question about the gear based boost. Say I want my 1-3rd gear to boost higher than 4-5. I would utilize the low gear range to represent 1-3rd, utilizing the low WGDC correction range? High gear would be the opposite? I was assuming this was the theory behind the gear based boost?
Borrowing some pictures from myself

I'm assuming you setup the boost error tables correctly to handle changes in boost.




Now when you have the boost error correctly set you can setup the wategate duty and max boost in the right hand table here to be lower for gears 4 and 5 than the first three.

My example image shows a constant 30 dropping to 27ish psi but you don't have to follow that at all :P

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:33 PM.