Notices
ECU Flash

94170715 V7 Issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #226  
mfr122887's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Originally Posted by tephra
with the addition of BIGMAP the map locaitons have changed somewhat...

it's probably 3 = normal, 4 = altmap now
OK thank. So 8425 is still the correct address?

What MUT addresses are free other than the ones you use: 00 - 04, 40 - 43?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #227  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
Let me compare my XML see what's diff
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:26 PM
  #228  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
most of the MUT4X are free - but look in your logger and if your using it already then dont overwrite it hehehe

8425 should be correct
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #229  
mfr122887's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Originally Posted by tephra
most of the MUT4X are free - but look in your logger and if your using it already then dont overwrite it hehehe

8425 should be correct
Thanks.

So the only use for these addresses is for logging? So you can basically use anything you want as long as it isn't currently in use?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:43 PM
  #230  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
we think so - although there are some actuator tests and stuff in there as well...

but like I said, MUT4X's are pretty much ok to use...
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 07:26 AM
  #231  
chrisw's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
Thanks! I wanted to upgrade over the weekend and saw the rom was pulled...

thank you for all your hard work.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 10:56 AM
  #232  
mfr122887's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Originally Posted by tephra
most of the MUT4X are free - but look in your logger and if your using it already then dont overwrite it hehehe

8425 should be correct
Ok, I added 0x8425 to MUT44 and logged it. I was getting a response of 3 on regular maps and on alt maps. I have the ICS set to flash on alt maps, so I know they are activating.

I tried it on a few different MUTs with the same result. Can anyone confirm if 8425 is still correct?
Reply
Old May 1, 2010 | 06:16 PM
  #233  
chrisw's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
So I finally installed V7 today on my Evo..

My initial impressions are pretty good. The light throttle transitions are better, and the car feels smoother when accelerating.

My boost levels are not as consistant as before. I think I need to play around with the temp compensation tables. I am getting a 1-1.5psi fluxuation in boost when I first hit max boost. It's not over boosting, but hitting my max desired boost and then dropping by as much as 1.5 psi.

I have not tried any real tuning of the boost tables yet, other than turning down the boost a little for 1st and 2nd gear to prevent some knock that I was getting. (hitting higher load cells a little too quickly for the tune I have)


All the problems with the gear related boost issues seem to have been resolved, but I am having issues with getting values to log correctly in EvoScan, and also to display properly in Data Lab Log.

The only real issue I have is a persistant P01400 Manifold pressure differential. This happens on vacuum under light throttle, never under boost. It looks like the range values are not correct. This is with a JDM 3bar sensor, a sensor I know works (it was this morning before I loaded V7)

thoughts?
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 05:19 AM
  #234  
chmodlf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
Which evoscan values are not logging correctly?
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 05:51 AM
  #235  
chmodlf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
Tephra

What load is this rom using for timing and fuel? I have read different opinions. Some say that it is raw and others the compensated-baro-temp for timing and raw for fuel IIRC.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 05:56 AM
  #236  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
not sure the be honest... can't be bothered looking it up

but yeh there are 4 different loads and all the various subroutines use different ones..

suffice to say - that they are all within 20points of each other, and only really deviate at high load...
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 06:12 AM
  #237  
chrisw's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
Originally Posted by chmodlf
Which evoscan values are not logging correctly?
It is not a question of the data not getting logged, it is, but EvoScan definitions are incomplete, obsolete, or otherwise missing.

This problem is on my end, nothing to do with the V7 patch I think.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 08:07 AM
  #238  
chmodlf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
Confirmed that the alt map 8425 address is not working. It always reads 3. ICS display indicates that the map is switching.

???

Last edited by chmodlf; May 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #239  
chmodlf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
Can someone confirm that uses ECU boost that their Boost error and WCDC Correction is working. Mine always registers -3.087 for Boost error and 0 for WGDC Correction.

I was logging today and the WGDC did not correct downward when it should have.

All my settings appear to be correct. Wow another problem...

Last edited by chmodlf; May 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #240  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
well the boost error has already been covered in this thread... either your not going into open loop or your rpm activation/deactivation is wrong...

sorry about 8425, all the maps are located at 0x3xxxx - so it wont tell you what map your on...

try 0x8426...

does logging gears work? i take it you applied the gear fix?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 AM.