347 trq and 316 hp
Mar 16, 2009, 01:48 PM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: oceanside
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
347 trq and 316 hp
so i finally tuned my car after a year of mods installed few months after i got the car.
I have a evo ix stock internals with fugita5 intake and u/l intercooler pipes, hks ssq bov, perrin stealth mount intercooler, helix down pipe and test pipe, hks carbon ti catback, rc1000 injectors, walbro 255 fuel pump and aem tru boost gauge/controler. So my final numbers with 91octane was 316 hp and 347 trq at 26lbs of boost on a dynojet. I was told that my boost control wasnt holdin boost. it hits 26 lbs and tapers down to 18 lbs and with a gm boost solenoid and o2 housing my hp numbers would show improvement. What u guys think? Pretty good i think.
I have a evo ix stock internals with fugita5 intake and u/l intercooler pipes, hks ssq bov, perrin stealth mount intercooler, helix down pipe and test pipe, hks carbon ti catback, rc1000 injectors, walbro 255 fuel pump and aem tru boost gauge/controler. So my final numbers with 91octane was 316 hp and 347 trq at 26lbs of boost on a dynojet. I was told that my boost control wasnt holdin boost. it hits 26 lbs and tapers down to 18 lbs and with a gm boost solenoid and o2 housing my hp numbers would show improvement. What u guys think? Pretty good i think.
Mar 17, 2009, 10:53 AM
#4
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: oceanside
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
murf, the injectors were scaled down for my current setup. i plan on gettin a few more mods and run e85 or go with an fp red and run e85. i was expecting more hp also but the 8lbs of boost taper killed the hp numbers.
nonschlont, thanks. when he told me my final numbers and he started with tq and in my head i was like hell yeah mad tq and he told me my hp and i was expectin some numbers like tq and got a 316 i was a lil disappointed but my tq is better than some of the other evos with similar mods.
nonschlont, thanks. when he told me my final numbers and he started with tq and in my head i was like hell yeah mad tq and he told me my hp and i was expectin some numbers like tq and got a 316 i was a lil disappointed but my tq is better than some of the other evos with similar mods.
Mar 17, 2009, 11:00 AM
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Clarify...
"Injectors scaled down for my current set-up"...
There should be only one scale for your gas set up and your E85 set up.
I don't see the benefit in "scaled down for my current set-up" working out too well as evidenced by your numbers.
Do you have access to ECUFlash? I'm curious what your "scaled down" number is...
-E
"Injectors scaled down for my current set-up"...
There should be only one scale for your gas set up and your E85 set up.
I don't see the benefit in "scaled down for my current set-up" working out too well as evidenced by your numbers.
Do you have access to ECUFlash? I'm curious what your "scaled down" number is...
-E
Mar 17, 2009, 11:59 AM
#6
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: in a jet
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tq is definitely high compared to the hp numbers.
Here are a couple pointers, take the bov off and go back with the stocker or some sort of dv. The intake unless its an induction box type is probably robbing you power.
With those changes alone you should be back to normal whih would be in the mid 300whp range on a dj
Here are a couple pointers, take the bov off and go back with the stocker or some sort of dv. The intake unless its an induction box type is probably robbing you power.
With those changes alone you should be back to normal whih would be in the mid 300whp range on a dj
Mar 17, 2009, 05:43 PM
#7
Registered User
those guys are right i made 315whp with matching torque and i have not "pushed timing" fully yet.
this is at 24 psi down to 19psi.
all i got is a 3" TBE.
and the dynojet is SAE corrected, i think most in the states are STD which read slightly higher.
this is at 24 psi down to 19psi.
all i got is a 3" TBE.
and the dynojet is SAE corrected, i think most in the states are STD which read slightly higher.
Trending Topics
Mar 17, 2009, 05:56 PM
#8
so i finally tuned my car after a year of mods installed few months after i got the car.
I have a evo ix stock internals with fugita5 intake and u/l intercooler pipes, hks ssq bov, perrin stealth mount intercooler, helix down pipe and test pipe, hks carbon ti catback, rc1000 injectors, walbro 255 fuel pump and aem tru boost gauge/controler. So my final numbers with 91octane was 316 hp and 347 trq at 26lbs of boost on a dynojet. I was told that my boost control wasnt holdin boost. it hits 26 lbs and tapers down to 18 lbs and with a gm boost solenoid and o2 housing my hp numbers would show improvement. What u guys think? Pretty good i think.
I have a evo ix stock internals with fugita5 intake and u/l intercooler pipes, hks ssq bov, perrin stealth mount intercooler, helix down pipe and test pipe, hks carbon ti catback, rc1000 injectors, walbro 255 fuel pump and aem tru boost gauge/controler. So my final numbers with 91octane was 316 hp and 347 trq at 26lbs of boost on a dynojet. I was told that my boost control wasnt holdin boost. it hits 26 lbs and tapers down to 18 lbs and with a gm boost solenoid and o2 housing my hp numbers would show improvement. What u guys think? Pretty good i think.
If you look at my signature I have a similar set-up except I run 93 Octane.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
