Highest HP 4g63 engine (from 2007)
Still, I don't quite understand where all the doubting comes from.
The things that were shown in this thread surely support the higher numbers then we've seen before.
Surely nobody thinks that can be done on the same budget right?
So, what's it then? Jealousy? Different busines interests? What is it?
Best regards,
Walter
Your correct, oeps
Still, I don't quite understand where all the doubting comes from.
The things that were shown in this thread surely support the higher numbers then we've seen before.
Surely nobody thinks that can be done on the same budget right?
So, what's it then? Jealousy? Different busines interests? What is it?
Best regards,
Walter
Still, I don't quite understand where all the doubting comes from.
The things that were shown in this thread surely support the higher numbers then we've seen before.
Surely nobody thinks that can be done on the same budget right?
So, what's it then? Jealousy? Different busines interests? What is it?
Best regards,
Walter
Shiney parts do not impress me. I know some F1 design engineers on a personal level and share suppliers with them. I live in England and its a small place.
Jealousy is a trait i do not suffer, sorry.
Business interests? I have none in the evo world nor the turbo world. The evo is my hobby.
I was hoping to see something of interest and learn something new, i have no interest in criticising for the sake of it or joining a clan. The only reason for my last post here was after seeing other people being shot down for daring to question Spyros or plain ignored when asking what i felt were relevant questions. I'm sure he is just too busy to deal with everyone and perhaps the language barrier is partly to blame.
The title is "highest horsepower" That's a fairly bold and some would say arrogant claim to make which naturally will lead to people being expected to be accountable for such a bold statement. There are a lot of BS dyno claims in this world and then there are tuning firms that win races. I wish Spyros ever luck with his quest and if he is who i think he is then he will deliver some impressive results i'm sure.
Good day.
There a small discrepancy in the description. The car had 250 km trap speed which is 155.3 mph and not 159.4 mph as stated which is 256.4 km...
At over 150 mph traps, 4 mph difference is BIG in terms of needed power...
we had 162mph with this car last year. with just 1200hp.
This setup is capable of +400hp. We test it yesterday again also with another project also at same power level of 1200 and trying to setup launch control both. In 20 days we will rise the boost to 1400 - 1600hp
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tvfTcwTzIW4
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-z82qwpz0Sk
can anyone tell me what is the record 1/4 from real full interior 4cylinder 4wd? And also the trap speed? And then general from any stock full interior weight car no matter displacement or cylinder? thanks.
This setup is capable of +400hp. We test it yesterday again also with another project also at same power level of 1200 and trying to setup launch control both. In 20 days we will rise the boost to 1400 - 1600hp
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tvfTcwTzIW4
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-z82qwpz0Sk
can anyone tell me what is the record 1/4 from real full interior 4cylinder 4wd? And also the trap speed? And then general from any stock full interior weight car no matter displacement or cylinder? thanks.
Did AWD state on page 3 that they see 8's and mid 160's with 780bhp and full interior? Perhaps you should check the brakes aren't binding on your subaru ......
Last edited by user 72082032; Apr 2, 2012 at 03:08 PM. Reason: forgot speed
I didn't ask horsepower. i ask time. trap speed and weight. because this subaru is full interior. complete stock but 2 carbon seats nothing else changed from stock.
I don't want to doubt anyone i just ask to know if we will achieve something better.
i know only GTR alpha 12 8.9xx and omega 8.6xx. I dont know from 4cylinder
I don't want to doubt anyone i just ask to know if we will achieve something better.
i know only GTR alpha 12 8.9xx and omega 8.6xx. I dont know from 4cylinder
I didn't ask horsepower. i ask time. trap speed and weight. because this subaru is full interior. complete stock but 2 carbon seats nothing else changed from stock.
I don't want to doubt anyone i just ask to know if we will achieve something better.
i know only GTR alpha 12 8.9xx and omega 8.6xx. I dont know from 4cylinder
I don't want to doubt anyone i just ask to know if we will achieve something better.
i know only GTR alpha 12 8.9xx and omega 8.6xx. I dont know from 4cylinder
i am asking not from evo8 or general evo platform but any kind of street full interior 4 cylinder or any . The signature says world quickest evo8.
I prefer help me find it rather be another hatter posting here.
Last edited by Extreme Tuners; Apr 2, 2012 at 03:37 PM.
Why u hurry answer me? Try first to read my question and then.
i am asking not from evo8 or general evo platform but any kind of street full interior 4 cylinder or any . The signature says world quickest evo8.
I prefer help me find it rather be another hatter posting here.
i am asking not from evo8 or general evo platform but any kind of street full interior 4 cylinder or any . The signature says world quickest evo8.
I prefer help me find it rather be another hatter posting here.

Signature for that trap says street car and awd said in the post full interior. So full weight 4 cylinder road car not stripped drag car. Subarus have done 8's too with same power
Close to 1200 (1000whp) we had 162mph. we hope to have now 171-175mph from this setup.
We will see in 20 days.


