211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

Yes its me with the wrx. The evo is nothing like 323 ftlbs @ Efi logics at 3000 rpm with a STI 6mt and dccd off..

I bought your aps tmic the day I went to get tuned, aswell as one of your widebody projects. Admittedly that was over my head and needed something I could beat on sooner lol...

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

Ordered a Muse O2 dump. I need big fmic and want a cop

project_skyline

iTrader: (30)

FMIC is surely holding some flow up.

Nice curve, those numbers are pretty good for pump gas and your mods. That turbo is pretty sweet little upgrade.

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

3.5 ets widetank or ams? Lol prob won't be until winter anyways.. are you saying.flow restriction or heat soak problems... Or both with the.stocker ?

killerpenguin21

iTrader: (20)

the stock is probably just choking off the system at this point. ive had very good results with my ETS 3.5 and its the old style core. iw ouldnt waste money on an ams. the only other option i would consider is one that uses the garrett 3.8 core (cbrd/buschur?), or even ets can do that on request. but even their reg 3.5 on their new style core will do you wonders.

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

I've been dying for a cbrd due to the resembles stock unit. But I noticed the ets is extremely cost efficient especially with piping. I don't feel that way about the ams its 100 cheaper than cbrd, but doesn't take standard piping. Cbrd is what I will aim for based on the 3.8 core.. and stock fitting piping.

killerpenguin21

iTrader: (20)

personally i havent seen a major difference between the garrett and an ets 3.5, but i have read some interesting things. i run a 3.5 on the evo and i have an ets on my saab too, they are very good pieces for the cost imho. ive seen the ams be outperformed by cheaper options.

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

I will keep that in mind for sure.

Are you running SD on your evo ?

killerpenguin21

iTrader: (20)

no, too much of a hassle for me. i will never outgrow the maf, and im not on the hunt for every last whp. im already at the point of not having the ***** to do a pull to redline in 4th gear lol!

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

http://i696.photobucket.com/albums/v...2/IMAG0839.jpg

Muse fail

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

The o2.dump massive interfere with licp. Still things fit together with some love. Then hit the road, and the licp lost its perfect fit and it won't stay on get long in boost. So I will def be getting an aftermarket kit very soon.

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

Culprit of poor fitment being bent intercooler mounting and endtank..

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

My findings with a stock intercooler is that it stops flowing somewhere right around 385-390whp. Normally i have to hit it with 28+psi to get it make power in that range. Perhaps the 23psi is helping you out there. I would ditch the stock intercooler though.

aaron

211Ratsbud

iTrader: (1)

I'm on it looking for a cost effective solution:turbo xs, ets 3.0 " are both around 500 bones and judging my aby@mil.spec's testing the turbo xs would be fine for me... And we know the ets is good .. soon tho need more love from the government jobs lol..

I noticed there is a cap in power right around 400 -415ish on vd depending on day and such. Think that's the intercooler choking things up ?

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

I had a 3071 car on VP110/meth on the dyno awhile ago that made 393whp at 25psi and made 411whp at 32psi with the stock intercooler. It was a stock cam VIII which is why it was lower anyway that it should have been, but still 7psi for 18whp is not a good push. We have had E85 cars that I can pull the WG line on a stock turbo/stock intercooler and not make over 29psi or 390whp.