Dubstar112's HTA71, 3d SD.
I know, I installed it already, I was tooo anxious .. I will give them a cal Monday though. I doubt its going to hurt performance. I'm not even expecting a replacement either I guess Idk lol..
Yeah I'm pretty much sold on going for this turbo as well. It looks like it'll still be pretty nice on 91 (I may in general run 91 at the start of the year since the e85 prices will drastically increase
) but won't rip my block apart on occasional e85.
Not to mention how affordable it is!
) but won't rip my block apart on occasional e85.Not to mention how affordable it is!
I didn't see substantial gains installing my intercooler... But maybe due to conservation on my part ? Going to try and hook up ecu boost and get compensation to work as I've had no sucess with it before... Alt maps would be nice for kill mode
ive never tuned cams, but your running half the mid range numbers i run on stock cams. i would think you shouldnt have to cut it that much just for cams. also, i think you could pull a tad more fuel out.
Im running out of weather.. I need to get 400 ftlbs! No luck adding timing at peak boost though.. is my afr @ peak boost ?
Id expect my midrange to be a little flatter and have good gains 6k+ with cams though. Is this ?wrong ..
Id expect my midrange to be a little flatter and have good gains 6k+ with cams though. Is this ?wrong ..
id clean up that dip right before 4k, but i dunno how much difference it will make, i also have no idea how easy/feasible it is to smoothe it out with SD.
i dunno why, but my wide band reads a hell of a lot smoother than that.
i dunno why, but my wide band reads a hell of a lot smoother than that.
Its all in the log. I noticed when I'm logging many items, and the samples per/sec is less, the graph is relatively smoothed out. When I log the bare minimum, the graph seems to be more sketchy/accurate vs being smoothed out.







