Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.
View Poll Results: Which EMS do you think is the "best for the buck?"
AEM EMS
118
41.84%
Apex-I Power FC
8
2.84%
Apex-I S-AFC/II
10
3.55%
Autronics EMS
18
6.38%
Greddy E-Manage
9
3.19%
Turbo XS UTEC
35
12.41%
Vishnu XEDE
84
29.79%
Voters: 282. You may not vote on this poll

Favorite EMS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #91  
superz's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 878
Likes: 1
From: Westchester,NY
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
So what happens when low boost (23psi) creeps into or above the race gas portion of the map (@24psi) while still runing pump gas? Is the big step change (more advance and less fuel) and complete absence of tuning resolution above 24psi any cause for potential concern? I guess not...

There is theory and application. In the end, theory needs to comply with application and visa versa.

Shiv
Actually Shiv, I and Al made it a point to go very, very conservative on even race fuel. The timing is pure pump gas issue, and the air fuel ratios were also kept well under the racegas like 12.0+ . In other words, we could have squeezed out quite a bit more power out of her if we had true aggressive racegas timing and leaner 12.3 or 12.5:1 ratios, but I chose to keep a pump gas tune. Just the other night I ran 26psi on C16 mix and logged the wideband readings- all were perfectly well under 11.7:1. I got home and turned the boost down to 21psi and logged again-again they were perfect. I do understand that a full race tune might have netted another 25-30 whp pr more, but this was not the way we wanted to do things on my car.

Gil-superz
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 02:46 PM
  #92  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by superz
Actually Shiv, I and Al made it a point to go very, very conservative on even race fuel. The timing is pure pump gas issue, and the air fuel ratios were also kept well under the racegas like 12.0+ . In other words, we could have squeezed out quite a bit more power out of her if we had true aggressive racegas timing and leaner 12.3 or 12.5:1 ratios, but I chose to keep a pump gas tune. Just the other night I ran 26psi on C16 mix and logged the wideband readings- all were perfectly well under 11.7:1. I got home and turned the boost down to 21psi and logged again-again they were perfect. I do understand that a full race tune might have netted another 25-30 whp pr more, but this was not the way we wanted to do things on my car.

Gil-superz
Good points !

This tune was not a so called "dual stage" map

What we did was run all pump gas settings and it was tuned very conservativly so that it will be safe to run at any boost level

In fact - we tested it on the dyno starting at 21 psi and then working up in 1 - 1.5 psi steps all the way to 30 psi to verify that all settings were safe and functional

What other tuners may not realize is that we have worked around some of the issues with advanced code revisions

The results speak for themselves - a nice daily driving 521 whp Evo with all the driveability and functionality of the stock ecu and loads of Porsche Turbo beating performance on tap. The best part is that the cost is comparatively less than the other options - while doing a better job.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 02:04 AM
  #93  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
can't say i know much about xede, but i have used tuned w/ an aem ems.... and honestly, you never see any professional race teams use either in motorsports besides AEM themselves, and there's a reason for that.

What I do see a lot of is MoTeC, in all kinds of motorsports and Autronic on rally cars... For a lot of these people cost isn't really an issue, and this leads me to believe that MoTeC is the best, with rivals only being really exotic stuff like EFI technologies or Pectel.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 06:37 AM
  #94  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
A race car is purpose built/tuned to perform a specific purpose, over a short distance, in specific conditions, and only has to last until the end of the event. Conversely, a street-driven car is (usually) intended to perform a variety of functions efficiently, over many thousands of miles, in widely varying conditions, over a period of several years.

This being the case, that which is best suited for a race car is not always the best option for a street-driven car.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 12:58 PM
  #95  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
but the short distances are far harsher than what a street driven car sees. the best way to find out a car's weaknesses is to take it racing. if evo's were simply stock, your statement would hold 100% true, but the fact is many of the people on this board are bluring the lines between race car and street car.

there's a reason why mitsubishi uk chose the m800 to power their fq400. it's hard for me to believe that it runs anything less than perfect for the price they are charging on the car.

Motec products can idle 1600cc injectors w/ an air fuel of 14.7. the map is user scalable 20 x 40. each cylinder has its own timing and fuel map for cylinder balancing. theres a multitude of auxillary sensors you can use to do corrections.

the outputs are custom configurable to run a multitude of devices. it can ramp boost against many different sensors. it has two step abilities, that put aem's to shame. i could go on and on about this product, because it really is just that good. if you've never run/tuned it before, or have nothing to compare it against, you wouldn't understand.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 01:05 PM
  #96  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
That's great!


...but you don't need it.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #97  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
yea, but technically you don't need an EVO either, and that's never stopped anyone from wanting and buying one.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #98  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Well, that's true. I could just as easily have bought a Saturn and pocketed a good deal of money!

Nevertheless, I'm not one who's looking for more ways to throw money at it. This being the case, where making increases in power is concerned, it makes little sense to me to spend $1k or more for a device that I don't really need, when I could just as easily apply the same toward a nifty turbo kit.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #99  
groovytang's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
COMMENT REMOVED - OFF TOPIC

Last edited by Speedlimit; Nov 23, 2004 at 04:41 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #100  
groovytang's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
personally, i don't know why people jump to using aem ems when they usually don't have a good decent knowledge of tuning.....thats why most of them screw up their cars....a piggyback like xede is great for people who AREN'T professional tuners and can allow professionals like Shiv to tune their cars and not have to worry about driveability issues later on from tampering with a something that you aren't familar with......
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 02:58 PM
  #101  
Sentinal's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: OR, USA
AEM is the best product that can handle the most mods but I don't know if its the best bang for the buck for most people the Xede or UTEC would be totally sufficient and for about 1/2 the cost.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 03:48 PM
  #102  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
Originally Posted by groovytang
this thread is pretty interesting, but lol@ ordinary common novice car guys arguing with Shiv from Vishnu about ENGINE MANAGEMENT LOL, This guy is a real professional tuner who spends everyday tuning cars........he knows his stuff.........while these amateurs come on and try to argue about a point that they have no idea what their talking about...throwing a few ems terms around .....lol funny
i have 6 years of experience in efi, i've mapped from scratch motec, autronic, aem, speed pro, hondata.... my personal ride is pictured in "building tuning high performance electronic fuel injection" by ben strader in the "motec" section. I also build complete engine wire harnesses from scratch, and two of the street cars I've tuned have run 10's with trap speeds near 140 mph.

exede seems to work pretty well, but in the world of professional motorsports piggy back tuning/computers is at.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #103  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by EFIxMR
i have 6 years of experience in efi, i've mapped from scratch motec, autronic, aem, speed pro, hondata.... my personal ride is pictured in "building tuning high performance electronic fuel injection" by ben strader in the "motec" section. I also build complete engine wire harnesses from scratch, and two of the street cars I've tuned have run 10's with trap speeds near 140 mph.

exede seems to work pretty well, but in the world of professional motorsports piggy back tuning/computers is at.
That's great but it still doesn't get over the fact that stand alone ECUs, for the reasons mentioned, aren't the best choice for the majority of people who want a fast, reliable and flexible daily driver. If you want to dedicate your ride to the drag strip or road course, that is one thing. A well-mapped stand alone will fit the bill just fine. Especially if it lives off of a strict diet of c16. Having a full time ECU tuner on hand also helps. It becomes a whole different ball of wax when consumers are asked to make these compromises. Some are willing to do it. Others aren't. It's just important that consumers should be aware of their actual needs and requirments as well as what different systems are capable of providing with appropriate tuning.

Shiv
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 12:57 AM
  #104  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
While motec is my favorite engine management system, I agree that it isn't for everyone. For one thing it is expensive and it is complicated, so I apologize for that last statement.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 10:07 AM
  #105  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Missing a few. Why not put the flashes up in the poll and the HKS V Pro which is really a kick *** piece.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 PM.