Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Quick parts updates....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #271  
2k4EvoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: "Tri-Cities" WA
Hey guys well i have had the HKS 272/272 combo the Tomei 260 Procam combo and now the HKS 280/280 combo.

I wont go into my finding becouse i dont want to steal the thread. BUt here is a link to another thread of mine that i have made some videos showing the differences in vacuum and idle between these cams. For some reason the way cams are going to idle is a big part of someone's decision when they purchase cams so i figured i would start a thread showing how they sound.

David sorry if you feel i high jacked just thought maybe you would be interested also.

Chris

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...34#post1666334
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #272  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I have not tested any other cams than the HKS and the Crower.

Even with the stock turbo on the car the full line up of HKS cams, 264, 272 and 280's have shown significant gains. The turbo size means very little when choosing the cam.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
It will be interesting to see what all of the cronies say about the above statement... Since it seems everyone has been convinced the the sole deciding factor of cam choice is "turbo size". Seems everyone has forgotten how much "other variables" have to do with the big picture.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #273  
Corey's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, IN / Louisville KY
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I won't be putting the stock cams back in the car, that's for sure. I may drop back down to the 264's from the 280's and use some creative math to figure out the difference though.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com

It would be nice if you did test the 264's out being I won't be changing them out once I get the 20G slapped on my car.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #274  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
I know that going with 272's made a great improvement on my car on the stock turbo, and Dave has proven that you can get great results with the 280's on the stock turbo.... I think that you would see a BIGGER gain on a cam swap on a car that already has an upgraded turbo though..... this is where people missunderstand and think that the ONLY time you see a benefit with big cams is if you have an upgraded turbo.

Later,

Keith
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #275  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
Originally Posted by Zeus
It will be interesting to see what all of the cronies say about the above statement... Since it seems everyone has been convinced the the sole deciding factor of cam choice is "turbo size". Seems everyone has forgotten how much "other variables" have to do with the big picture.
i would seriously love to find out this is true and i guess i'm just waiting for it to be plopped down on the table with the bottom line and proof or justification to boot.

like... someone sayin'... i've tested this and this... the only downside to cams is idle... this is how you tune out idle probs this is how you tune out overlap probs with cam gears etc. and the boost still comes on the same... the torque is same or better on the entire curve.

i mean is that a whole lot of gaining without any giving up? i'd like to know for sure! cuz why spend the same money on 264 if you can get 280s... aside from lope.... which i'm a fan of. cuz what's the downside of the idle? is it so bad that you stall?

Last edited by trinydex; Feb 17, 2005 at 10:35 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 02:10 AM
  #276  
Corey's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 0
From: Jeffersonville, IN / Louisville KY
Originally Posted by trinydex
i mean is that a whole lot of gaining without any giving up? i'd like to know for sure! cuz why spend the same money on 264 if you can get 280s... aside from lope.... which i'm a fan of. cuz what's the downside of the idle? is it so bad that you stall?
The lopping gets annoying. Mine only does it every so often and I can't wait til it stops. I've got the "stock idle" flash from DynoFlash and it works nicely, but every so often it'll cam.

Stalling would get annoying as well. I'd hate to be driving a nice car just to have it stall in a parking lot in front of people and have to restart it again. It's happened to me a couple times. Seems to do it more when I'm in reverse. I'm not stalling it myself so I'm assuming it has something to do with the cams. TO each their own though.

I like having a stock idle so that no one really knows that I have cams, but that's just me.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 05:52 AM
  #277  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by trinydex
i would seriously love to find out this is true and i guess i'm just waiting for it to be plopped down on the table with the bottom line and proof or justification to boot.

like... someone sayin'... i've tested this and this... the only downside to cams is idle... this is how you tune out idle probs this is how you tune out overlap probs with cam gears etc. and the boost still comes on the same... the torque is same or better on the entire curve.

i mean is that a whole lot of gaining without any giving up? i'd like to know for sure! cuz why spend the same money on 264 if you can get 280s... aside from lope.... which i'm a fan of. cuz what's the downside of the idle? is it so bad that you stall?
I have dyno sheets posted (search for my user name as thread originator, and the word dyno) showing my car bone stock vs now including 272 HKS cams. For the entire rev range from 2000 RPM up to 8000 RPM I have more power than I had stock.

Keith
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #278  
mitsuorder's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (106)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by trinydex
i mean is that a whole lot of gaining without any giving up? i'd like to know for sure! cuz why spend the same money on 264 if you can get 280s... aside from lope.... which i'm a fan of. cuz what's the downside of the idle? is it so bad that you stall?
I like the way this man thinks
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #279  
HoLeeRay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: dirty jerz!
not to start any real trouble, but a friend gave a call to buschur and someone told him that you guys were scrapping the entire project? could you please shed some light on this? (project as in the 20g)

Last edited by HoLeeRay; Mar 1, 2005 at 08:28 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #280  
HoLeeRay's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: dirty jerz!
anyone?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #281  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
20G is on hold for a new wheel.

Last edited by umiami80; Mar 2, 2005 at 12:33 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #282  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The project is not dead. The wheels are still be produced but are going to be cast as they were intended to be in the first place.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #283  
ElAnCeR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
any updates as of yet? Still have hope for the 20g.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #284  
dryad001's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 1
From: Oak Creek, WI
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Thanks Keith for the trim job

Any of the HKS cams will work well with the 20g. I started the dyno testing out, found here on the forums, that I am doing to test all the combinations.


BTW, I haven't noticed any increase in lag ON THE DYNO with any of the cam swaps.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Wouldn't the lag get less and less as the duration of the cams increased. My understanding is the more air you push out thru the ext. manifold the more air hits the compressor wheel, right?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 08:05 AM
  #285  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The air, exhaust, would actually be hitting the turbine wheel, not the compressor.

Anyway, generally with a larger cam you loose some low end.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 AM.