Check Out My Custom Header and Turbo Install!
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick Ohio
Good point. I guess I just wanted something different. Unless we try new thingsI guess we cannot make progress. I will post the dyno #'s when I get them. It will be interesting.
Last edited by evoviiiyou; Jan 28, 2005 at 02:47 PM.
Originally Posted by evoviiiyou
Good point. I guess I just wanted something different. Unless we try new thingsI guess we cannot make progress. I will post the dyno #'s when I get them.
I wouldn't be too worried about Tym's design and implementation ideas as being "experimental". This is the same guy that made 821whp on a DSM WITHOUT nitrous.
I wouldn't be especially concerned about it. The nominally longer runners shouldn't really hamper peak power anyway. If anything, longer runners would soften the tip-in boost response, which obviously won't show up on a dyno sheet anyway.
very nice setup! As far as exhaust runner length on Subaru and the 4g63, I believe the stroke may play a factor in the spool up time, more so than the exhaust runner length... longer stroke on the 4g63, intake manifold design, cams, head design etc all play a roll.
92 x 75 mm wrx
85.0mm x 88.0mm evo
92 x 75 mm wrx
85.0mm x 88.0mm evo
No, the stroke length makes no difference where runner length is concerned. The overall displacement and int/exh head flow characteristics however affect optimum port/runner size.
Originally Posted by evo542
I think the concept is good, since heat rises - the exhaust gas velocity shouldn't drop too much
In actuality, whatever difference there may be in such an instance would probably not be something quantifiable on a dyno.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick Ohio
Anymore input on this set up so far:
Bennifits:heat evactuation (at speed), unnoticable exhaust velocity loss(turbo spool), looks good, top end power and marshmellow roasting
Negatives: inefficient tube material(slow down velocity of exhuast gas), not proven to produce added performance
Bennifits:heat evactuation (at speed), unnoticable exhaust velocity loss(turbo spool), looks good, top end power and marshmellow roasting
Negatives: inefficient tube material(slow down velocity of exhuast gas), not proven to produce added performance
I can't wait to see some of the cars Tyms shop puts out. He definately does some sick work.
We have a customer with a similar designed header. That collector in that picture looks like it is more efficient just by first impression than the one this local has.
We have a customer with a similar designed header. That collector in that picture looks like it is more efficient just by first impression than the one this local has.






