Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New Bolt in turbo... FP White Rabbit.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #901  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Zeus
I think a lot of people have a misconception though. They need to focus on the gains at the top end vs. "peak numbers". Granted, I expect to see people in the 345-380whp range once tuners figure out "what the turbo wants", but I'm not expecting grandiose peak numbers... however, I would be disappointed to see people get less than 40whp over an OE turbo at around 7500rpm with a flash... but wouldn't be surprised to see 75whp with other management as it has already been done with the EMS.

Zeus - where is the "misconception"?

Did you not see this dyno sheet - ???



Lets face facts square in the face. That is an insane amount of power for any evo with stock air box and no cams. In fact - its more power than I made on several Gt3037 equiped evos.

Going over 400 whp without cams means BIG power to me.

If you read last months Turbo Magazine you will see a dyno sheet of a fully equiped Stage 4 car with a Gt3076 and alcohol injection kit making similar numbers to what are being claimed in the above dyno sheet.

If they are claiming over 400 whp without cams them why should not people have expectataions of significant and real power gains ???

I am interested to see how the tuning goes this weekend with the other guys who bought this turbo.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #902  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
You will be hard pressed to find a lot of people willing to pay for this turbo that have not already dropped the coin for cams... granted, there are a few, but not many.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:44 PM
  #903  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Zeus
You will be hard pressed to find a lot of people willing to pay for this turbo that have not already dropped the coin for cams... granted, there are a few, but not many.
What does that mean?

To me either it can make 440 whp without cams or it cant

440 whp is a lot of power - not something you will trifle about

Cams or no cams - thats a huge gain over stock
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #904  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
The dyno sheet here looks very different

Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #905  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
so all these days and all this time and no one has real numbers?? I am lost.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #906  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
Exactly

Pump Gas, MBC, TBE, Flash, Air Intake - that's the numbers we need.
No Cams/Gears
No Alky
No MAF Delete

We need a "control" dyno.

The cars gonna have injectors and fuel pump (granted)
Well, this is what will be on my car when I get tuned next weekend:

91 octane
TBE
3" 02 housing
stock exhaust mani--ported/coated
aftermarket intercooler
XEDE
LIC pipe
NO CAMS
NO CAM GEARS
NO ALKY
STOCK AIR BOX w/ drop in and hard pipe to turbo

Hopefully that will be close enough of a flash comparo for some people.

Oh yeah, fuel pump and 680cc injectors
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:50 PM
  #907  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Zeus - where is the "misconception"?

Did you not see this dyno sheet - ???

Lets face facts square in the face. That is an insane amount of power for any evo with stock air box and no cams. In fact - its more power than I made on several Gt3037 equiped evos.

Going over 400 whp without cams means BIG power to me.

If you read last months Turbo Magazine you will see a dyno sheet of a fully equiped Stage 4 car with a Gt3076 and alcohol injection kit making similar numbers to what are being claimed in the above dyno sheet.

If they are claiming over 400 whp without cams them why should not people have expectataions of significant and real power gains ???

I am interested to see how the tuning goes this weekend with the other guys
who bought this turbo.
Of course I "saw" the dyno... Don't be ridiculous. I've been running the turbo for a while myself. However, people are screaming for pump gas flash numbers... those are EMS race gas dynojet numbers (the over 400whp), and I don't see people getting those numbers on a flash. Yes this is a 700cfm capable turbo, however, you have to really crank up the whick to see 400whp performace. There are no excuses here. I'm just putting things in perspective.

Are we on the same page now?
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #908  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Zeus
Of course I "saw" the dyno... Don't be ridiculous. I've been running the turbo for a while myself. However, people are screaming for pump gas flash numbers... those are EMS race gas dynojet numbers (the over 400whp), and I don't see people getting those numbers on a flash. Yes this is a 700cfm capable turbo, however, you have to really crank up the whick to see 400whp performace. There are no excuses here. I'm just putting things in perspective.

Are we on the same page now?
We are on the same page.

Just for the record - on cars with stock engines and typical mods - we usuallly see very slight gains with a stand alone system over the reflash. Nominal gains of 15 - 20 whp are the most you could expect in ideal situation through the elimination of the MAF snesor and more agressive timing.

I think the point I am making is if it can make 441 whp without cams and with a a stock intake - I would expect at least 475 whp with cams and a aftermarket cone filter. That is a LOT of whp with stock head and intake, TB, fmic etc etc.

I am expecting to see massive whp gains based upon the representations of the dyno sheet which has been claimed.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #909  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
it didn't make 441 with the stock intake, they pulled it off for that run.

and you think cams are worth 35whp? what cams? i haven't seen any net that.

and fwiw, i think 15-20whp is a pretty large amount.

I don't think anyone will see more than 450whp on this turbo on the same dyno(in its driven form-ie. air filter on). But we shall see!
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 03:23 PM
  #910  
Evol_VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
it didn't make 441 with the stock intake, they pulled it off for that run.
That is correct. It made 420whp with the stock intake and a 3" inlet pipe from the box to the turbo. Still a damn big number though.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #911  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
We are on the same page.

Just for the record - on cars with stock engines and typical mods - we usuallly see very slight gains with a stand alone system over the reflash. Nominal gains of 15 - 20 whp are the most you could expect in ideal situation through the elimination of the MAF snesor and more agressive timing.

I think the point I am making is if it can make 441 whp without cams and with a a stock intake - I would expect at least 475 whp with cams and a aftermarket cone filter. That is a LOT of whp with stock head and intake, TB, fmic etc etc.

I am expecting to see massive whp gains based upon the representations of the dyno sheet which has been claimed.
Oh, and I just thought you were being hard headed yet again...

I don't think you will be able to compare the tuning of this unit to the OE turbo. So I'd not be surprised to see flash tuners experience a "learning curve" with this unit. It really has a different dynamic of sorts. Remember, people screamed "snake oil" at your Dynoflash for quite some time (some still do ). So if you want to make an internet argument of it, I can use you for an example and probably use your own quotes (of when people said your tuning was full of SHlT) to prove my point. In this game 2+2 sometimes equals 4, and some times 5. The WR is an improvement over OE, and I'd bet the farm that Tym did not "inflate" his numbers as you seem to be insinuating.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #912  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Zeus
Oh, and I just thought you were being hard headed yet again...

I don't think you will be able to compare the tuning of this unit to the OE turbo. So I'd not be surprised to see flash tuners experience a "learning curve" with this unit. It really has a different dynamic of sorts. Remember, people screamed "snake oil" at your Dynoflash for quite some time (some still do ). So if you want to make an internet argument of it, I can use you for an example and probably use your own quotes (of when people said your tuning was full of SHlT) to prove my point. In this game 2+2 sometimes equals 4, and some times 5. The WR is an improvement over OE, and I'd bet the farm that Tym did not "inflate" his numbers as you seem to be insinuating.
I am not insinuating anything.

I got a phone call from another tuner who was asking questions about these 441 whp based upon what they were seeing. I am asking questions now myself as I am curious and need to know if this unit is good enough for a customer car I have here to tune.

I am as excited as the next evo community memeber if this turbo really can make 450 plus whp on a evo with basic mods. I think that would be great.

I am just trying to get to the bottom of this as it seems like something which I can not conceptualize. I have an open mind and I am excited to see the results.

As for my reflash and internet arguments, I dont see what if anything that has to do about the merrits of an aftermarket turbo. There are lots of idiots out there on the net who say a lot of stuipd things about a lot of subjects. Are you trying to say SHUT UP AL or I am going to slander your product ? I dont get it. Are you saying my reflash product is snake oil?

I am trying to have an inteligent conversation about a product which has great promise and which IMHO remains untested and unverified. I am excited to see the results and even more excited to tune and drive one soon so I can see for myself what all the buzz is about.

Last edited by DynoFlash; Jul 8, 2005 at 04:34 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #913  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
it didn't make 441 with the stock intake, they pulled it off for that run.

and you think cams are worth 35whp? what cams? i haven't seen any net that.

and fwiw, i think 15-20whp is a pretty large amount.

I don't think anyone will see more than 450whp on this turbo on the same dyno(in its driven form-ie. air filter on). But we shall see!
If they made 441 without cams with the limited mods posted above I would expect 470 with cams. Especially in the higher rpm range which this turbo appears to breath well in a good set of cams will yield significant gains.

On my 667 whp evo takeing the air filter off nets zero whp gains.

15 - 20 whp is a fairly large amount - - but its not 100 - 120 whp either
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 04:42 PM
  #914  
954DRGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Laud, FL
Al - Lets suppose this turbo makes only 30 to 40whp more than stock on pump and allows you to hold boost longer than a 10.5 equipped car.

Assuming one had Cams, Cam Gears, Exhaust, Fuel Mgmt etc - would you consider it a worthwhile mod for the money?
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #915  
anjapower's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Dirty Jersey
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
If they made 441 without cams with the limited mods posted above I would expect 470 with cams. Especially in the higher rpm range which this turbo appears to breath well in a good set of cams will yield significant gains.

On my 667 whp evo takeing the air filter off nets zero whp gains.

15 - 20 whp is a fairly large amount - - but its not 100 - 120 whp either
the numbers are on race gas. what's so hard to believe about 373whp on pump gas w/ AEM EMS? One of the dynos show that there's almost a 50whp gain up top. 373-50 = pretty damn close to what an 05 evo would make with 3" exhaust, boost controller and AEM EMS.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:58 PM.