Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New Bolt in turbo... FP White Rabbit.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 06:24 AM
  #886  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Originally Posted by Zeus
Works wonders for weight loss... errr, I mean detonation resistance
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #887  
1.8t's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, Ga
In for ecu reflash WR dyno's and or any independant dyno figures.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 08:31 AM
  #888  
EvoTio's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 2
From: L.A.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
If someone's not trying to get me to go with cams, they're trying to get me to install water injection


I have to pay for a reception and closing costs on a new place. That means no cams and no h20 injection for now. 91 is all I'm running...except for that 100 map
atlvalet, I'm suggesting it because it works! It's the only way to go if you want to get the best out of this crap 91 we have to use. I've used it for over 2 years on my Talon Tsi and now on the Evo. I would definitely do this before the cams. I'll be at Tuning Technoligies on Saturday the 16th getting tuned by Shiv if you want to check out my set up.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 10:30 AM
  #889  
Tym Switzer's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Quick update... I know that many of you are looking for numbers on pumpgas and alchohol or methanol injection. As soon as I get the opportunity, I'm going to finish installing the alcohol injection kit on the car and see what we can attain with it. I think this will be a better "real world" number for you guys to reference, since most of you are running this way as opposed to racegas. I am also going to throw one of our CDI COP Ignitions on the car so that I can open the gap on the plugs and prevent the higher rpm misfires I have seen while running the racegas boost levels on the stock ignition. I think that 400awhp/400awtq will be easily attainable with a conservative calibration.

I'll keep you posted. Thanks for watching.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 12:31 PM
  #890  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.

I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.

Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.

I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.

I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?

Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?

I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.

Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.

Last edited by DynoFlash; Jul 8, 2005 at 12:46 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #891  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Best would be a White Rabbited Evo on 93 octane- no Alky, no Cams, no Gears, no MAF delete. This is what the "most" of us run
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #892  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by EvoTio
atlvalet, I'm suggesting it because it works! It's the only way to go if you want to get the best out of this crap 91 we have to use. I've used it for over 2 years on my Talon Tsi and now on the Evo. I would definitely do this before the cams. I'll be at Tuning Technoligies on Saturday the 16th getting tuned by Shiv if you want to check out my set up.
Hey, I believe you...it's just that I can't swing anymore right now. Besides, I'm sure I'll be happy with what I have for a little while.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 12:59 PM
  #893  
EvoTio's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 2
From: L.A.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Hey, I believe you...it's just that I can't swing anymore right now. Besides, I'm sure I'll be happy with what I have for a little while.
I meant it as a suggestion, I didn't mean to preach . You'll love the way your car performs on 91. I'm going to be pretty tapped out myself after my clutch purchase, installation, and all the tuning and S.M.A.R.T. upgrade stuff.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #894  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.

I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.

Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.

I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.

I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?

Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?

I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.

Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
Im still in awe not 1 of these damn turbos has been on the dyno other than from a person who sells it.

I should be getting mine next week - and i am getting more skeptical of whether I want to put it on or not, just for the sole fact not 1 person here has had their car on the dyno with cams of this thing.

Switzer's dyno on pump w/o cams looked VERY promising, especially since I have cams, fmic, piping, etc. However, I just find it strikingly peculiar that there are STILL no dynos of this damn turbo from independent people. So much talk though! All I see on FP's turbo description is people's testimonies on "how good the turbo feels and how it looks stock, etc.". I dont care for that the slightest bit and I'm sure no one else does either. Show me some god damn numbers already ... SOMEONE! PLEASE!
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #895  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Well, you'll have to wait until next weekend in order to see numbers from the SoCal dyno day. I'm having my WR put on next week.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #896  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.

I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.

Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.

I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.

I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?

Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?

I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.

Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
There are somewhere between 8-10 being tuned this weekend through the next across the nation... I know at least four of those are being "street tuned" so it will be interesting to see what, and when any of these customers get dyno results. I think a lot of people have a misconception though. They need to focus on the gains at the top end vs. "peak numbers". Granted, I expect to see people in the 345-380whp range once tuners figure out "what the turbo wants", but I'm not expecting grandiose peak numbers... however, I would be disappointed to see people get less than 40whp over an OE turbo at around 7500rpm with a flash... but wouldn't be surprised to see 75whp with other management as it has already been done with the EMS.

Last edited by Zeus; Jul 8, 2005 at 01:43 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #897  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Well, you'll have to wait until next weekend in order to see numbers from the SoCal dyno day. I'm having my WR put on next week.

What are your current mods?
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #898  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.

I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.

Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.

I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.

I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?

Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?

I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.

Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Im still in awe not 1 of these damn turbos has been on the dyno other than from a person who sells it.

I should be getting mine next week - and i am getting more skeptical of whether I want to put it on or not, just for the sole fact not 1 person here has had their car on the dyno with cams of this thing.

Switzer's dyno on pump w/o cams looked VERY promising, especially since I have cams, fmic, piping, etc. However, I just find it strikingly peculiar that there are STILL no dynos of this damn turbo from independent people. So much talk though! All I see on FP's turbo description is people's testimonies on "how good the turbo feels and how it looks stock, etc.". I dont care for that the slightest bit and I'm sure no one else does either. Show me some god damn numbers already ... SOMEONE! PLEASE!
Here is a dyno from someone not selling the turbo. It made almost 30 hp max power over stock (with a boost leak) increasing to 50 hp at redline.

BTW, this is a very low reading dyno. Stock 03s are about 180 hp.
Originally Posted by tcarretti
Granted, you have to take a few things into account when reading this. The car was originally dynoed May 4th, 2005 at an ambient temperature of approximately 80 degrees.

With only one hour of tuning, a small boost leak that I think I have subsequently found and a whopping 100 degrees ambient temperature, here's what MZM was able to come up with:



There was only a net gain of 26.5 HP and 21.4 lbs TQ, but the boost was spiking at 23 and tapering down to 19.5. After getting the car home, cooling it off and doing some searching, I found the intercooler outlet junction to be a little loose. Tried to tighten it and the clamp stripped. Luckily I had an extra one laying around and replaced it. Now the car doesn't taper below 20.5 - 21 lbs.

If feels great! I went for a drive this morning on some new twisties that I found going out towards Medina Lake and the temperature outside was about 76 degrees. The car feels like a monster and I know that there's some more in there.

Hopefully Mark from TT will be able to massage the rest of it out of there as well as adding the alcohol injection power that's just waiting to be tuned for.

I wanted to give you an apples to apples comparision. Unfortunately, the boost leak does not make this absolutely accurate. At the very least you can see that spool is VERY close to stock but feels faster by the seat of your pants.

Thanks to everyone involved so far from installation to tuning. I have high hopes for this coming Saturday with Mark. Keeping my fingers crossed!

Tony

Last edited by robertrinaustin; Jul 8, 2005 at 02:07 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:21 PM
  #899  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Tony is on a Power FC though. I think People are really chopping at the bit for Reflash numbers. I really think Al would be one of the prime canadates to pull some real nice flash numbers...
Old Jul 8, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #900  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Exactly

Pump Gas, MBC, TBE, Flash, Air Intake - that's the numbers we need.
No Cams/Gears
No Alky
No MAF Delete

We need a "control" dyno.

The cars gonna have injectors and fuel pump (granted)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:00 PM.