New Bolt in turbo... FP White Rabbit.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
If someone's not trying to get me to go with cams, they're trying to get me to install water injection
I have to pay for a reception and closing costs on a new place. That means no cams and no h20 injection for now. 91 is all I'm running...except for that 100 map
I have to pay for a reception and closing costs on a new place. That means no cams and no h20 injection for now. 91 is all I'm running...except for that 100 map

Quick update... I know that many of you are looking for numbers on pumpgas and alchohol or methanol injection. As soon as I get the opportunity, I'm going to finish installing the alcohol injection kit on the car and see what we can attain with it. I think this will be a better "real world" number for you guys to reference, since most of you are running this way as opposed to racegas. I am also going to throw one of our CDI COP Ignitions on the car so that I can open the gap on the plugs and prevent the higher rpm misfires I have seen while running the racegas boost levels on the stock ignition. I think that 400awhp/400awtq will be easily attainable with a conservative calibration.
I'll keep you posted. Thanks for watching.
I'll keep you posted. Thanks for watching.
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
Last edited by DynoFlash; Jul 8, 2005 at 12:46 PM.
Originally Posted by EvoTio
atlvalet, I'm suggesting it because it works! It's the only way to go if you want to get the best out of this crap 91 we have to use. I've used it for over 2 years on my Talon Tsi and now on the Evo. I would definitely do this before the cams. I'll be at Tuning Technoligies on Saturday the 16th getting tuned by Shiv if you want to check out my set up.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Hey, I believe you...it's just that I can't swing anymore right now. Besides, I'm sure I'll be happy with what I have for a little while.
. You'll love the way your car performs on 91. I'm going to be pretty tapped out myself after my clutch purchase, installation, and all the tuning and S.M.A.R.T. upgrade stuff.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
I should be getting mine next week - and i am getting more skeptical of whether I want to put it on or not, just for the sole fact not 1 person here has had their car on the dyno with cams of this thing.
Switzer's dyno on pump w/o cams looked VERY promising, especially since I have cams, fmic, piping, etc. However, I just find it strikingly peculiar that there are STILL no dynos of this damn turbo from independent people. So much talk though! All I see on FP's turbo description is people's testimonies on "how good the turbo feels and how it looks stock, etc.". I dont care for that the slightest bit and I'm sure no one else does either. Show me some god damn numbers already ... SOMEONE! PLEASE!
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
Last edited by Zeus; Jul 8, 2005 at 01:43 PM.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Well, you'll have to wait until next weekend in order to see numbers from the SoCal dyno day. I'm having my WR put on next week.
What are your current mods?
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
There is no way I can find the time to read through 60 some odd pages of this thread - sorry but I have too many people complaining already that I don't have the time to answer emails.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
I am considering this WR turbo for a customer's car here at the shop which is going to be build for street use and I am holding back to make a purcahse for him till I can see some independant reviews.
Yesterday, I recieved a phone call from a well respected fellow tuner who was having trouble to even make more power than a stock turbo with this new WR unit. On pump gas they had reached 320 whp (25 psi) without cams or so they claimed. Clearly, either that particular car has some undiagnosed mechanical issues or tuning problems - or something is amiss here.
I am keeping an open mind here about the exciting prospects for this unit and wanted to get some additional data before I place an order.
I would like to ask if anyone out there has had a chance to obtain independant verfication of the kind of results which are being claimed on this turbo?
Has anyone taken one of these to a dyno yet ?
I am curious and I have not yet seen one show up at my shop.
Lets hear from some others and I am keeping my fingers crossed athat it realy can make 440 whp without cams which I find really amazing.
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Im still in awe not 1 of these damn turbos has been on the dyno other than from a person who sells it.
I should be getting mine next week - and i am getting more skeptical of whether I want to put it on or not, just for the sole fact not 1 person here has had their car on the dyno with cams of this thing.
Switzer's dyno on pump w/o cams looked VERY promising, especially since I have cams, fmic, piping, etc. However, I just find it strikingly peculiar that there are STILL no dynos of this damn turbo from independent people. So much talk though! All I see on FP's turbo description is people's testimonies on "how good the turbo feels and how it looks stock, etc.". I dont care for that the slightest bit and I'm sure no one else does either. Show me some god damn numbers already ... SOMEONE! PLEASE!
I should be getting mine next week - and i am getting more skeptical of whether I want to put it on or not, just for the sole fact not 1 person here has had their car on the dyno with cams of this thing.
Switzer's dyno on pump w/o cams looked VERY promising, especially since I have cams, fmic, piping, etc. However, I just find it strikingly peculiar that there are STILL no dynos of this damn turbo from independent people. So much talk though! All I see on FP's turbo description is people's testimonies on "how good the turbo feels and how it looks stock, etc.". I dont care for that the slightest bit and I'm sure no one else does either. Show me some god damn numbers already ... SOMEONE! PLEASE!
BTW, this is a very low reading dyno. Stock 03s are about 180 hp.
Originally Posted by tcarretti
Granted, you have to take a few things into account when reading this. The car was originally dynoed May 4th, 2005 at an ambient temperature of approximately 80 degrees.
With only one hour of tuning, a small boost leak that I think I have subsequently found and a whopping 100 degrees ambient temperature, here's what MZM was able to come up with:

There was only a net gain of 26.5 HP and 21.4 lbs TQ, but the boost was spiking at 23 and tapering down to 19.5. After getting the car home, cooling it off and doing some searching, I found the intercooler outlet junction to be a little loose. Tried to tighten it and the clamp stripped. Luckily I had an extra one laying around and replaced it. Now the car doesn't taper below 20.5 - 21 lbs.
If feels great! I went for a drive this morning on some new twisties that I found going out towards Medina Lake and the temperature outside was about 76 degrees. The car feels like a monster and I know that there's some more in there.
Hopefully Mark from TT will be able to massage the rest of it out of there as well as adding the alcohol injection power that's just waiting to be tuned for.
I wanted to give you an apples to apples comparision. Unfortunately, the boost leak does not make this absolutely accurate. At the very least you can see that spool is VERY close to stock but feels faster by the seat of your pants.
Thanks to everyone involved so far from installation to tuning. I have high hopes for this coming Saturday with Mark. Keeping my fingers crossed!
Tony
With only one hour of tuning, a small boost leak that I think I have subsequently found and a whopping 100 degrees ambient temperature, here's what MZM was able to come up with:
There was only a net gain of 26.5 HP and 21.4 lbs TQ, but the boost was spiking at 23 and tapering down to 19.5. After getting the car home, cooling it off and doing some searching, I found the intercooler outlet junction to be a little loose. Tried to tighten it and the clamp stripped. Luckily I had an extra one laying around and replaced it. Now the car doesn't taper below 20.5 - 21 lbs.
If feels great! I went for a drive this morning on some new twisties that I found going out towards Medina Lake and the temperature outside was about 76 degrees. The car feels like a monster and I know that there's some more in there.
Hopefully Mark from TT will be able to massage the rest of it out of there as well as adding the alcohol injection power that's just waiting to be tuned for.
I wanted to give you an apples to apples comparision. Unfortunately, the boost leak does not make this absolutely accurate. At the very least you can see that spool is VERY close to stock but feels faster by the seat of your pants.
Thanks to everyone involved so far from installation to tuning. I have high hopes for this coming Saturday with Mark. Keeping my fingers crossed!
Tony
Last edited by robertrinaustin; Jul 8, 2005 at 02:07 PM.
Tony is on a Power FC though. I think People are really chopping at the bit for Reflash numbers. I really think Al would be one of the prime canadates to pull some real nice flash numbers...
Exactly
Pump Gas, MBC, TBE, Flash, Air Intake - that's the numbers we need.
No Cams/Gears
No Alky
No MAF Delete
We need a "control" dyno.
The cars gonna have injectors and fuel pump (granted)
Pump Gas, MBC, TBE, Flash, Air Intake - that's the numbers we need.
No Cams/Gears
No Alky
No MAF Delete
We need a "control" dyno.
The cars gonna have injectors and fuel pump (granted)


