Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New Bolt in turbo... FP White Rabbit.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #1006  
titaniumkingpin's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 835
Likes: 1
can we slow down the pointless posts guys?
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:08 AM
  #1007  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
I'm still working on street tuning mine, but I have noticed that boost taper is less. I'm running around 21 psi and boost tapers about 1 psi with this turbo vs. 1.5-2 psi with the stocker. Since holding boost seems to be where this turbo makes power, I'm slowly working on upping the boost while adjusting timing to keep detonation in check. Slow process with the UTEC given how much time I have to street tune.
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:36 AM
  #1008  
Evol_VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
Well it seems everyone is saying the but dyno is reading higher but i want more real data. Going to have to wait till all the Vishnu guys get going next weekend.

The only thing that concerns me right now is the people talking about the boost tapering off. This Turbo is capable of "700CFM" and it cant hold 22psi? It is one thing if it is "spiking" and then holding out the back at a steady boost level but if it's hitting the desired boost level and falling all the way to redline that is not what I am looking for.
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:47 AM
  #1009  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (185)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
what does cfm have to do with how much boost it can make or hold?
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #1010  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
If this turbo cant hold at least 24psi at 7500, I think I will just put in the gt3076.
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #1011  
zstryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by WrX Kila
If this turbo cant hold at least 24psi at 7500, I think I will just put in the gt3076.
Remember that due to the turbo's different flow rates, how many psi it holds is not the end all "spec" to look at... just wait for some numbers and graphs.
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #1012  
Vapor's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Florida
boost and airflow are two different things, lets wait to see apples to apples comparison numbers
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #1013  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by WrX Kila
If this turbo cant hold at least 24psi at 7500, I think I will just put in the gt3076.
Hey Kila, I would look at the 35R if you don't get the rabbit. I've ridden in the same car with both turbos (35R and 3076R) and it is no comparison. You don't really gain anything in spool with the 3076 and you loose hp.
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:04 AM
  #1014  
David@Vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
what does cfm have to do with how much boost it can make or hold?
Or why is "Holding a specific pressure to redline" highly desireable?
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:06 AM
  #1015  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
I wonder how long it will take to see some actual dyno sheets?

In order to make 441 whp without cams - IMHO - it would have to reach at least 30 - 33 psi of boost on that turbo.

I guess more patience is in order
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #1016  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I wonder how long it will take to see some actual dyno sheets?

In order to make 441 whp without cams - IMHO - it would have to reach at least 30 - 33 psi of boost on that turbo.

I guess more patience is in order
I thought you were tuning some WRs?
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #1017  
Whoosh's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
I wonder who you're talking about? But yes, I would highly urge you to consider the GT35R over the 3076!
Originally Posted by robertrinaustin
Hey Kila, I would look at the 35R if you don't get the rabbit. I've ridden in the same car with both turbos (35R and 3076R) and it is no comparison. You don't really gain anything in spool with the 3076 and you loose hp.
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #1018  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by David@Vishnu
Or why is "Holding a specific pressure to redline" highly desireable?
Good point - especially if in more cases 20 psi is the most boost avisable to hold on pump gas. Which coincidentally is how much boost the stock turbos usually hold at the higher end of the power band.

Personally I do NOT care if the WR can make more power with MORE boost.

What I would like to see is it making MORE power on the SAME boost - e.g. 20 psi

Being able to hold a few more psi of boost and make a bit more power up top is not very helpful to those who run pump gas and who should not be running 23 or 24 psi.

In order to do a real meaningful test of this turbo vs. the stock one it would have to be done at the same boost levels.

Also - just to note that many stock turbos are capable of making a lot of boost. We have seen them reaching 30 psi of boost and 400 whp.
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #1019  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Whoosh
I wonder who you're talking about? But yes, I would highly urge you to consider the GT35R over the 3076!
Agreed the 3076 is not a good choice
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:13 AM
  #1020  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
Originally Posted by robertrinaustin
Hey Kila, I would look at the 35R if you don't get the rabbit. I've ridden in the same car with both turbos (35R and 3076R) and it is no comparison. You don't really gain anything in spool with the 3076 and you loose hp.
How so?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 PM.