Flashed White Rabbits: Please post your numbers Here!!
Originally Posted by johnjonfenomeno
So then how did they get 370 on pump?
Originally Posted by johnjonfenomeno
So then how did they get 370 on pump?
Agreed 
, but that doesn't help the ppl who already purchased and are hoping to see those results
, but that doesn't help the ppl who already purchased and are hoping to see those results
I have found myself of the bad end of that reality in life more than once. But that was mostly back when I was trying to make power with an NA Honda. 
Think if it was a 05 turbo 
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
The run#24 was from the first tune I did, I tuned first a pumpgas map and then a racegas map. So it took 24 runs to get there.
The run #13 is from same car new folder so they start at 1 again. So again since I had allready tuned this car before it took less time to get her dialed in. Only a few tweaks here and there on the map. Run #13 being the last one of the day on the new tune.
Edit: the original 16g turbo was totally stock, NO 10.5 hotside. It was a factory 2003 Evo turbo
The run #13 is from same car new folder so they start at 1 again. So again since I had allready tuned this car before it took less time to get her dialed in. Only a few tweaks here and there on the map. Run #13 being the last one of the day on the new tune.
Edit: the original 16g turbo was totally stock, NO 10.5 hotside. It was a factory 2003 Evo turbo
Originally Posted by johnjonfenomeno
Lets consolidate all the White rabbit numbers especially those on flash.
Please post your numbers here..
Post your mods, whp and the tuner.
Let me start
BTW this is my friends car
Cone filter
3" TBE
MBC
660 Injectors
255 lph pump
TurboTrix ... 312 awhp
DynoFlash ... 280 awhp
becoming more like a white tortoise
Please post your numbers here..
Post your mods, whp and the tuner.
Let me start
BTW this is my friends car
Cone filter
3" TBE
MBC
660 Injectors
255 lph pump
TurboTrix ... 312 awhp
DynoFlash ... 280 awhp
becoming more like a white tortoise
Originally Posted by sleet
^ What kind of dyno are those numbers on? Cars make that much power with those mods without a new turbo easy.
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
No we are now using Cialis here... but it just doens't seem to have the same affect. LOL
Whenever you get a chance pust up my sheet so people can see how much Torque you got me on your Dyno. SO people can compare the TME to that car on the runs yu posted.
Originally Posted by VTECH8TR
Doug,
Whenever you get a chance pust up my sheet so people can see how much Torque you got me on your Dyno. SO people can compare the TME to that car on the runs yu posted.
Whenever you get a chance pust up my sheet so people can see how much Torque you got me on your Dyno. SO people can compare the TME to that car on the runs yu posted.
Originally Posted by VTECH8TR
Doug,
Whenever you get a chance pust up my sheet so people can see how much Torque you got me on your Dyno. SO people can compare the TME to that car on the runs yu posted.
Whenever you get a chance pust up my sheet so people can see how much Torque you got me on your Dyno. SO people can compare the TME to that car on the runs yu posted.
I _LOVE_ my TME too.
Together with the Ebay/SSa header, I made 21whp from bolt on and tuning. That's more than I made with my cams! It also bears mentioning that even with a header the TME is still cheaper than the WR by a good chunk.I still think that more Whirte Rabbit results will be a great thing. The more we know and greater number of cars in the pool of comparison, the better.
Originally Posted by Noize
Its not a mapping problem.
What Doug provided us with is total independent testing on a car that he tuned before (16G) and after (WR). There certainly isn't anything wrong with his tune. He has no agenda in posting his results, just education for the evoM community.
In my opinion, his post deserves major praise, because he just saved a lot of people $1500.
What Doug provided us with is total independent testing on a car that he tuned before (16G) and after (WR). There certainly isn't anything wrong with his tune. He has no agenda in posting his results, just education for the evoM community.
In my opinion, his post deserves major praise, because he just saved a lot of people $1500.
I was expecting modest but tangible gains from the WR - but less than the obviously misleading 441 whp claimed
Its shocking to see that the WR actually looses power in the lower end of the power band
The WR was certainly not making any extra power on the car we had on our dyno yesterday
I guess the moral to this story for me is that some shocking outlandish whp claim is meaningless unless its back up with data, and A- B testing in a controlled situation as a before and after.
Last edited by DynoFlash; Jul 15, 2005 at 10:20 PM.
Originally Posted by Noize
I _LOVE_ my TME too. Together with the Ebay/SSa header, I made 21whp from bolt on and tuning. That's more than I made with my cams! It also bears mentioning that even with a header the TME is still cheaper than the WR by a good chunk.
I still think that more Whirte Rabbit results will be a great thing. The more we know and greater number of cars in the pool of comparison, the better.
Together with the Ebay/SSa header, I made 21whp from bolt on and tuning. That's more than I made with my cams! It also bears mentioning that even with a header the TME is still cheaper than the WR by a good chunk.I still think that more Whirte Rabbit results will be a great thing. The more we know and greater number of cars in the pool of comparison, the better.
