Pounding the White Rabbit
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
So, uh, you went from a 12.2 to an 11.0 by just switching from a TME to a WR? I'm using 12.2 as a guess, since that is what I run on a turbo similar to the TME with only minimal supporting mods...
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
The only toxic polution is the crap between your ears.
I will be at Pruven tomrorow when I can print the same pulls SAE corrected
Your assertions are both misleading and false
I will be at Pruven tomrorow when I can print the same pulls SAE corrected
Your assertions are both misleading and false
I've tried to keep this discourse civil and factual, but yet again, you're taking it entirely too personal and resorting to insults because I have you on the defensive. Good ol' Al.
Misleading, in this case, would be posting up dyno charts 6 months apart and claiming that one product is garbage just because you personally can't resell it. I'm only posting up factual information backed by research and data. Feel free to check my sources and even come up with your own. I welcome it.
Disprove me and I'll go back from whence I came. Part of the reason why you're getting so bent out of shape is because you know I'm right and can't prove otherwise.
Best regards,
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I will be at Pruven tomrorow when I can print the same pulls SAE corrected
What some people fail to see here is the fact that the WR is a direct competitor for the 20g. Inevitably some tuners will support the WR, some will not. You can draw your own conclusions from there.
Originally Posted by BADWRX
Uh dude, I am pretty sure he is talking about a real track, as in a road course. Not a 1/4 mile stretch of asphalt.
Originally Posted by emperor_gp
What some people fail to see here is the fact that the WR is a direct competitor for the 20g. Inevitably some tuners will support the WR, some will not. You can draw your own conclusions from there.
So stop the bashing of customers/vendors and give us some real results.
What would be really great to see is the EVO with the WR that was tuned and dyno'ed at Switzer get dynoed at Bushur or Pruven. If the results are repeatable or at least close (considering the differences in dynos) then it would put all of this to rest.
Don't you all agree?
Don't you all agree?
Originally Posted by mike 99gsx
So what did you actually run?
Now i need to work on my brakes... I'll be in the 1'22's soon!
If anyone has ever run MSR, they should know that 1'23.8 is fast!
My car is the ultimate response machine!
2.3l with the FPWR! I get full boost at 2,300rpm... This is a killer set up for street and track! I love it!
COmpare to the TME, thcar spools quicker and now I hold boost to 7,800rpm...
I would love for a local tuner to set up a EVO day at MSR!!!!!
2.3l with the FPWR! I get full boost at 2,300rpm... This is a killer set up for street and track! I love it!
COmpare to the TME, thcar spools quicker and now I hold boost to 7,800rpm...
I would love for a local tuner to set up a EVO day at MSR!!!!!
Originally Posted by JoizeeX
have u had the chance to run it on a road course or some twisty roads? how do u like the response of the car when only the turbo is changed? compared to stock/TME...what rpm's do u feel the torque's coming on strong? if u've seen my previous posts, i'm interested in eventually tuning my evo to be the "ultimate response machine" so-to-speak
so i'm curious about turbos that offer some power improvement in balance with quick spool.
thanks
so i'm curious about turbos that offer some power improvement in balance with quick spool.thanks
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
If there is a 50F difference in ambient temps between the two tests, comparing uncorrected runs is downright stupid. The WR run could be understated by as much as 3-5% while the TME could be overstated by 3-5%. If this is the case, the tables would suddenly turn.



Can you say Spin???