Update..515 whp/362 ft bls, 93 octane alone........
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Quite frankly, not directed at you Andy, but FU** a Dynojet. I'm tired of hearing about their over inflated flywheel HP readings.
Doesn't AMS tune on a Dynojet? Don't they currently have the fastest 1/4 mile trap and the fastest ET for a US Evolution? I mean I know the Dynojet has the highest numbers, but some of the fastest cars use them including Al.
Originally Posted by High_PSI
Doesn't AMS tune on a Dynojet? Don't they currently have the fastest 1/4 mile trap and the fastest ET for a US Evolution? I mean I know the Dynojet has the highest numbers, but some of the fastest cars use them including Al.
btw, great numbers with this turbokit Dave. now i have thoughts of purchasing this kit from ya instead.....
Last edited by freshevo8; Aug 3, 2006 at 01:21 PM.
I think Dave (along with a lot of us) = sick of comparing numbers between both dynos. Numbers on the BR dyno are low enough to make you cry.. this is why it's always brought up 
Evolved Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 1
From: MA
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
That is a very interesting power curve. Perfectly suited for a FWD car. The numbers are impressive but a bit deceiving at the same time. The power under the curve is not what it should be. Looks like you found the secret to big pump gas numbers. I hope these results dont make people ditch their plans for a nice 2.3/35r combo.
you can't be serious... just because youre used to looking Evo Dyno's where you can clearly see where the head, cams, and turbo quickly run out of efficiency and take a nose dive with the torque curve? This is a perfect example of what any Dyno should look like with out those flaws.
This whole area under the curve thing is misleading, Peak Torque is way ovverrated, when you're accelerating your only using the top few hundred rpm of the torque curve. This car will be fast...
I dont know if some people realize how insanely impressive this feat is. Dave Buschur is an AEM grand master as far as Im concerned. This car would probably make close to 600whp on a dynojet..... on 93 octane. That is so so bad-***. Im done now.
im sorry, but i've had alot of experience with this turbo on my personal evo being that we were the first to develop a kit based upon this combination of wheels and housings. in fact, we released this turbo in a non-bb form over 3 years ago (TO4R "big kahuna") i've tried multiple manifold designs with this same turbo on 91, 93 and 109 octane. i find it hard to beleive that this # was acheived on such low boost with such low octane.
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
I don't think there is any need to question Dave. If he just posted the numbers and nothing else, I would have still belived him as long as it is posted by Dave.
The dyno sheets pretty much tells you everything. When someone goes out there and runs 11s, all they need to post is their time sheet, mods and gas. Same for the turbo kit tests imo. Specify the turbo, the type of gas, whether alcohol is used or not, boost level, type of dyno and the mods on the car. Nothing more needed. The car they dyno'ed is not even their shop car, their customer's car.
Not all GT35Rs are the same (the turbo itself). I think the same thing applies to T67 as well.
The dyno sheets pretty much tells you everything. When someone goes out there and runs 11s, all they need to post is their time sheet, mods and gas. Same for the turbo kit tests imo. Specify the turbo, the type of gas, whether alcohol is used or not, boost level, type of dyno and the mods on the car. Nothing more needed. The car they dyno'ed is not even their shop car, their customer's car.
Not all GT35Rs are the same (the turbo itself). I think the same thing applies to T67 as well.
Last edited by memo3; Aug 3, 2006 at 03:05 PM.
Originally Posted by PeakBoost
im sorry, but i've had alot of experience with this turbo on my personal evo being that we were the first to develop a kit based upon this combination of wheels and housings. in fact, we released this turbo in a non-bb form over 3 years ago (TO4R "big kahuna") i've tried multiple manifold designs with this same turbo on 91, 93 and 109 octane. i find it hard to beleive that this # was acheived on such low boost with such low octane.
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
not to mention his signature of fast @ss cars. it would prolly be safe to say the guy knows what he's doin 
Last edited by freshevo8; Aug 3, 2006 at 03:08 PM.
:
Evolving Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: akrun, ohio
Originally Posted by PeakBoost
im sorry, but i've had alot of experience with this turbo on my personal evo being that we were the first to develop a kit based upon this combination of wheels and housings. in fact, we released this turbo in a non-bb form over 3 years ago (TO4R "big kahuna") i've tried multiple manifold designs with this same turbo on 91, 93 and 109 octane. i find it hard to beleive that this # was acheived on such low boost with such low octane.
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
This is hard to believe. The car is making about 200 WHP more than any other GREAT 2.3 stroker, big turbo Evo using the same octane and boost level. How is that possible? A sudden magic jump of 50%. It's almost equivalent to someone taking delivery of a new Evo 9 and then dynoing at over 450 WHP after just a TBE and a tune.
Originally Posted by PeakBoost
im sorry, but i've had alot of experience with this turbo on my personal evo being that we were the first to develop a kit based upon this combination of wheels and housings. in fact, we released this turbo in a non-bb form over 3 years ago (TO4R "big kahuna") i've tried multiple manifold designs with this same turbo on 91, 93 and 109 octane. i find it hard to beleive that this # was acheived on such low boost with such low octane.
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
no offense and nothing personal, i respect dave buschur for his accomplishments in this industry.
i just find this more than hard to beleive and am curious as to why someone has yet to question these "findings"...
what was the final advance?
do you have any logs available dave?
Wow man I can't believe you posted this. You actually think Dave Buschur would make these #'s up. Come on man get real
. If you couldn't do it , it doesn't mean someone else couldn't do it. Bottom line is Dave is the Real deal. He eats, ****s, and sleeps the 4G63
. I have been a loyal Buschur customer for 10 years, and he is the only one Tuner shop that makes parts, tests parts, and then gives us all the information for FREE.
