Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Technical Head Question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #1  
Spooldyou's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
From: Boston,MA
Technical Head Question...

Ok guys, Im working on the head and im getting around to CCing the Combustion chamber, the volume on the Chambers suppoerd to be 43CC's I have 44.5cc's per combustion chamber.So that means that the compression is going to be lower than what i though.with all the math we have done, we figured the compression to be at 8.5:1. We need to bring it back up to around 8.7: 1.


The guestion would be -----How much do we mill the head to loose 1.5 cc's per chamber? That way I can tell the guy at the machine shop how much to mill the head.



Thanks in advance.

Anthony
Boost Solutions
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 01:57 AM
  #2  
Spooldyou's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
From: Boston,MA
Riiigghhhttt Thanks Guys !
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #3  
noahrexion's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: AZ
To get mm you multiply by 0.999972.
1.5 x " " = 1.499958 mm

If you scrube that off the entirety of the head you will effectively loose 1.499958mm's (I would tell the machinist 1.5mm) meaning 1.5cc's per cylinder/combustion chamber.

Just make sure you takin into account when figureing your static CR the head gasket you will be using, your deck height and piston top clearance. GL!
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #4  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
You can look up the term "dynamic compression" to gain an understanding. I will note there really isn't such a thing as dynamic compression from what I have read, but it gives you a perspective on compression and boost. Basically, a lower compression motor at higher boost will make more power than a high compression motor at lower boost at an equivalent "dynamic compression."

My personal opinion is that it will make no difference.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
4ringturncoat's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: MI
I would try giving somebody like BR, AMS, or Cosworth a call to see if they have figures for you. I know back in the old days when I would CC a hemi head the good head shops would know how much needs to be taken off to get the cc volume were it had to be.

Problem is the head is not a nice little square or cylinder so trying to figure the volume of a odd shape with tapered walls is going to be almost impossible to do.

Do you have to have 8.7? As 240 said with a turbo car there is a lot of give in and take with cr vs. boost. Problem with running lower cr is it will induce a little more lag and less torque in off boost driving situations but it will allow you to run more boost. Why venture away from 9.0, if your at 8.5 now did you order lower compression pistions?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #6  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Originally Posted by noahrexion
To get mm you multiply by 0.999972.
1.5 x " " = 1.499958 mm

If you scrube that off the entirety of the head you will effectively loose 1.499958mm's (I would tell the machinist 1.5mm) meaning 1.5cc's per cylinder/combustion chamber.

Just make sure you takin into account when figureing your static CR the head gasket you will be using, your deck height and piston top clearance. GL!
^ DO NOT TAKE 0.060" off your cylinder head.

Now i havent measured or milled a evo head & re-cc'd it, however on smaller bore engines that i used to tweak, ~20 years ago, my rule of thumb was to reduce a combustion chamber volume by 1cc, I would mill 0.008" or 0.20 mm off the head.

Now, you can go on-line, located a compression ratio calculator, plug in all the numbers & change your haed gasket thickness accordingly to how this will effect your clearance volume.

dont take 1.5mm off your cylinder head unless you want to increase your compression by about 1 point
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 11:22 AM
  #7  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Spooldyou
We need to bring it back up to around 8.7: 1.

One question:

Why would you need to, or even want to? This makes little sense, and is certainly not worth the trouble or expense. IMO, it's actually moving in the wrong direction.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #8  
Spooldyou's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
From: Boston,MA
Originally Posted by Ted B
One question:

Why would you need to, or even want to? This makes little sense, and is certainly not worth the trouble or expense. IMO, it's actually moving in the wrong direction.
why is it moving in the wrong direction? I dont get it


the head had to be decked ways to match the gasket, and the block, its wasnt perfect. AND it was already decked .12 i believe.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 04:57 PM
  #9  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Let me ask it another way . . .

What do you feel you will gain by going through the trouble and expense to do this?

. . . I am referring to an effort to raise the compression 0.2 points.

Last edited by Ted B; Feb 17, 2007 at 05:10 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #10  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Are you only ccing the chambers and milling the head? Or, has cylinder bore and/or stroke been changed as well? Are you using overbore pistons?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 05:33 PM
  #11  
Frenchy4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
There's not going to be any noticable difference between 8.5:1 and 8.7:1. It's really not worth the trouble. If anything you can run a tad more boost with the lower ratio..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DSPORT
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
0
Oct 13, 2015 01:41 PM
PharmEcis
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
28
Feb 29, 2012 10:32 AM
sabastian458
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
16
Jan 4, 2009 09:00 AM
liquid_toast
04-06 Ralliart Engine/Drivetrain
27
May 19, 2007 12:11 AM
thatsMR2u
ECU Flash
8
Jul 2, 2006 05:08 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 AM.