Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

My buschur racing pump gas evo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #211  
Planet Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by alpha;
If the intercooler is too small for the boost pressure / flow / compressor outlet temps. Sure. I have seen it first hand. ONCE. Seen it happen to someone else. ONCE. Again. If it's too small. Rarely happens though



Could it not happen say tuning a car from 8lbs to 30lbs. Car has been ran a lot with minimal cool down time. Intercooler is too small for the boost pressure / flow / compressor outlet temps. Quoting Tony Palo (T1). Though this might not be the case with Dave. I dont know. It's about the cross sectional area available for hot flow (height x depth). That's where pressure drop happens. I hate to use the straw analogy, but try to shove 85lbs/min of air though a straw. You can only fit so much efficiently, so you end up with more pressure at the inlet side than what makes it though the "ic" and you now have pressure drop. When you use an intercooler way past what it was designed for, it's not only the temperature increase, it's the pressure drop that you get. That's why it's always better to go taller and thicker on a core, not longer. You don't want to go too thick either, or you risk not getting enough air flow through the core, for cooling. This would explain the ait's being a little high and the pressure drop we were getting
Alpha, I think that we are talking about two completely different things. You are bringing up intercooling theory. Even though many points you make are quite textbook in nature, the post I was referencing has to do with terminology and accuracy.
If you reread what was typed, you will see that was was stated makes absolutely NO SENSE. Trust me and reread the sentence.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #212  
kreionic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
From: MD/ NY
I just dont understand why people can not believe this. First let me start out by saying I have 0 Buschur parts on my car. I have never purchased anything from them. Me for example. I am running about 26 psi on 93 octane on the stock ecu. Its all about the tune. I will gladly post logs of my car without my timing or AFRs. I have no knock at all. Just a random 1 in 1 or 2 spots but never the same spot in multiple logs.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 11:02 AM
  #213  
alpha's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Planet Evo
Alpha, I think that we are talking about two completely different things. You are bringing up intercooling theory. Even though many points you make are quite textbook in nature, the post I was referencing has to do with terminology and accuracy.
If you reread what was typed, you will see that was was stated makes absolutely NO SENSE. Trust me and reread the sentence.
Agreed. I should have (and will try before I leave) read through the whole thread instead of one page
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #214  
Planet Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kreionic;
I just dont understand why people can not believe this. First let me start out by saying I have 0 Buschur parts on my car. I have never purchased anything from them. Me for example. I am running about 26 psi on 93 octane on the stock ecu. Its all about the tune. I will gladly post logs of my car without my timing or AFRs. I have no knock at all. Just a random 1 in 1 or 2 spots but never the same spot in multiple logs.
There is a big difference between, 26psi and say 400- 450HP and 525+ at 28psi on a GT35r and pump gas.
Its not always about boost pressure. Way too many things are being overlooked in this thread. Boost Pressure is a mere formality at this point.
Pump gas numbers of this sort actually are believable...its just that this is another thread about ONE specific car that magically can not detonate because it has BR all over it.
The amount of cylinder pressure needed to develop this kind of high rpm output is astounding for a 2.0l engine. My question is what RPM is this engine being revved to?

Last edited by Planet Evo; Jul 7, 2007 at 11:23 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #215  
kreionic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
From: MD/ NY
Originally Posted by Planet Evo
There is a big difference between, 26psi and say 400- 450HP and 525+ at 28psi on a GT35r and pump gas.
Its not always about boost pressure. Way too many things are being overlooked in this thread. Boost Pressure is a mere formality at this point.
Pump gas numbers of this sort actually are believable...its just that this is another thread about ONE specific car that magically can not detonate because it has BR all over it.
The amount of cylinder pressure needed to develop this kind of high rpm output is astounding for a 2.0l engine. My question is what RPM is this engine being revved to?
Very true. I agree 100%.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 11:45 AM
  #216  
Darwinian's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Obviously this is an excellent car with a fantastic driver. Nice work.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #217  
SIGSP2340's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Good job Trent, Dave and the rest of the Buschur team.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #218  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
Originally Posted by Planet Evo
There is a big difference between, 26psi and say 400- 450HP and 525+ at 28psi on a GT35r and pump gas.
Its not always about boost pressure. Way too many things are being overlooked in this thread. Boost Pressure is a mere formality at this point.
Pump gas numbers of this sort actually are believable...its just that this is another thread about ONE specific car that magically can not detonate because it has BR all over it.
The amount of cylinder pressure needed to develop this kind of high rpm output is astounding for a 2.0l engine. My question is what RPM is this engine being revved to?
Buschur has done this repeatedly not 525whp, but high 400's. You can sit here and scratch your head as to why other tuners don't put out those numbers regularly or you can concede that Buschur builds awesome cars and those awesome cars use primarily Buschur parts. I don't know what else to say you obviously don't like Buschur. It's in the details unfortunately.... I firmly believe that, but your right boost pressure is just a measure of resistance it's just a number.

Last edited by Jasil; Jul 7, 2007 at 07:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 07:52 AM
  #219  
IHUNTV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: akrun, ohio
Originally Posted by Planet Evo
There is a big difference between, 26psi and say 400- 450HP and 525+ at 28psi on a GT35r and pump gas.
Its not always about boost pressure. Way too many things are being overlooked in this thread. Boost Pressure is a mere formality at this point.
Pump gas numbers of this sort actually are believable...its just that this is another thread about ONE specific car that magically can not detonate because it has BR all over it.
The amount of cylinder pressure needed to develop this kind of high rpm output is astounding for a 2.0l engine. My question is what RPM is this engine being revved to?


i will post up the dyno sheet, in a bit. RPM was to 7500 when it made 525, and it was still climbing. I shift at 7800-8000 at the track.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 09:08 AM
  #220  
IHUNTV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: akrun, ohio









Last edited by IHUNTV8; Jul 8, 2007 at 09:26 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 09:26 AM
  #221  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Interesting torque curve. What are you using for boost control?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 09:28 AM
  #222  
IHUNTV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: akrun, ohio
Buschur

Torque is over rated

Last edited by IHUNTV8; Jul 8, 2007 at 09:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #223  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by IHUNTV8
Buschur

Torque is over rated
Yeah when you dont have it!
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #224  
SIGSP2340's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
Interesting torque curve. What are you using for boost control?
I am gonna take a guess and say he is using the AEM. I remember Dave saying that the AEM boost control holds pretty solid.

Trent, correct me if I am wrong.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #225  
IHUNTV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: akrun, ohio
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
Yeah when you dont have it!

Dont need it 135 mph in the quarter says it all....How much torque does your rig make?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:45 PM.