My buschur racing pump gas evo
Please go ahead and break it real world results always trump feeble attempts at being book smart.
I knew you were going to be one of these idiotic technicality people......are you sure it was "Intake" temps.....go away and don't come back. You know exactly what happened the sensor is placed after the oultet of the IC one intercooler showed 7 degrees of temp. increase the othe showed 49 degrees stop doing a play on words. This is simple no reason to attempt to mix words and complicate things.
You've got to be kidding me, I cant believe your even trying to make a stand here.
Both cars have AEM AIT sensors located on the upper intercooler pipe. Did David or I say anything about CFM's rating or pressure drop? I dont think we did?
Unless AIT stands for something other then AIR INTAKE TEMP then I believe what i saw was AIR INTAKE TEMPERATURE. The beginning of the log shows 101 degrees. By 9k rpm, the temp is 149 degrees. What is so hard to comprehend about that?
Both cars have AEM AIT sensors located on the upper intercooler pipe. Did David or I say anything about CFM's rating or pressure drop? I dont think we did?
Unless AIT stands for something other then AIR INTAKE TEMP then I believe what i saw was AIR INTAKE TEMPERATURE. The beginning of the log shows 101 degrees. By 9k rpm, the temp is 149 degrees. What is so hard to comprehend about that?
I'll be grammatically correct when you learn how to spell.....Patience no Patients and Capital not Capitol........are you a teenager thats playing smart guy?
Originally Posted by Steve@NoLimitmotors;
You've got to be kidding me, I cant believe your even trying to make a stand here.
Both cars have AEM AIT sensors located on the upper intercooler pipe. Did David or I say anything about CFM's rating or pressure drop? I dont think we did?
Unless AIT stands for something other then AIR INTAKE TEMP then I believe what i saw was AIR INTAKE TEMPERATURE. The beginning of the log shows 101 degrees. By 9k rpm, the temp is 149 degrees. What is so hard to comprehend about that?
Both cars have AEM AIT sensors located on the upper intercooler pipe. Did David or I say anything about CFM's rating or pressure drop? I dont think we did?
Unless AIT stands for something other then AIR INTAKE TEMP then I believe what i saw was AIR INTAKE TEMPERATURE. The beginning of the log shows 101 degrees. By 9k rpm, the temp is 149 degrees. What is so hard to comprehend about that?
There is a difference between charge temps and intake temps. Learn it and understand it.
The problem is that when "the worlds" best tuner can seem to word and or give all the information out on a particular subject it is biased. He did happen however to jab at another vendors product without any ill will though ...huh?
Anyway not to stray, have you EVER seen CHARGE TEMPS decrease during a 9000 rpm pull?
How much boost was being run? How far apart were the dyno runs?
You know it really doesn't matter because you are filled with misinformation and anger you won't have a logical conversation.
Don't go on an internet forum and spread half truths to increase business. Tell the whole story and give some theoretical and practical information to back your findings. When you come off with posts, like what we are debating right now, that are incomplete, people will infer that everyone elses products are inferior.
It is unfair and untruthful.
Nobody says or does anything about it thats why it is accepted on this forum. When someone does they are persecuted. Find someone or something else to defend because you just look like a salesman without any clue what you are doing or selling. Take it how you want "steve" its what I see.
Notice I said we all forget how to spell sometimes. But you must have missed that.
Well believe it.
There is a difference between charge temps and intake temps. Learn it and understand it.
The problem is that when "the worlds" best tuner can seem to word and or give all the information out on a particular subject it is biased. He did happen however to jab at another vendors product without any ill will though ...huh?
Anyway not to stray, have you EVER seen CHARGE TEMPS decrease during a 9000 rpm pull?
How much boost was being run? How far apart were the dyno runs?
You know it really doesn't matter because you are filled with misinformation and anger you won't have a logical conversation.
Don't go on an internet forum and spread half truths to increase business. Tell the whole story and give some theoretical and practical information to back your findings. When you come off with posts, like what we are debating right now, that are incomplete, people will infer that everyone elses products are inferior.
It is unfair and untruthful.
Nobody says or does anything about it thats why it is accepted on this forum. When someone does they are persecuted. Find someone or something else to defend because you just look like a salesman without any clue what you are doing or selling. Take it how you want "steve" its what I see.
There is a difference between charge temps and intake temps. Learn it and understand it.
The problem is that when "the worlds" best tuner can seem to word and or give all the information out on a particular subject it is biased. He did happen however to jab at another vendors product without any ill will though ...huh?
Anyway not to stray, have you EVER seen CHARGE TEMPS decrease during a 9000 rpm pull?
How much boost was being run? How far apart were the dyno runs?
You know it really doesn't matter because you are filled with misinformation and anger you won't have a logical conversation.
Don't go on an internet forum and spread half truths to increase business. Tell the whole story and give some theoretical and practical information to back your findings. When you come off with posts, like what we are debating right now, that are incomplete, people will infer that everyone elses products are inferior.
It is unfair and untruthful.
Nobody says or does anything about it thats why it is accepted on this forum. When someone does they are persecuted. Find someone or something else to defend because you just look like a salesman without any clue what you are doing or selling. Take it how you want "steve" its what I see.
Originally Posted by Jasil;
They are inferior though! If one intercooler increases "charge" air temps by 49 degrees and the other increases "charge" air temps by 7 degrees I know which one I will buy. Who said anything about decreasing "charge" air temps if somone did say decrease that would be a mistype. I'm done good luck in your Buschur bashing
So again do some reading and think about things in a logical manner.
Could a moderator come in and clean up all this ridiculous arguing?
DB said air intake temps went up with a particular intercooler.
If you can't say that without blowing up a thread with arguments, then the mods aren't doing there job here.
DB said air intake temps went up with a particular intercooler.
If you can't say that without blowing up a thread with arguments, then the mods aren't doing there job here.
Exactly. Trent posted up his dyno sheet. He has timeslips to prove his claim. What's the beef about? David got awesome power out of this vehicle, end of story.
Well believe it.
There is a difference between charge temps and intake temps. Learn it and understand it.
The problem is that when "the worlds" best tuner can seem to word and or give all the information out on a particular subject it is biased. He did happen however to jab at another vendors product without any ill will though ...huh?
Anyway not to stray, have you EVER seen CHARGE TEMPS decrease during a 9000 rpm pull?
How much boost was being run? How far apart were the dyno runs?
You know it really doesn't matter because you are filled with misinformation and anger you won't have a logical conversation.
Don't go on an internet forum and spread half truths to increase business. Tell the whole story and give some theoretical and practical information to back your findings. When you come off with posts, like what we are debating right now, that are incomplete, people will infer that everyone elses products are inferior.
It is unfair and untruthful.
Nobody says or does anything about it thats why it is accepted on this forum. When someone does they are persecuted. Find someone or something else to defend because you just look like a salesman without any clue what you are doing or selling. Take it how you want "steve" its what I see.
There is a difference between charge temps and intake temps. Learn it and understand it.
The problem is that when "the worlds" best tuner can seem to word and or give all the information out on a particular subject it is biased. He did happen however to jab at another vendors product without any ill will though ...huh?
Anyway not to stray, have you EVER seen CHARGE TEMPS decrease during a 9000 rpm pull?
How much boost was being run? How far apart were the dyno runs?
You know it really doesn't matter because you are filled with misinformation and anger you won't have a logical conversation.
Don't go on an internet forum and spread half truths to increase business. Tell the whole story and give some theoretical and practical information to back your findings. When you come off with posts, like what we are debating right now, that are incomplete, people will infer that everyone elses products are inferior.
It is unfair and untruthful.
Nobody says or does anything about it thats why it is accepted on this forum. When someone does they are persecuted. Find someone or something else to defend because you just look like a salesman without any clue what you are doing or selling. Take it how you want "steve" its what I see.



